After Russian collusion was exposed as, essentially, a treasonous Obama administration plot, everything that followed in the get Trump saga—perpetual scandals, two impeachment attempts, a stolen 2020 election via a bioweapon and massive voter fraud, a January 6 insurrection scam, an unprecedented DOJ/FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago, countless post-presidency indictments and lawsuits—should have sent a crystal-clear message:
Donald Trump cannot survive.
As a friend recently put it: “Even the most disconnected, apolitical person should be able to notice the weird, pathological obsession.”
You’d be surprised, I said.
Even so, it is abundantly clear: destroying Trump is imperative. There can be no other outcome. What did he do to deserve such pathological preoccupation? Well, let’s first address the things he didn’t do, which are represented by seven years’ worth of fake, manufactured scandals and crimes that were all disproven and fell flat. As for what he did do, as to the crime that made his demise imperative, the sin is singular:
He proclaimed America’s political establishment “failed and corrupt,” and said he was going to replace it “with a new government controlled by you, the American people”—
but wait, isn’t that how it was meant to be in America? The original design?
Given the establishment’s reaction, its continuing seven-year legal assault and its abundantly obvious goal—Trump’s destruction. His accusation clearly and inarguably has merit. His sin was publicly indicting the establishment and challenging its/their domain and rule, and for seven-years now, members all—the Democrat Party, the GOP, the FBI and CIA, the deep state, the news media—have been seeking his demise. And despite falling flat on their faces with every single attempt, they, unfazed and undaunted, keep trying.
What would inspire such establishment zeal? Such odd political alliances and unity?
Exposing their rigged and corrupt system and putting an end to it, perhaps?
Restoring constitutional law and order and returning political control to the American people?
A seven-year assault yet at full-throttle, the establishment clearly loathes both of those ideas.
Why?
Well, maybe because they’re corrupt, and because they really, really like the beneficial system they’ve arranged for themselves.
I’m spit-balling here, but it makes sense.
Establishment democrats and republicans can’t unify on anything else. Yet challenge their power and control, their domain and rule, and their interests suddenly align. Suddenly there is agreement of purpose and kinship, which they don’t publicize, but that’s nonetheless obvious in their shared goal: Trump’s destruction. Liberals say directly, Trump is a criminal unfit for office! While GOPer’s like Paul Ryan are more indirect: “Republicans can’t win with Trump.”
A softer, less compromising approach, but the same objective, nonetheless.
It has been said countless times, but perhaps it’s time to start living by it: don’t listen to what people say; watch what they do. Behavior never lies. Via behavior, people tell you what is in their heart, tell you what they believe and, to the point, their objectives and goals. Electing Trump, the American people overwhelmingly loved and agreed with him in 2016, and with 11 million more votes in 2020, loved and agreed even more. The establishment, on the other hand, did not agree, and for seven-years now have made the American people pay for their disagreeable selection.
Why?
Because they can! Because it’s their domain and rule, not the people’s.
Via their power and control, the establishment manufactured seven-years’ worth of legal fraud to destroy Trump. Seven years’ worth—and the fraud factory is still up and running and the fraud ongoing. Now that is determination. Dedication invariably summoned for but one reason: abject fear.
Absolute terror of losing their domain, power, control, and rule.
Enduring their attacks and undeterred, Trump is equally determined to end their establishment reign, their rule of deceit and abuses at the expense of their rightful lords and paymasters, the American people. Hence, Trump cannot win reelection—cannot be allowed to run, even, and have the opportunity. If the citizenry understood the gravity of this conflict, they would be more concerned and engaged. Instead, they view it as normal, eye-rollable politics. When it is anything but normal politics. It’s wholly abnormal, in fact, which should be obvious when an entire political establishment undertakes a seven-year effort to destroy a singular politician and prevent him from exposing its treasonous crimes.
For challenging the establishment’s domain and rule, not only can Trump not occupy the White House. He must be destroyed, utterly—not only to save and ensure the established order, but to send a message to all others who’d dare challenge its/their authority.
This unrelenting and bankrupting legal assault is what awaits you, too, slick!
The bottom line in all this is dark and ugly: the establishment is not only deeply corrupt, but treasonous. Members betrayed the United States and have been both caught in their treasonous crimes and, specifically the GOP, exposed for their establishment loyalty. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and every other establishment-loyal republican knows full well what the establishment has done to Trump, and fully understand the involved corruption, too. And they nevertheless chose a side—
the establishment side.
Trump represents a choice: the establishment or the United States Constitution? Or rather, establishment domain and rule, or constitutional servitude, as designed and intended? Some members want to avoid accountability for their treasonous crimes, obviously, but none want to surrender the power and control they’ve arranged for themselves, or the subsequent security and fruits, either. Members can accumulate vast personal wealth. They are societal celebrities, inexplicably cheered and lauded. Controlling law enforcement, intelligence, the judiciary, the news media—they can do whatever they want and either conceal their crimes or, if necessary, avoid punishment.
Establishment members fancy themselves rulers, not servants of the people. And like all the rest of history’s despots, they aim to keep it that way.
Hence, Trump must be destroyed. Utterly.
He cannot survive because he’s threatening the establishment’s domain and rule, which is more than just a beneficial arrangement, incidentally. It’s HQ for a communist takeover of the United States—and not a planned communist takeover, either, but one ongoing. Liberals don’t plan on subjecting themselves to the peasantry’s complaints and unhappiness forever. The goal is to arrange things so the peasantry’s complaints and unhappiness don’t matter; so elections don’t matter; so campaign lying and all those bus tours to stinking, backwater states and towns are unnecessary.
The Marxist objective well on its way to fulfillment, Donald Trump cannot then survive. If he survives and wins reelection, he will once again stop the establishment’s destruction of America, devastation necessary to usher in communism, and to permanently shutter the complaint and unhappiness departments. He will restore the historic prosperity, security, and success of his first term and, most injurious, will yet again demonstrate the ineptitude, corruption, and undeniable Marxist evil of America’s establishment complex.
And that … is a problem.
All roads lead to Russian collusion. Basically, the establishment plotted against the American people and were caught, were exposed. Thus, every step of the last seven years, every get Trump-themed political contrivance and subsequent road to nowhere, has been a strategic and desperate effort to conceal their treasonous Russian collusion crime, and to hold on to their domain and rule.
Command and control that’s in grave danger as long as Trump hangs around.
Trump cannot hang around, which is no less obvious. Hence the question: in a functioning republic where freedom, liberty, and the citizenry reign, why not? Why can’t a political challenger exist, and be met fairly in the arena of ideas? Whom does a functioning republic and Trump threaten exactly?
The answer presents these suggestions, ideas not to be met fairly in the arena of ideas, either: perhaps the republic isn’t functioning. Perhaps the established rulers refuse to tolerate such insolence and disobedience from any and every political challenger.
And furthermore, perhaps Trump demonstrates it.
©JMW 7/2023
All Rights Reserved
JMWs latest: New Rules: Relationship Logic for the Darkside.
John Mark Warren 