Author: JMW

There is no plan to replace Joe Biden. There will be no plan to replace Biden.  

Biden is the plan.  

After all that has happened since Barack Obama’s treasonous 2016 Russian collusion plot to steal the presidency, it is inexplicable, almost unforgivably so, that conservative media still can’t understand the current establishment play. All that intellectual conservative muscle, and they’re arguing over how Biden’s going to be replaced and who’s going to replace him.  

Biden is the play, guys.  

Just as the four criminal cases against Trump could have been brought in 2022, and even before, all were intentionally delayed until election year 2024 for maximum political/election impact.  

Massive lawfare and election interference—that was the establishment play.  

Likewise, establishment liberals could have ditched Biden long ago, all the way back to the democrat primary in 2019. His mental health even further declined, they certainly could have dispensed with him in this year’s primary. Yet here he is, the nearly mindless democrat incumbent, standing stiff and mentally vacant in a cognitive Juneteenth haze, a former president later leading him off a fundraiser stage. 

A second Biden term—that is most definitely the establishment play. 

Biden is the establishment’s guy. Period, end of conversation.   

Everybody, and I mean everybody, knows Biden has Alzheimer’s, or some brand of cognitive ailment. Barrack Obama knows. Hillary Clinton knows. In its entirety, the Democrat Party knows. The party’s news media allies know. Biden’s entire White House staff knows. The vice president, Kamala Harris, knows. The Secret Service knows. The FBI and CIA know. Observing up close and personal what everyone else sees on television every day, they all know. They just can’t acknowledge the ailment for what it means to their political future, to their liberal ideology and, for some, for what it means to their criminal past. 

Consider what I’m saying: all these people know Biden is sick, that his mind is mostly gone. That is precisely what they say to each other in private, “Joe’s mind is gone; what are we going to do? What’s the play?” They openly confess the obvious among themselves, but refuse public acknowledgement. And that, folks, can mean but one thing:  

They’re all exploiting him!  

Exploiting an 81-year-old, increasingly decrepit, mentally failing and frail old man for their own political benefit and criminal protection. 

So, remember: when you turn on the news and liberal media personnel and political pundits are discussing normal politics and ignoring Biden’s cognitive disease. They all know he’s sick; they all know the President of the United States’ mind is gone. It is impossible not to know, especially after the debate. Yet they are ignoring the fact in simple, repugnant, and utterly soulless exploitation.  

Nice people, these liberals. Caring and compassionate. Honest, moral, and principled. Just the kind of humans you want looking after your own elderly parents. What liberals won’t do for power, right? Believe it or not, they “Pfft” at this particular misdeed. “Exploiting a senile old man?” they say. “Child’s play.” 

The shameless evil should come as no surprise. We already know they will manufacture Russian collusion evidence and commit treason. So, exploiting an old man with dementia is indeed “child’s play.” And the old man’s own wife is helping them do it, no less.  

How about that deal?  

Your “loving” wife so enamored with being Worst, er, First Lady, that she allows you to walk out on the world stage repeatedly and make a demented fool of yourself. 

As liberals say, “Love wins!” For them it’s just self-love, obviously.  

The depths of their soulless depravity confirmed, one should then know establishment liberals have no intention of replacing Joe Biden. Why not? Well, not because liberals wouldn’t walk a useless, senile elderly person to the woods of a wolf reserve and leave him for cheap wolf fodder. They have no intention of replacing Biden because, well, they can’t.  

Even if sitting in a wheelchair drooling and catching pretend butterflies, they need him.  

Why do they need him?  

Because former president Barrack Obama committed treason.  

Obama, his administration, to include FBI and CIA leadership, and along with Hillary Clinton, conspired to steal the 2016 election via the Russian collusion plot [don’t forget, Obama backed Clinton for president in 2016 instead of his own vice president, Joe Biden. Hence, the plot was clearly on. So, if you think liberals have a problem with freezing out Vice President Kamala Harris, with denying her the opportunity of being the first black, female president. Well, think again]. Actually, the Russian collusion plot was a back-up plan in case Clinton failed to win, an action meant to protect the conspiracy and the conspirators themselves.  

Nevertheless. Obama’s vice president, and an original conspirator with skin in the game, Biden was/is needed in the Oval Office by the conspirators because they can’t trust anyone without skin in the game with presidential power and authority. That’s why Biden had to be the democrat nominee in 2020 and ultimately president, despite his obvious and declining cognitive health, and even the potential optics of him drooling and catching pretend butterflies from his wheelchair in the future.  

Simply, the traitors needed a fellow conspirator in the White House to conceal their treasonous coup, and they need him still. Biden wasn’t a choice; he was a must. The real question is how he won the democrat primary in 2020.  

Does James Clyburn really wield that much national influence? 

The news media, on the other hand, they need a Biden presidency because, via the coup, their cult’s leaders are in danger of being exposed and prosecuted for treason, which puts the news media in subsequent danger of losing its cultural power and control—the power to influence elections for the cult’s leaders, which, of course, ensures the news media’s power and control.  

Obviously, when cult leadership is caught in a treasonous plot, the entire cult suffers.  

The cult’s continuance, their power and control maintained—that is most assuredly the establishment play. 

A man, a president and now presidential incumbent, suffering glaringly obvious cognitive decline, and known to be suffering, no less, has not merely been escorted to the presidency and White House by an entire political party and nearly an entire national news media. Despite his disability becoming yet more glaring and incontrovertible after his ascendance, he has been allowed to remain president. While the political party and news media pretend he is, as ultra-devoted cult member Joe Scarborough put it, “Normal.” 

“Normal,” he says. Meanwhile, the White House is currently tamping down reports Biden is stepping down for his cognitive disease, which the world no less witnessed for itself during the debate. See, this is the problem for Liberalism’s disciples. Rather than think for themselves and draw their own conclusions, however glaringly obvious, they blindly, faithfully, accept what their cult leaders tell them. Joe’s fine. Carry on. Then, later, the truth emerges, as it always does and always will, despite the cult’s best efforts to keep it buried, mind you, and disciples end up looking like fools. One would think them to be humiliated and subsequently enraged at their leaders, but they are not. Respectful and servile, they are eternally forgiving. Eternally. 

Anyway, imagine a huge crowd of concert goers waiting excitedly for the featured band. The lights go out; the hall darkens, pitch black. After a loud speaker voice blares the band’s introduction, the stage lights suddenly blast on. And … 

The stage is empty, completely vacant. 

Shortly, concert goers begin looking around at each other, confused.  

What’s happening? Are we being punked?   

This is precisely how the American people feel—all but liberal voters, that is—watching the ascendancy and continuation of the Biden presidency, and the non-reaction to Biden’s glaringly obvious cognitive illness by a political party and nearly an entire national news media. The deception is more than just absurd and risible.  

It verifies deep, intentional political corruption and criminality.  

It’s redundant, but let’s reestablish it anyway: all in the aforementioned political party and national news media know Biden is sick. Yet, corruptly and criminally, they are attempting to conceal the illness from the American public to win an election for their preferred presidential candidate.  

Now, if that sounds distinctly like evil communism, congratulations.  

You’re not a mindless, servile liberal voter. 

Conservative pundits suggest Biden’s handlers accepted the early debate date in June as a test. If Biden couldn’t cut the cognitive mustard and performed poorly during the debate, then he would be replaced by democrat hierarchy. But then, replaced with whom? The pundits then confess Kamala Harris is despised, polling even worse than Biden, who is at historic polling lows himself. Then they begin with the list of likely candidates—Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Gavin Newsom. Missing in their analysis, however, is Obama’s treasonous Russian collusion plot. It is as if the historic crime never occurred, as if it has no bearing on the current political circumstances. Inexplicably, the issue is neglected, when it should be the guiding event, the cornerstone, of conservative analysis. Why? 

Because concealing the plot has been the establishment’s sole mission for the last eight years. 

Avoiding exposure has guided their every lawless decision and communist ploy along the way. Simply, the conspirators don’t want to get caught, and the news media wants to help them avoid it. To that, can you imagine what it would mean to the Democrat Party and liberalism were its leaders caught in a treasonous plot? One that involved the FBI and CIA and national news media, no less? Can you imagine the fallout were such a heinous betrayal proven and made thoroughly public? 

