The American people must look a little deeper into this establishment concept. Doing so, they’d learn (a) the establishment isn’t exclusively democrat and (b) the forces against America are much more massive and problematic than they realize.
It is to say, extremely few in Washington are loyal and friendly to the American ideal.
The establishment is concerned with two things: power, and guaranteeing it has it. And one either opposes that idea, or supports it—supports establishment power and control, that is.
There is no middle ground. The constitution says so.
So then, why can’t the republican primary candidates talk about it? Why isn’t it the only thing they are talking about? It should be.
What is “it,” exactly?
A treasonous plot—an ongoing treasonous plot—by the Obama administration and his fellow conspirators: Hillary Clinton, America’s own FBI and CIA and DOJ, the Democrat Party, deep state actors, geopolitical players, and nearly the entire national news media, save Fox News.
Obama and the entire establishment tried to take down a duly elected president in 2016, tried to usurp democracy and ixnay the people’s choice, and used the full and immense power of the federal government to complete and ensure an undeniably communist transformation.
That’s the charge. The only question is: is it true?
Because if it is, then nothing else matters. No issue is more important.
Well, it is true. Irrefutably so.
In under oath court testimony, Clinton campaign manager, Robby Mook, confessed that Hillary “signed off” on the phony Steele dossier scheme. And she not only signed off; she and the Democrat National Committee (DNC) paid for it, via a laundered draft, an illegal use of campaign finances, as it turned out. Clinton and the DNC were fined by the Federal Elections Commission—a fine quietly issued and paid.
I can’t speak for everyone, but I’m not paying a fine for something I didn’t do. Because whatever would incur a fine would be (a) illegal and (b) an expense both financial and reputational—equally intolerable. I simply wouldn’t do it. I wouldn’t launder drafts, either, for the same reasons. And if I were criminal enough to do these things, well, I’d quietly manage them … too.
Gee, laundered payments. What all does that imply, exactly?
Special Counsel, John Durham, investigated the Russian collusion matter. He concluded there was no lawful predicate for the FBI to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and to spy on Trump’s campaign. Simply, the FBI didn’t have any evidence for the action but Clinton’s fake dossier, which each and every conspirator no less confessed in under oath/penalty-for-perjury testimony—but then said otherwise publicly and while not under oath and penalty of perjury.
Something about being under oath and criminal perjury really brings out the truth in people, even treasonous liberals.
Even so, in service to a treasonous coup, the FBI did it anyway, an act then clearly and indisputably sanctioned by the Conspirator In Chief: Barrack Obama. A historic conspiracy that was nonetheless left uninvestigated and unreported by the entire national news media, for now seven years.
So. It’s settled, then. The entire establishment—the Democrat Party, the Obama administration, the deep state, the news media—conspired to commit treason against the United States and the America people. Of course, we can hear liberal voters howling: But, but, nobody’s been convicted or went to prison! Okay but, does that make these revelations any less true? The liberal faithful like to hang their hat on the no time-no crime idea, as if that somehow nullifies the treasonous plot and exonerates their political deities. Well, what about these under oath and investigative revelations? What about the campaign finance violations and fines?
Ask the FEC why they fined Clinton and the DNC. They’d say, Well, in paying for the dossier, Mrs. Clinton and the Committee misused campaign funds [In fact, the FEC did say it, via the fine].
You: So they paid for this ‘Steele Dossier,’ then, which was fake. “
FEC: Well, yes. At least they paid for it. We aren’t concerned with matters of authenticity, only spending violations.
And if Clinton paid for it, then it renders the whole Russian collusion matter a fraud, a political calumny. The fact all the conspirators knew it was a fraud renders it a treasonous conspiracy. Albeit a conspiracy with no convictions or prison time. And to the fact there hasn’t been any punishment:
Might that speak to the deep establishment corruption of which Donald Trump speaks?
Might that be because the establishment is a corrupt criminal enterprise?
A treasonous coup doesn’t demonstrate and authenticate crime and corruption?
So, again: it’s settled—the irritating ululation of liberal voters notwithstanding. The entire establishment conspired to commit treason against the United States and the America people. This now firmly established, here’s the question:
Do you really think treasonous conspirators care who runs for the 2024 GOP nomination?