It would be ruinous. 

And the plot has been proven and made public, incidentally. Aided by their establishment conspirators, the traitors are merely working to keep the proof from being thoroughly publicly known, acknowledged, accepted, and adjudicated. 

For their certain ruination, a co-conspirator with skin in the game, Joe Biden, had to be president in 2020, and must be again in 2024. That’s why the conspirators and their establishment accomplices are ignoring Biden’s glaring cognitive disability and exploiting him. If they acknowledge his ailment publicly, the chance of a Biden second term is dead and Trump is president. The same Trump the establishment has tried to destroy for the last eight years in nearly every way possible to prevent their criminal exposure. The same Trump who uncovered their treasonous plot in his first term, who can expose them, who is now righteously retributive, and who has the wind of 74 million enraged and retribution-minded American patriots in his sails. 

That’s what the urgent and unprecedented Mara-A-Lago raid was all about, incidentally. Regarding their coup, the traitors needed to ascertain the evidence Trump took with him, and to locate, confiscate, and destroy it.  

After its raid on Trump’s estate, the FBI said they had found classified files that Trump had illegally taken from the White House. Bearing “Top Secret” cover sheets, the FBI had arrayed the files on the floor, photographed them, and shared the pictures with the public. It turns out, the FBI had themselves stapled the “Top Secret” cover sheets to the files. Originally, Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team had said the boxes of evidence from the raid were in their original condition from when they were found. In a court brief later, however, they admitted the boxes were altered or manipulated, i.e. with the “Top Secret” cover sheets.  

In other words, the FBI stapled the otherwise unmarked files with “Top Secret” cover sheets for public effect.  

Now, why would the FBI be interested in enhancing evidence for public persuasion? Did the agency do the same for the classified evidence they found at Joe Biden’s residence?  

No. And why not?  

Well, as Obama’s VP was Joe Biden a co-conspirator in Obama’s Russian collusion plot? 

How about the FBI? Were they co-conspirators? 

Make sense now?  

They call it motive. 

 It is all to say this, folks: communist traitors are among us and the political situation is currently grave.  

The conspirators’ lives—and the establishment’s life, too—literally hang in the balance. Just as the all concerned know Biden is cognitively ailing, they are clearly aware, per the raid, that Trump knows what they did, that he has the documentation, and that, as a second-term president he can expose and destroy them. 

So, accepting the early debate date. Conservative pundits say it was a test for Biden. But why couldn’t it be that Biden’s handlers took the early date because they understand the rapidity of Biden’s cognitive decline, and were afraid to wait?  Remember, they all know he is sick; they all know the prognosis, which lacks, shall we say, dependable longevity. If Biden were to deteriorate, handlers could later make an excuse, i.e. “The president refuses to debate a convicted felon.” For Biden’s predictable decline, the handlers know they must debate now, early. Better to do it now while the president is still somewhat cognitively able. Because who knows what optical nightmare the future might bring—optics the handlers can later excuse and conceal, and a future they can avoid. 

The point is the conservative punditry is on the wrong intellectual path. The right path is running establishment behavior of the last eight years through Obama’s treasonous Russian collusion plot. Because protecting the traitors, namely Obama, as well as liberalism and their unholy establishment, has been the impetus for every establishment behavior and ploy of the last eight years. Everything they have done and will do was/is aimed at concealing their treasonous crime. Actually, the conspirators have been doing two things during the past eight years: (a) trying to conceal their treasonous crime, and (b) trying to complete the objective of their treasonous crime: their communist coup. Had Clinton won in 2016, none would be the wiser. Her losing, however, they are now exposed and committed. All hands on establishment deck, there is no turning back. 

 Hence, these “handlers” of Biden’s. Who are they? If Biden’s mind is gone, and it’s clear it is, who is making decisions for the nation? The handlers? And are they not predominantly Obama’s people? And given Biden’s co-conspirator status, would not Biden employ Obama’s people? Would not Obama ensure that Biden employ his personnel? Facing the same criminal fate, have they not ensured it? 

Ignoring tradition, why did Barrack Obama remain in Washington all these many years after his presidency? Pre-Biden’s critical debate with Trump, why were Obama and Clinton, the Democrat Party’s leaders, taking over the reins of the Biden campaign? Obama and Clinton know full well that Biden is cognitively impaired, not to mention a corrupt fool. So why don’t they just come out and confess his illness and begin replacement procedures? He’s sick and can’t do the job is all they have to say, which is no less obvious. Why defy what everyone can now, post-debate, see for themselves? Why keep pretending Biden is healthy and continuing his candidacy?  

Why? Because Obama and Clinton committed treason, with Biden. And because all need a fellow conspirator in the White House to control their fate. 

What I mean is, anyone other than a co-conspirator occupying the White House imperils the traitors. With an outsider, the conspirators lose control of their fate, lose control of the agencies and personnel with whom they can control their fate. With no skin in the game, the outsider has the power and authority and leverage, not the conspirators. The outsider, even a fellow liberal democrat, can turn on the conspirators. After all, the outsider didn’t commit treason. The conspirators did, and they can’t risk their control over staff and agency appointments, and their ability to protect themselves, which has been the day-to-day objective since their fateful defeat in November, 2016. 

Agree with the outcome of the 2020 election or not, the American people supposedly chose a president to run their nation’s affairs. His mind clearly and incontrovertibly gone, Joe Biden cannot be running the country. Someone else must be making the decisions, or perhaps a group, a shadow government. One thing is crystal clear, it’s neither Biden nor the people’s choice.  

As to who is running the country, it should be evident.  

It all began with President Barrack Obama. 

— 

Vice President Biden and his family were traveling the world selling the Biden “brand” and collecting money from prominent dignitaries of other nations to enrich the family. Hillary Clinton was involved in not only a phony dossier and treasonous Russian collusion plot, but in a classified documents crime, an illegal server crime, deleting subpoenaed emails crime and, finally, smashing her cellphones with a hammer to conceal evidence of all these crimes, and surely the evidence of even more crime.  

Who was president during all this Biden family and Clinton crime? 

Barrack Obama.  

Yet, the establishment refuses to not only investigate his role, but to even mention his name. The President of the United States, the boss. The person who controls the FBI, CIA, and the Department of Justice. The person with all the power and ultimate responsibility during all of this historic malfeasance. Why, he isn’t connected to any of it.  

How is that? How the hell is that? 

How is it that all this flagrant and extraordinary crime is occurring under Obama’s command, and none of it gets connected to him? How is it that an entire national news media, save Fox News, doesn’t want to make this most basic of logical connections?  

Though it was only Fox News investigating and reporting on all this Obama era corruption and crime, the FBI took a public hit. The CIA a took a hit. Hillary Clinton took a hit. Her Perkins, Coie law firm took a hit. The Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, took a hit. All the collusion conspirators: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strozk, Lisa Page, Bruce and Nellie Ohr—they and many more all took a public hit. Biden and his family took a hit. Even the corrupt establishment news media took a hit.  

Conspirator upon conspirator was dragged to the public square and exposed for their treasonous crime. Yet the conspiracy’s leader, the person in charge, the person controlling and directing the agencies and the people involved, he hardly has his name mentioned and has thus far been given a pass.  

Why, it’s as if he was never president! 

It seems the predominant news media question would be: what was President Obama’s role in all this? How did he not know? How did his FBI, CIA, DOJ, and National Intelligence Director not know all this corruption and crime were going on? That (a) there was a Russian collusion conspiracy afoot within the president’s orbit, and (b) not warn him about it? We certainly know now the conspiracy occurred. We know it involved the upper echelons of the FBI and CIA, too, and officials in Obama’s White House. So, even if the FBI and CIA were unaware of the conspiracy and caught flatfooted, they know now. Where are the indictments? The disciplinary measures? Where is the Department of Justice, for that matter? The news media? 

Of course, they have all been absent since Special Counsel Robert Mueller finally declared there was no evidence of collusion between Trump and Putin, which leaves but one obvious conclusion: the FBI, CIA, DOJ, and news media were involved in the conspiracy, too, were co-conspirators. Which, of course, is why they have been absent on every front—discovery, investigation, adjudication, punishment—for the last eight years.  

And to be clear, this is Obama’s FBI, CIA, and DOJ. His hand-selected personnel, er, conspirators. 

Anyone wanting to do the laziest of intellectual work knows that Obama is the head of the snake in all this. Regarding the political upheaval of the last eight years, since Donald Trump was elected president, Obama is the lone, responsible figure. He’s the only one who could direct everything that happened: utilizing Clinton’s phony dossier, spying on the Trump campaign, unmasking people in the Trump campaign, lying to FISA courts and getting warrants, the phony Mueller investigation and framing people in the Trump campaign. Otherwise, America’s intelligence and law enforcement agencies have gone rogue.  

And given their high-tech spying tools, and their subsequent ability to blackmail and frame whomever they desire, how frightening is that idea? 

Hillary Clinton and the DNC (Democrat National Committee) purchased the phony Steele Dossier from Christopher Steele, perhaps commissioned it, and brought it to Obama via her Perkins, Coie attorneys. Why did Clinton bring the dossier to Obama?  

Because she didn’t have the power of the presidency, couldn’t command the FBI and CIA to procure FISA warrants and initiate spying. The President of the United States, Barack Obama, had that power and command.  

He and his family selling the Biden brand to the world, Joe Biden doesn’t have any power or command, either. The world wasn’t paying for his influence, wasn’t sending the Biden Family cashier’s checks for his juice. Biden doesn’t have any juice. The person the world’s investors wanted to influence, the person with the actual juice to get things done, is the Commander In Chief: Barrack Obama. 

 Obama is the kingpin, the conspiratorial Godfather handing down orders. In the treasonous conspiracy car, he is the engine. Without him, the whole operation is just lifeless, rusting metal. Obama puts everything into motion, and the plan he set in motion in 2016 was an attempted communist coup against American democracy and the American people. Wherein he tried to not only install his choice, Hillary Clinton, into the Oval Office, but employed America’s FBI and CIA in the crime. As for transgressions, this is the worst, the most unforgivable, ranking right up there with murder. I don’t know how one emphasizes the gravity of the crime and situation so that it arouses the attention and concern of a citizenry.  

But this is an attempted communist coup in real time.  

Obama and his administrative co-conspirators tried to destroy freedom, to end it, to enslave a nation. Clinton losing the 2016 election, however, he and his co-conspirators not only failed. Their coup was exposed, which was unmistakably strategic and planned. 

 For example, Obama’s FBI director, James Comey, refused to prosecute Clinton for all her many crimes. Why? Because Clinton, a fellow communist, was to be coronated as the next President of the United States per the boss’s, Obama’s, orders, and was to complete Obama’s communist objectives. Trump’s victory, however, thwarted the plot and threw the conspirators into sheer panic. Per presidential authority, Trump would be able to then expose Obama’s coup. Hence, the Russian collusion fraud and the intentionally long-winded Mueller investigation, meant to distract, delay, and prevent the conspirators’ criminal exposure. Hence, the legal assault on Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, too, Trump’s new national security advisor, who, via his military and intelligence acumen and public distaste for Obama, would not only know where to find all the coup evidence, but would relish exposing Obama and his treasonous plot.  

Needing to buy time, the conspirators made Trump the Russian collusion criminal, instead.  

Or rather, Obama made Trump the Russian collusion criminal. 

And here we are eight years later, the conspirators still desperately trying to survive and becoming increasingly more desperate. So desperate, in fact, that they would not only exploit a senile old man, but try to convince a now acutely aware citizenry that he isn’t senile—an impossible sell now given Biden’s debate debacle.  

Thus, imagine the terror and consequent panic among the conspirators. It is vital that they have Biden in the White House. But then Biden is an alarming, undeniable cognitive mess during the debate, which the whole world saw and finally acknowledged. Along with conservatives and republicans, even some democrats and former news media allies are now calling for Biden to step down, which the conspirators simply cannot abide. Now they must get a president with exposed and irrefutable dementia to the second term finish line, to prevent an angry and surging candidate they have tried to unsuccessfully destroy from exposing not only their treasonous crimes, but the political bias, corruption, and treachery of their complicit establishment. 

For the scenario, here’s a descriptive phrase: an injured and cornered animal. 

All their schemes and tricks having failed for the last eight years, the latest now stammering and staring thousand-yard-like during public debates. The term crisis doesn’t begin to describe matters for the conspirators. Realize that if Obama is exposed, the whole treasonous plot blows up, which is precisely why his role has never been explored nor his name mentioned. If the conspiracy’s roots are traced to Obama, then the political upheaval of the last eight years not only makes complete sense. The coup is confirmed and verified—is everything Fox News and conservatives said it was from the beginning.  

A “fake news” news media is then confirmed, too. The nation’s news media not only chose sides with a political party, the Democrat Party, and shilled on its behalf. They helped Obama execute and conceal his treasonous crime. Then, they knowingly ushered a senile old man into the White House and maintained his presidency for four years—and are attempting to ensure four more.  

Remember: they know. They all know, and are clearly committed. 

Just like every facet of the establishment knows Biden is senile, they all know President Obama committed treason in 2016, too. They know Clinton paid for the dossier, that her campaign manager said she signed off on the plot. They know the 2020 election was an electoral fraud, and why. They know that the laptop is authentic, that Hunter Biden is guilty, and that the Biden Family was selling out the country. They know 51 former intelligence officials knowingly lied about the laptop’s origins to help Biden win. They know Nancy Pelosi was responsible for January 6^th security, that the congressional committee investigating the event lied and destroyed evidence to destroy Trump. They know all the criminal cases against Trump are manufactured frauds, and why.  

They know it all, and they know why. 

Here’s what else they know: with Biden’s illness exposed, their criminal exposure is imminent.  

Hence, the acts of panic and desperation, i.e. pretending a senile presidential candidate isn’t senile. And in that, it is impossible to expose themselves any more vividly and thoroughly. 

For the conspirators to survive, Biden must not only remain their candidate, but win. The problem is the public’s now comprehensive awareness of their ailing candidate, and the panic within the establishment. Post-debate, the news media is frightened and flailing because the world saw for itself what they had been trying to hide. Sensing doom, and worse, personal humiliation, the weakest members are terrified. They are calling for Biden to step aside for another democrat candidate, are effectively crying out to the conspirators to do something, anything!, to prevent their exposure and humiliation, too.  

The proverbial wheels coming off the corrupt and criminal and senile establishment bus, it is difficult for the conspirators to keep the windows up and all flailing hands and arms inside.  

Believing Obama and his fellow conspirators calm and cool in all this is utter foolishness. They are in deep trouble, and know it. In fact, their entire liberal establishment is in trouble, is on the brink of ruinous devastation. Biden’s senility now confirmed and undeniable, they know the questions are not only imminent, but plenteous. Whose idea was it to pull out of Afghanistan? Who’s making the military decisions? Who made the economic decisions that have affected the lives of Americans so punitively? Who’s behind all this green energy legislation? Who made the decisions regarding the Ukraine war? Regarding Israel and Palestine? Who’s responsible for the border and immigration decisions, the illegal invasion plaguing the nation?

Biden incapacitated for the last four years, somebody needs to start providing answers, and now!  

And there is this intriguing query: is it really surprising that Biden’s political agenda is precisely Obama’s political agenda? Or, perhaps it’s the other way around. 

Biden’s exposed illness presents all sorts of catastrophic problems for the conspirators. Even so, it doesn’t matter how sick Biden gets or how absurd the notion of Biden support becomes. A co-conspirator, Biden must remain in the race and emerge victorious.  

That’s key for the traitors. Absolutely vital.  

It means: even if plucking pretend butterflies from the air in a wheelchair, Biden will still be the democrat candidate in November. He must be, which sets the stage for some compelling intrigue in the meantime. After Biden’s catastrophic, coming out debate party, even the liberal long knives came out for Biden. Hollywood freaked out. So did major donors, and even some prominent news media figures and democrats. The New York Times editorial board even called Biden’s continued candidacy a “reckless gamble.” Suddenly, the whole world was awake and opposing Biden’s candidacy, and demanding he step aside. 