In other words, if traitors attempt a treasonous coup to arrest power and render the citizenry communist slaves, and then fail, and then use their establishment allies, federal agencies, and ultimate power to evade punishment for seven years, and thus far survive, virtually intact, and are thus emboldened, and poised to perhaps try it again, to this time perhaps succeed, never to be punished ever again, and to succeed in their communist dream.
Do you really think an opposition’s candidate would matter to such people?
What matters to traitors, a crime punishable by death, incidentally, is not getting caught. So Job Number One, obviously, is keeping your crime concealed, which the traitors have thus far done, at least to the extent they haven’t been criminally indicted, thanks to their establishment network of conspirators and ideologues.
Now. Next question: regarding the opposition, who is the one GOP primary candidate who intimately knows what the traitors did, and can prove it? Which candidate has seen the evidence, documented the evidence [Mar-a-Lago raid anyone?], and whose functionaries helped prove the traitor’s crimes? Furthermore, which candidate is the only candidate railing about establishment corruption, about putting an end to both the corruption and establishment reign, and about returning rightful, constitutional authority to the American citizenry?
Donald Trump, of course. And isn’t this—establishment corruption and specifically treason—the only issue that matters?
We’re talking about traitors, here. Traitors who are not only legally pursuing and indicting Donald Trump, but who must pursue and indict. Why?
For their crime, of course.
They’re Marxist traitors and treasonous coup conspirators. So, yes. They actually do care which GOP primary candidate runs for the GOP nomination, at least where it concerns Trump.
The obsessive litigious shoes don’t match the dress?
So then, what is this farce that is the GOP primary? Why are the candidates moving forward as if a treasonous coup never took place? It plays right into the establishment’s hands. In fact, the treasonous conspirators love this concept. There are all the primary candidates, talking about all the problems they’ll solve when “they become president.” It’s politics as usual—just what a treasonous establishment would want.
No need to look back on a treasonous plot, folks. If we were guilty, then we would’ve been punished. Just ask our voters.
Or as Barrack Obama put it: “Forward!” A term of conviction, interestingly, that European Marxists and radicals applied to their own respective movements, also aimed at moving past capitalism and—“Forward!”—into socialism and communism. And it’s really just communism, socialism the purgatory before the gulags and gas chambers.
The GOP primary candidates are on stage talking about political stuff, a return to “fiscal responsibility” and “common sense governance.” Meanwhile, the traitors are busy burying the one threat to their power in manufactured and limitless litigation, an issue GOP primary candidates are clearly loath to discuss.
We need to move past Trump.
We can’t win with Trump.
We need freshness in the Oval Office.
Trump’s buried in litigation!
Well, what is that litigation all about? Who’s burying Trump in it, exactly? And why?
All these republican candidates know what, who, and why. But they also know their desires and ambitions, and what it requires to serve those desires and ambitions. And a disservice to those desires and ambitions is acknowledging a treasonous coup took place and, on behalf of the American people, fighting the Marxist establishment that executed it.
There is one candidate acknowledging and fighting. Thus far he has refused to share the primary stage with America’s Marxist enemies.
That’s the power of calling out your enemy and exposing his sins: if forces everyone into a choice, into choosing a side and exposing themselves. Including republican primary candidates, who’ve turned out to be just more establishment myrmidons. Trump the competition, they’d rather defeat him, than defend the American people from a communist coup.
Side chosen. Loyalty revealed.
It’s like looking at a tiny, pin-prick island on a world map, say, like, the Solomon Island’s Guadalcanal. Then approaching that island by boat to realize its comparative immensity and vastness. Likewise, the establishment is more expansive than people might suspect. More than just democrats, it’s a sea of self-serving people who want to maintain the political arrangement and eliminate any threat to the profitable status quo.
Something they do by burying the threat in manufactured litigation and pretending treason is not the elephant in the room during a presidential primary.
©JMW 8/2023
All Rights Reserved
JMWs Latest: New Rules: Relationship Logic for the Darkside.
John Mark Warren 