The conspirators’ response to the calls?  

Via “President” Biden: “Absolutely not.”  

To provide the vital and impending ruse of the next four months much needed support, the conspirators called the nation’s democrat governors to the White House for an urgent meeting. Biden on his “A” game during the meeting apparently, select governors rushed to the media microphones after. Their unified message was clear:  

“The president is in it to win it.” 

In other words, don’t believe your lying eyes and ears, America. Joe Biden is perfectly healthy and capable. 

Four months of this ridiculous charade will be incredibly intriguing.

In a list of all the worst things that could happen to upend a presidential campaign, cognitive disease is the worst, just behind death. In Biden’s case, the traitors are clearly breezing right past that problem, which demonstrates the vital necessity of a co-conspirator in the White House, and that nothing will keep Biden from being the candidate in November. Of course, the conspirators all recognize the formidability of that idea now, now that Biden’s senility has been publicly confirmed, which then renders an honest and fair election even more out of the question for the conspirators.   

Meaning: if you think the cheating was bad in the 2020 election. Brace yourself, Effy. 

Cornered and desperate, the treasonous criminals hemmed themselves in with a cognitively ailing Biden in 2020, and now his mind is nearly gone. They tried to hide the illness, with establishment assistance, but now it is fully recognizable and undeniable. They can’t turn to Kamala Harris because she’s not an original conspirator with skin in the game. As for Hillary Clinton, she is damaged and completely unlikable goods. Michelle Obama is out, too, because her husband is in enough trouble as it is and, as president, she would be forced lie, conceal, and become a conspirator herself. California governor, Gavin Newsom, is out. Because, in what would be a total shock to him, his own state is a failing mess, and he’s smarmy and repulsive. 

Of course, the whole replacement idea is a waste of time and words, because Obama and his fellow conspirators, to include Biden, need Biden in the White House. He is the last line of defense between Donald Trump, a just legal system, and their exposure and punishment. For the conspirators, Biden is quite literally a life and death necessity. So, they are going to continue to lie about Biden’s illness, and continue to justify a Biden presidency. However frail and crumbling case by case, they are going to continue their attempts to take Trump out legally via the courts. The news media and democrat political pundits are going to whine and moan and complain about their candidate, Biden, and demand that democrats make a change. Liberal voters will sit stunned and speechless, because their political gods and cult leaders are clearly lying to their faces, and they know it, and don’t know what to do.  

Finally, there will be all this liberal dysfunction for the next four months over Biden’s candidacy, which will be occurring for one reason and one reason only:  

Obama and his conspirators need a Biden presidency to protect themselves. 

And then, amazingly, after all the in-house bickering and chaos over Biden’s candidacy for four months, the entire, evil liberal cult will accept the fraud and ultimately coalesce behind their senile candidate. Forget their previous arguments and statements and demands regarding Biden’s cognitive unviability. He is now their man! Healthy and ready to serve!  

Never better, he’s the best version of Joe Biden ever! 

And yes. Liberals are this utterly plastic and shameless. 

So, get ready for the polls that show Biden, inexplicably, in a neck and neck race with Donald Trump, because that is the race the conspirators must have. They need a tight race to make cheating less obvious. The further Biden is behind, the harder it is to legitimize and justify a Biden victory—which is already hard enough given the public witness to his senility.  

Ultimately, the fact is this: Obama is a communist traitor. Only when that fact is exposed does all this plasticity and shamelessness end. Until then, it’s all just, run of the mill political drama that protects Obama, his conspiracy, and his fellow conspirators. 

 The chaotic events of the last eight years are not regular politics. There is a reason all the upheaval occurred, and it isn’t Donald Trump. It is for a treasonous conspiratorial crime perpetuated by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, America’s own FBI and CIA, a deep state, and a national news media. More pointedly, it’s because of a bunch of liberal democrats, rather, a bunch of communists, wanted to quietly loose America from its foundational mooring of freedom and democracy, and drag it into the deep, dark waters of communism, sans anyone knowing and fighting.  

Caught in the act, their exposure and punishment are now finally at stake. To assess what they might be capable of in coming days, realize this: 

Their destiny and lives are dependent upon a senile co-conspirator. 

*This article contains opinion. Excellent opinion.

©JMW 7/2024 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

“Our immigration system is broken,” a republican acquaintance insisted. I couldn’t believe my ears, how intellectually incurious and stunted an intelligent, accomplished person could be. This is what a liberal pretending to be a republican looks and sounds like. The liberal talking point is “a broken immigration system,” and these “republicans” repeat the phrase merely because it’s the popular establishment position—the establishment being liberal, of course.  

That’s the power of media, of liberal media, of the mainstream media. It sets the ideological course, and that’s the “popular” opinion and position, rendering all other opinion inferior and unpopular. 

Evaluating the immigration problem and thinking for themselves is out of the question for these “republicans.” Were they to do so, they’d come to an opposing position, to my position. But doing so would not only contradict popular opinion. Worse, it would invite stinging ridicule and accusation, which is simply intolerable.  

Like their liberal kinfolk, these “republicans” worry about what people think and say about them. They don’t like the conservative label, but haven’t the courage to be open, unapologetic liberals, either, an affiliation deemed equally unsavory. So, they call themselves “republicans” but espouse popular liberal orthodoxy. Doctrine such as: “our immigration system is broken.” It’s shady and gutless, but just what you’d expect from liberals, in republican clothing or otherwise. 

 In question is the popular ideological position. Is America’s immigration system really broken? 

Saying the immigration system is broken is like saying, “This war is lost.” As the late Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid—may he writhe in eternal torment in hell’s hottest corner—publicly proclaimed in 2007 regarding the ongoing Iraq War. Reid, the same liberal who knowingly lied about presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s unpaid taxes before the 2012 presidential election. Asked about the intentional deceit before his death, Reid said simply, “He didn’t win, did he?” Meaning Romney. And Romney, a “republican” of this shady and gutless variety, still aligns with his liberal accusers and tormentors. 

Reid was an evil human being; may he eternally writhe. Nevertheless, that’s what he said, that the Iraq War was lost, and America was defeated. To that, and to these liberals in republican clothing and their open and unapologetic liberal kin, this question: how can any war ever be lost by a country with an atomic arsenal?  

One word: Hiroshima.   

The point is no war is ever lost. Same as no immigration system is ever “broken.” To suggest otherwise in either case is far beyond utter nonsense.  

Immigration control is simple: build a wall, lockdown the borders with law enforcement and/or military, and man the watchtowers at each and every point of vulnerability. Immigration control isn’t a matter of walls, personnel, and armament, which America and virtually every nation has and can easily and immediately put into place. It’s a matter of political will, which we know to be implicitly true for one, Donald Trump. 

Pre-Trump, the immigration and border control issues were, for decades, paid mere lip service by political leadership, democrat and republican alike. Take Hillary Clinton, for example:  

“Illegals should be sent back … we’ve got to do more [about border security] … we have to send a clear message: just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay.” 

And the late California Senator, Diane Feinstein:  

“I think we can enforce our borders; I think we should enforce our borders. To have a situation where 40% of the babies born on Medicaid in California today are born of illegal immigrants creates a very real problem for [California], which is in deficit. And [to] have 17% of our prison population, at a cost of $300 million a year, be illegal immigrants who come here and commit felonies? That’s not what this nation is all about.”—and these remarks were made decades ago. 

And Barrack Obama: 

“All of us take offense to anyone who reaps the rewards of living in America without taking on the responsibilities of living in America … We’re also a nation of laws. [Illegals] broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous.” 

For appearances, congress funded a wall in 2006, the Secure Fence Act, but never built it. Never addressed all this faux concern, either: “illegals and their children getting to stay;” or imprisoned illegals who “come here and commit felonies” at taxpayer expense; or them “reaping the rewards of America without taking on the responsibility.”  

Addressing the issues, leaders were clearly aware of them. So, why were the concerns never physically addressed and the wall never built?  

Because it was all lip service in servitude to this fact: leaders wanted open borders and illegal immigration.  

If they didn’t want it, they would stop it, which is ridiculously simple and easily done.  

America’s illegal population was growing for decades, to the point no one could really say how many illegals were in the country. Nobody knew and nobody cared because the result was … desired. Leadership wanted to change the country’s racial dynamics from predominantly white, God-fearing, Christian, pro-flag, pro-constitution, pro-gun, and pro-America loving patriot to something a little more brown, desperate, malleable, dependent, and more amenable to enslavement. Transformation was clearly the plan because, for decades, nobody did anything to rectify the problem.  

Enter Donald Trump … 

Trump was resolute about ending illegal immigration and protecting Americans, and all witnessed how the establishment felt about that. With full establishment might, liberals fought his security initiatives tooth and nail. They mocked Trump, claimed walls wouldn’t work, delayed, withheld funding—all while executing a treasonous plot to dispense with his presidency, incidentally. It all draws a very simple, clear, and incontrovertible conclusion: American leadership was ever serious about stopping illegal immigration. In fact, it was the direct opposite. 

Per a criminal incident or negative data involving illegals, the citizenry would become angry about the lawless invasion, insecurity, and expense. Leaders would then address the matter publicly just to appear they were aware and doing something about it. The public anger would eventually dissipate, and the issue would be intentionally shelved. Until anger arose again, where it was then likewise mollified, and the issue shelved again.  

In other words, there was no intention of solving the immigration problem. Hence, the incontrovertible fact:  

America’s immigration system isn’t “broken.” It’s immigration laws simply aren’t being enforced. That’s it; that’s all—which must be intentional because the solution is insanely simple. 

Anybody could fix this problem if they really wanted to. What do people do when they want a place for their dog to run and play securely outside? They go to the hardware store, purchase some lumber and nails, and erect a fence. Problem solved. Likewise, what do people do when they want to stop illegals from infiltrating their nation? They make the initiative a priority and marshal all law enforcement and the military to the task—which is precisely what Donald Trump did and was despised by America’s leadership class for doing. 

Now, why would they despise him for it? They’d been complaining about illegal immigration for decades, even passed a bill to build a wall. “We have to do more,” Clinton said. “We’re a nation of laws,” Obama lashed, and illegals “broke those laws.” Leaders clearly recognized the lawlessness, financial injustice, and national peril. So why then oppose Trump’s immigration initiatives so vehemently and work so hard to defeat them? 

Because leadership wanted illegal immigration all along! 

There is no other conclusion. 

It simply took Trump to expose that fact. In fact, it took Trump to expose a lot of nefarious facts about America’s leadership class, which is precisely why he is the establishment’s—republicans and democrats alike—Enemy Number One.  

Immigration systems don’t break, and aren’t broken. That’s a ruse to facilitate desired and transformative illegal immigration, and ultimately an attack on the nation. And if a government facilitates an attack on its own nation, with whom is it then aligned?  

The enemy?  
Or the people it’s paid to serve and protect? 

Something is broken, alright. And it’s not an immigration system. 

©JMW 12/23 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside. 

Palestinian Muslims attack Jews in their Israeli homes—beheading infants and children, raping young girls, and slaughtering the elderly—and “President” Joe Biden is concerned about Islamophobia and rising hatred for Muslims. It’s beyond absurd, of course, given the aggressors. But why would Muslim well-being be Biden’s concern? 

Biden couldn’t care less about Muslims. Just like he doesn’t care about American auto workers, that he doesn’t work for. That’s what he barked—“I don’t work for you!”— to a group of hard hatted, blue collar union men, who nonetheless pay Biden’s salary. Biden can run his aggressive, intimidating mouth at the auto worker because he knows there will be a swarm of security come to his rescue, and because he knows the auto worker understands the law doesn’t favor him in a physical altercation with an elected official. 

Interestingly, a Google search of the incident returns, “Fact Check: did Biden say I don’t work for you to an American auto worker? False.” False? 

… and yet there’s Biden on video, before everyone’s very eyes and ears, saying precisely that. 

This “Fact Check” system doesn’t seem to be functioning properly.  

Biden couldn’t care less about Muslims, just like he doesn’t care about the Indians who work at 7/11 and Dunkin’ Donuts in Delaware, or anywhere else in the nation. Just like he doesn’t care about African Americans, readily lynching them high-tech-style to prevent seating them on the supreme court. Just like he doesn’t care about the constitution and rule of law, and about selling out his country to the highest international bidder via the Biden Family Crime Syndicate.  

Like every liberal, Joe Biden cares about Joe Biden, and definitely not Muslims. So, if Islamophobia and rising Muslim hatred aren’t Joe Biden concerns or policies, then, whose are they?  

Muslim well-being is a Barack Obama concern and policy—the Hand of the Incapacitated King.  

Biden’s policies don’t “mirror” Obama’s policies; they are Obama policies, right down to Muslim well-being and the Muslim religion’s proliferation. All his corrupt personnel still ensconced in the White House, along with his treasonous collusion co-conspirators in the FBI, CIA, and DOJ. Obama is enjoying an illegal third term. And we’re fully aware of his Islamic ties: publicly, and accidentally, professing his Muslim faith to George Stephanopoulos at ABC News; keeping company with outspoken and ferocious antisemite, Louis Farrakhan, a picture of the cavorting pair intentionally concealed for years for fear it might cost Obama the 2008 election.  

Despite what he says, despite the image he portrays, Obama is an antisemite—behavior never lies. He’s what Muslims have been all along, since Malcolm X and all the rest: despisers of Jews and the Jewish nation, and at their core, Marxist communists. Simply, Obama and his contemporary Muslim brothers and sisters are the latest iteration of Naziism—only with different skin color and brown eyes, instead of Aryan blue. And staunch Jewish liberals are not only noticing, but taking issue. 

Comedian Bill Maher, for example, accused Obama of pushing a moral equivalency—Obama suggesting in public remarks that Hamas and Israel were both to blame, and that no one had “clean hands.” “All of us are complicit,” Obama said, which “disappointed” Maher. And after logically filleting Obama, Maher told him, “So, enough with the moral equivalencies.” Maher railed against journalists, too, 750 having signed an open letter urging newsrooms to embrace terms like “apartheid” and “genocide” to describe Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.  

Maher: “They couldn’t be more pro-[terrorist].” Furthermore, how do these journalists characterize an unprovoked, murderous Muslim attack on infants, children, young girls, and the elderly? 

Harvard Law professor emeritus, Alan Dershowitz, said his relationship with Obama is “over” and that he’s never talking to him again. “I think he always had a deep hatred of Israel [of Jews, to be clear] in his heart,” Dershowitz said. “He hid it very well. He called me to the Oval Office, and he said to me, ‘Alan, you’ve known me for a long time. You know I have Israel’s back.’ I didn’t realize he meant to paint a target on it. He’s never been supportive of Israel. And finally, his true feelings have come out now that he’s no longer president and doesn’t have to be elected. He has contributed enormously to the problem because he is respected among young people. And if he says the occupation is unbearable and that anything can be done to stop it, he is encouraging people to engage in their antisemitic, anti-Israel and anti-American attitudes. He should be ashamed of himself. He should apologize, but he won’t.” 

To clearly and accurately paraphrase Dershowitz: Obama is a liar, is a ravenous, murderous Muslim wolf in sheep’s clothing. And the evidence clearly demonstrates that it’s not only true, but okay to say. 

Lesson: apparently, the only thing that inspires Jewish revolt in the Liberalism/Muslim cult is the rising aroma of world hatred for Jews and the potential for more gas chamber construction. Clearly, and understandably, liberal Jews value their own skin more than the cult. 

These Obama Muslims tell us not to be afraid, that they are good, peaceful Muslims, as opposed to these terrorist sorts. So, given what this Muslim terrorist faction did to the Jews on October 7^th, where is Obama’s defense of “good” Muslims and his scathing rebuke and renunciation of this so-called separate terrorist faction? There has been neither. Instead, Obama says what he must, that, while what these Muslims did to Israelis is horrific, the Jews need to now pursue peace and a two-state solution, both of which Israel has already done, and clearly to no avail. 

Isn’t it interesting how Muslims win in Obama’s prescription, and Israel loses? Wonder if that means anything? 

Incidentally, this is how Muslims end you: kill the enemy off thousands at time via a brutal attack, demand a ceasefire and peace talks after to prevent retribution. Then kill thousands more later and demand another ceasefire and round of peace talks. Until eventually, there is no enemy left. 

Mission complete! Jews cease to exist, and the Muslim Nation is at full strength, and ready to conquer more lands and people.

Defending yourself and aggressively killing Muslims in return?  

Why, it’s not only a disproportionate response and injustice, but inhuman. 

Realize that evil’s best, most effective weapon is simple accusation, specifically public accusation. Evil does whatever it wants, and then accuses you when you righteously complain and fight back. It is an extremely effective tactic merely because people are deathly afraid of public criticism and scorn.  

Well, when the criticism and scorn occur, here’s a verbal tool for that—to be used with authority and an air of impending war: 

F— you. All of you. 

Evil is a massive con, a cult populated by the pathetic. It/they should be treated accordingly. 

Why should anyone of reputation and righteousness care about the criticisms of corrupt, immoral, self-important frauds? 

As president, Obama had no problem criticizing and snubbing Israel’s new prime minister. The Jewish nation saw fit to democratically elect Binyamin Netanyahu, and Obama not only refused to call and congratulate him—Netanyahu and Israel longstanding American allies, no less. Obama criticized the new prime minister, the people’s choice. Why the snub and criticism? 

Because Obama is a Jew-despising Muslim. Actually, it’s more pointed than that. Obama is a conservative Jew-despising Muslim.  

After Netanyahu’s election, Israeli journalist, Aluf Benn, a liberal Jew, complained that Netanyahu deployed the politics of fear in his victory, and claimed the tactic worked like magic: 

“Blaming a cabal of ‘foreign money,’ the Obama administration, and a hostile media for ‘aiming at ousting him and electing a leftist government relying on Arabs,’ Netanyahu appealed to the primal fear of his political base.” 

Only, Netanyahu was right, and Israelis should have been primally afraid. Because Obama was trying to oust Netanyahu and to accomplish an Israeli government of Arab Muslims—the enemy from within, like liberals to America. Meanwhile, Obama was arranging nuclear weapons for Iran, too, Israel’s primary, dedicated, and fiercest Muslim enemy, who no less prays and chants for Israel’s death daily. 

Gee, what are the implications in this scenario? 

Here’s one: Obama is a Jew-despising Muslim who wants to rid the world of Israel and the Jews, or to at least enslave them.

The fact, abundantly clear, is there’s no difference between “terrorist” Muslims and Obama brand Muslims. Towards the Jews, all have the same hatred and goal. Hence, there’s (a) the cult’s political face and (b) its henchmen. Or rather, there’s Vito Corleone and Luca Brasi. One to provide legitimacy and assurances to the public, the other to do that one’s bloody, evil bidding, say, in Israeli homes on October 7^th. 

So, proof that the Hand of the Incapacitated King is actually the king, Islamophobia and the rising hatred for Muslims are Barack Obama’s concerns, and political efforts to protect and proliferate the cult, his policies. He’s worried about a world backlash against the Nation of Islam, a justifiable concern given the October 7^th brutality of his cult’s henchmen, not to exclude 9/11 and the countless other Muslim atrocities around the world. Inhuman religious brutality Obama doesn’t condemn in his heart, mind you, but only publicly. Because he wants the same thing, while maintaining this phony ideological dividing line between “good” and terrorist Muslims for appearances and cover.  

But there is no dividing line, and the reassurances of Muslim “goodness” are solely for the infidels.  

Muslims know the truth. Per Obama’s behavior—snubbing and criticizing Netanyahu, arranging nuclear weapons for Iran, getting angry at Trump for declaring Jerusalem Israel’s capital and confirming the Jewish nation—the cult understands what Obama is saying, and why. It’s necessary political speak, and cover.  

Allying with the Jews, those stinking pigs—nothing insults and infuriates Muslims more.  

The Muslim quest isn’t peace. All who defy the Muslim religion and Allah are infidels worthy of death, and anyone who doesn’t convert deserves the sentence. Clearly, the Muslim agenda is world domination. And to accomplish the mission, they’re concealing the fact that terrorists Muslims and “good” Muslims, these Obama-brand Muslims, are really one and the same.  

In the miniseries, Band of Brothers, after the Nazis surrendered and were walking, in column, defeatedly down a local highway. A wearied and angry American soldier took occasion to righteously rail at them: 

“You stupid kraut bastards! Dragging our asses halfway around the world. Interrupting our lives. For what?! You ignorant, servile scum! What the fuck are we doing here! Huh?!”

In other words, how could these people ever subscribe to the utter lunacy of Hitler and cause so much needless human hardship, death, and world destruction? 

Things seldom appear as we imagine them. What does an evil communist takeover of a country or the world look like anyway? It looks like politics at first, which is why an invasion of evil is so difficult to recognize. Eventually, it looks like darkness and death, a manifest wickedness all can then certify and sanction. The world heard all the Nazi and Japanese rhetoric before World War II. It saw the incremental military movements to service evil’s objective. The world knew, but it couldn’t imagine the bloody, macabre result—330,000 American citizens alone dead, many more permanently injured or maimed.  

And if evil hadn’t been defeated in these European and Pacific theaters, how different would the world look today? How differently would life be lived? 

Infinitely worse than we would ever wrongly imagine. 

The world had its respective national asses dragged halfway around the world because evil didn’t appear to be evil quickly enough, which, indeed, is hard to recognize until invading shores, collecting human remains, and digging graves. All because evil is unrecognized and politically pacified.  

Evil wants destruction, death, and slaves. This being exactly what Muslims seek, perhaps the wisest course of infidel action is embodied by a phrase: 

Early recognition and preemption. 

As Vito Corleone advised his son Michael, “Whoever comes to you with this Barzini meeting, he’s the traitor. Don’t forget that.” Joe Biden is a nearly mindless, incapacitated fool being used by someone, or rather, something else. That is the evil of our time, and don’t forget that. 

In fact, now is the time to address it.

©JMW 11/2023 

All Rights Reserved 

*This article contains opinion. Excellent opinion.

JMW’s Latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside. 

Getting the drop on modern liberals isn’t so difficult, just think like an evil criminal. Actually, we should import some distinction into the idea. To get the drop on liberal voters, liberalism’s rank and file, one doesn’t have to do any thinking at all. Mindless robots, liberal voters accept and believe whatever their “elite” betters tell them and regurgitate it. Zero intellect involved. 

And that’s not a snarky criticism; that’s what they do. 

Like climate change, for instance. Or racism. Or Donald Trump colluding with Vladimir Putin to steal the 2016 presidential election. “Elite” liberals proclaim it. Liberal voters believe it, sans any evidence at all, incidentally, which shows how vacuous and eager they are to serve. Then they mindlessly repeat it. Until it’s proven untrue, that is, upon which they pretend they were unaware and couldn’t care less.  

It highlights a critical fallacy, that liberal voters don’t know when something they believed and publicly espoused is proven false. It’s an absurd perception. Liberal voters desperately wanted Trump guilty and imprisoned, for example, because that’s what their “elite” betters wanted. Thus, the rank and file followed the news the same as their pro-Trump opponents, and with the same zealous interest in the verdict. Then, waiting with bated breath, they see Special Counsel Mueller’s exoneration, and Trump vindicated. They see Special Counsel Durham testifying the FBI had no lawful reason to investigate or spy on Trump, and that the whole thing was driven by a Hillary Clinton dossier fiction, no less sanctioned by President Obama. And it’s all not only painfully disappointing.  

Liberal voters know.  

Like everyone else, they know the whole thing was a phony, treasonous plot per their “elite” betters; it can’t be anything else. They could organize the implications and map out the conclusions, too, and change their perspectives and beliefs. But that requires scrutiny and intellectual honesty. It requires thinking, which simply isn’t them.  

Mindless servility, that’s the liberal rank and file.  

No? Exhibit A: 

The “elite” betters immediately after the 2016 election: “Trump and Putin stole the election!” 
Liberal voters: “Trump’s presidency is illegitimate!”  

No evidence. No facts. No supporting information at all, actually. Just specious accusation. Yet, liberal voters are all-in, fully onboard. Believers! 

How do people do that, anyway? Jump headlong into a belief without any evidence whatsoever for it?  

Seems rather, mindless. 

So, to get the drop on liberal voters, one need only understand this mindless robot concept. Given they are actual human beings with the capacity for critical thought and analysis, however, one is then obliged to see them for what they truly are: willful ideological prisoners and servile cult members. 

And that’s not a snarky criticism, either; that’s what they are [Ref. Exhibit A]. 

These “elite” liberals, on the other hand, the cult’s leaders, they aren’t mindless robots. No sir! And to get the drop on these people, one must think criminally. Or rather, evilly. After all, that’s what criminality is: evil. Crime and lawlessness certainly aren’t “good” things. They’re acts of evil. Acts with which these “elite” liberals are clearly enamored, too, which then makes liberalism an evil cult.  

Let’s face it, when people create a collusion hoax and knowingly aim to ruin people’s lives with it, use the federal government and national news media to sell it, and people accept and espouse the hoax without any supporting evidence, because they desperately want it to be true, and then ceaselessly repeat the lie, only to learn it was a treasonous plot hatched by people they trust and believe, a fact they then mindlessly ignore, along with their poor judgment and the utter turpitude of their leaders.   

Why, that’s just a big ol’ bursting bag of evil, folks. 

A cult of evil, one might accurately surmise. 

So, to get the drop on these “elite” liberals, one must think criminally, or like evil people think, which is a completely foreign concept to lawful, moral people. Moral people can’t relate at all. They think, How could people create a hoax and carelessly ruin the lives of others with it? And, How could people learn that such careless people were involved in a hoax, and not acknowledge the evil and criminality, and their own poor judgement? 

How? They’re evil. The entire lot. And in all this careless ruination and defiance, they aren’t just shameless and unaffected. They feel righteous! Feel they’re doing God’s work, which they are: the work of their human betters and their own political gods. 

It’s delusional, of course, but these are people of utter darkness. It’s hard not to be disoriented and delusional living in utter darkness. Meanwhile, there’s the blazing light of truth: the collusion hoax and the treasonous fraud of liberalism, of the cult, bright as the sun. And there are liberals one and all: shielding their eyes and running as fast and as far away as they can from it, like vampires. Evil vampires.  

“Crossover, children. Go into the light; there’s peace and serenity in the light.” 

Eh, they’re out of earshot. 

In every dispute, all anyone has to do is step into the light of truth, and into the subsequent understanding and peace it so graciously affords. Rank and file liberals may not like it that Trump didn’t steal the election, and that their “elite” betters are evil, plotting criminals. But it’s nonetheless true. Simply accepting the truth, the rank and file can enjoy understanding and peace, instead of utter darkness, endless acrimony, and misery.  

Seems like an easy call. 

In any event, evil guides evil people. Thus, if good people want to get the drop on the liberal hierarchy, evil thinking is compulsory, if completely unnatural. So, let’s practice … 

One of the hot topics currently is whether Joe Biden will run for president in 2024. Listening to conservative pundits discuss the matter, I suddenly realized the modern conservative punditry’s lack of vision. Rush Limbaugh dies and the whole enterprise goes to scat. If the punditry wants to be on the “cutting edge of societal evolution,” then they’d better find the baseline in political matters.  

No one was better at reading liberals than Limbaugh, who knew them like “every square inch of [his] glorious naked body.” Well, Limbaugh had a secret that made his analysis superior. A faithful man with “talent on loan from God,” he understood that liberalism was evil, and that members were fierce and determined opponents of everything good and righteous, despite their façade, their sheep’s clothing, of dogooderness. Thus, Limbaugh was able to read liberals with mind-boggling astuteness and accuracy—which isn’t so mind-boggling, really, but a simple good v. evil read. The baseline in all matters, political and otherwise. 

In other words, Limbaugh understood liberals were criminals, arrogant and evil human beings with no respect for not just the law, God’s or man’s, but for human beings, either. Liberals not only exploit people, which is evil. They enjoy it! Hence, political analysis is made easy: whatever is good, whatever morally binds human beings and societies together, liberals aim to not only destroy it, but to control the slavish, evil hell on the other side—like, communists. 

It is to say, there is nefariousness in every single thing liberals do, specifically these hierarchical “elites.”   

These “elites” don’t do things willy-nilly. They are organized, driven by purpose. Question: if God and morality piss them off, and if they despise the current law, God’s and man’s—the constitution, and reject both openly. Then what is their political objective?  

The objectives are many, but the driving force behind them all is destruction and evil. It would be one thing if liberals were trying to persuade voters and bring about societal change in the voting booth: if the citizenry wants evil, then they can vote for it and choose us. But liberals are executing treasonous coups, rigging elections, and trying to enforce change, instead—like, communists. 

A quick note about Marxists/communists: it’s not that people belong to some Marxist club, where they gather every Friday to encourage each other and discuss world domination over brie and merlot. It’s simply people who subscribe to evil and the destruction and misery that accompanies it. Misery they want spread to everyone, incidentally, so that everyone feels as despairing and wretched as them. Despite having a club headquarters, the Democrat National Committee, these people don’t need weekly gatherings. Unified by darkness and misery, members each know their function—even the mindless robots. 

And liberals know something else, too: free people don’t relinquish their liberty to misery and evil so easily. Hence the lies, treasonous plots, and sheep’s clothing. 

So, “elite” liberals are organized criminals driven by evil. Listening to the conservative punditry, I wondered why they didn’t get that, why it wasn’t driving their analysis, why it wasn’t the baseline from which their analysis was fashioned. Is a good and evil basis too religious and thorny for them? Too, uncool? Too, Billy Graham and Joel Osteen? It isn’t clear. What is acceptable is the same old benign, tired strategic political analysis of yesteryear: I don’t see how Joe Biden can run, which leaves Kamala Harris, who can’t win because nobody likes her. My eye is on California governor, Gavin Newsome.  

And this wasn’t the analysis of Tik-Tok’ers; these were prominent conservative voices. Meanwhile, Biden and his fellow traitors are up to their ears in crime, er, evil deeds.  

So, why doesn’t the conservative punditry understand? Why don’t they get it?  

They don’t get it because they aren’t thinking like evil criminals. Thus, they lack the vision and baseline wisdom necessary for accurate, compelling, top-shelf political analysis. Getting the drop on evil criminals demands thinking like them, which is not only compulsory, but in fact divinely instructed. Christ advised the world’s good people to be “wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” He meant: you’re sheep among wolves. Be kind and compassionate, but deftly understand the evil world in which you live and the evil people who long for your demise.  

How many serpents do you see in the open and vulnerable? How many doves? 

Acutely aware of their environment, serpents are cautious, and wise. 

Thinking criminally, evilly, is more natural than people might realize, however. Why do people explore their homes for weak defenses and add locks, chains, deadbolts, and alarm systems? To prevent easy access for thieves and theft of their stuff, of course. Why are Californians leaving their car windows down and “nothing of value” notes on their dashboards? To keep crooks from smashing the windows and searching for merchandise. Watching crime shows on television, criminally savvy viewers are rather quick to deduce, It was the professor, in the conservatory, with a candlestick.  

So, criminal thinking and evil aren’t unfamiliar to people. Perhaps the problem in this case is that they just aren’t used to viewing politicians and their own government that way, when they most certainly should. Biden’s 2024 presidential run offers the perfect case study. 

— 

The Obama administration executed a treasonous coup; an established fact now beyond dispute, the lack of punishment for the crime notwithstanding. Involving the entire liberal establishment, the crime has been the governing factor in every establishment action since. Important to our case study, however, the crime also involved our subject: then Vice President Joe Biden.  

Biden was right there, in the thick of things, a central player in this crime of crimes.  

Here, for efficacy, let’s utilize the bullhorn. This is a critical point in the examination, and people can’t help but pay attention to bullhorns: 

High-frequency whistling<<<: THESE PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS, FOLKS. NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER! PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY OF STATE, DIRECTORS OF THE CIA, FBI, DOJ. THE PRESTIGIOUS TITLES ARE MEANINGLESS. THESE ARE EVIL CRIMINALS, PURE AND SIMPLE.  

Okay, let’s continue … 

In response to criminal exposure, the entire establishment did its best for four years to destroy Donald Trump, the Exposer In Chief, but failed. In 2020, the criminals needed desperately to control the presidency, a necessary tool on its own, so they could control the attorney general appointment—the deciding authority in all legal matters and controller of the criminal’s fate.  

Now. If you’re an evil, treasonous criminal prior to the 2020 election, who do you need in the White House? Bernie Sanders? Kamala Harris? Or any one of the other 20 or so primary candidates vying for the democrat nomination? 

None on that list will do. They aren’t original, core conspirators. Aiders and abettors, perhaps, but not core conspirators. You can’t control outsiders who aren’t party to the consequences.  

In selecting a candidate, think: mutually assured destruction. 

If you’re a treasonous criminal, you need an original, core conspirator in the White House, an insider with skin in the game. In the entire democrat primary field, there was only one such necessity: Joe Biden. 

Who, amazingly, won the democrat primary and nomination. 
Who, amazingly, won the presidency, too. 

In the primary’s beginnings, Biden was basically roadkill. In Iowa he finished fourth. In New Hampshire he finished fifth, the choice of only one out of every 12 voters. And in Nevada he finished second, with but a paltry 20% of the vote. Then, the Biden magic suddenly took over.  

South Carolina’s James Clyburn, congress’ highest-ranking black member, stepped-up to tell the party’s African American voters that Biden was their man. Clyburn’s support all but guaranteed Biden would carry the Black vote, or so they said. But it did more than that—it created a groundswell of energy for Biden’s campaign. The following weekend, Biden got half the South Carolina vote and thrashed the competition. After South Carolina, Clyburn’s super-galactic persuasive power clearly spilling over to the rest of the nation, longtime front-runner Bernie Sanders won but four of the remaining primary states, and Biden took ten, becoming the democrat nominee and ultimately president. 

Now. Let’s look at this scenario criminally … 

James Clyburn was a man of such powerful political persuasion that democrats in 14 different states and in all the cities, counties, and towns therein, suddenly said, Well, if James Clyburn says it, then Biden must be our man!  

Is that what we’re saying? And believing?  

It’s a guarantee that most democrats in the remaining 14 states had never even heard of James Clyburn. The fact is voters were soundly rejecting Biden in early primary voting. And now, for “James Clyburn’s” super-galactic reputation and public support, Biden becomes the premiere candidate to voters who’ve never heard of Clyburn?  

It defies belief, obviously. So, thinking criminally, what was Clyburn’s role in this farce?  

Try this: 

Approached by Hillary Clinton or Obama—Democrat Party leaders and original, core conspirators, remember—or solicited by respective surrogates, Clyburn was told he could make a real difference for Biden and the party if he’d issue his support, which, the ever-faithful liberal, Clyburn, was more than willing to do.  

Question: why Biden?  

Well, we know why. Biden is an original, core conspirator. A fellow traitor whose coconspirators needed in the White House to: (a) fill the ever so critical attorney general position and (b) to continue the destruction of America and complete the communist takeover intended via the original plot, which most assuredly took place.  

The criminals weren’t going to expose themselves or their crime to outsiders, weren’t going to compromise themselves, the mission, and provide political leverage to Clyburn or anyone else. It’s Treasonous Coup 101: no one outside the circle can know!  

Thus, Clyburn was almost certainly being used—a patsy, a useful idiot. The criminals needed a way to conceal their impending crime: rigging the upcoming primary and general elections, same as they did in 2016. Sold to the news media and public would be: Why, the venerable Jim Clyburn’s support marshaled democrat voters nationwide! Democrats know who they can trust: Jim Clyburn and Joe Biden—our next president!  

Of course, no democrats outside of South Carolina knew who Clyburn was, but that isn’t the point. Clyburn was cover. His support would be the reason for Biden’s inexplicable rise from the primary ashes and electoral victories, not the upcoming crime, which had to be committed for obvious reasons. 

Biden had to win, had to secure the democrat nomination and the White House. Victory was imperative for the criminals’ survival and the ongoing plot. So how did the criminals—Obama, his FBI, CIA, DOJ, DHS—rig the 2020 primary and general elections?  

If American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are doing their jobs, and given the tools that they possess to do those jobs, which General Jack Keane said “would make the American people’s eyes water” if they ever knew the capabilities. It would be impossible to rig an election, just as Obama himself said. Yet. we know the elections were rigged and, to that, two key questions: 

(a) with whom are these agencies ideologically and incontrovertibly aligned? Liberals.  
(b) who did the agencies conspiratorially assist in the ongoing treasonous coup? The Democrat Party. 

Thus, alliances confirmed. 

While Obama and his FBI were criminally spying on Donald Trump and people in his orbit, the Obama White House and CIA were criminally unmasking American citizens at will.  “Criminally” the operative term, in both cases. Otherwise known as: evil. Because lawlessness and criminality can’t be classified as: good. 

So, what we’re highlighting here are the tools of power, and the ability to affect elections with that power and those tools. If elections can be rigged, and we know they can, who has the power and the “eye watering” tools with which to do it? The FBI and CIA—and the Department of Justice, too, by neither investigating nor prosecuting voter fraud. And we can add the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to this list, also.  

And let’s be crystal clear about this power and these tools … 

Whenever these agencies surveil a target, for example, they can monitor all the target’s electronic communications. That means email, instant messaging and live chat, website and blogs, SMS/text messaging, phone and voicemail, video, which means looking directly into the target’s home and perhaps bedroom via smart televisions, laptop and phone cameras, and webcams.  

“Intrusive” isn’t the term for all this. Evil and perilous are more like it.  

The agencies aren’t supposed to be able to invade people’s privacy like this without surveillance warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). But then, they aren’t supposed to execute treasonous coups, lie to FISA courts, and spy on and unmask American citizens at will, either. Thus, the question: what happens when these agencies, the people in them and running them, are politically corrupt, criminal, and evil, which they have unquestionably proven themselves to be? 

Well, it means blackmail. It means treasonous coups and political corruption. It means control of government and elections. It means peril for free people and free societies at the hands of evil. 

More and more people realizing the evil that is liberalism, how are liberals to then continue winning elections? Do you think treasonous conspirators bent on a communist transformation intend to leave themselves vulnerable to democracy and the will of the people?  

Of course not. They’re going to rig elections and dispense with the vulnerability.  

And in fact, they’re doing it.  

No matter what one thinks about the potential outcome, that, numbers-wise, liberals wouldn’t have to rig elections to win. Liberals must rig elections. Because the evil authoritarian abuse they have in store will most certainly be rejected by voters eventually.  

And that, folks, shall not be allowed to happen. Evil doesn’t compromise. 

Democracy and elections must cease to exist, replaced with the illusion of democracy and public participation, which is precisely what is occurring now. 

So how do the FBI and CIA rig elections? Beyond secretly plotting to prevent and cancel the electorate’s choice, they allow voter fraud. They allow internet access to voter databases by hostile actors; access to voting machines via the internet; fraudulent mail-in ballots. The FBI, CIA, and DHS are America’s law enforcement and national security, and should not allow these things to occur.  

Well, this should be left to state authorities, hapless liberal voters would say.  

Okay. Michigan law enforcement and the state’s attorney general all agreed that massive 2020 voter fraud took place in their state, which was discovered to be a national operation, too. They investigated, made the case, and sent the evidence to the FBI in 2021. What happened? 

Nothing. 
Nothing at the FBI.  
Nothing at the CIA. 
Nothing at the DHS.  
Nothing at the Department of Injustice, either. 

See the problem?   

This is how these elite authorities, this criminal syndicate, rigs elections. People with not only the task but the “eye watering” tools to stop criminals and keep elections secure, but who nonetheless ignore massive, ubiquitous, and undeniable voter fraud—while inventing collusion hoaxes and crimes against their political opposition, no less.  

Gee, a nation’s law enforcement and intelligence institutions having political enemies. Pretty sure that translates to corruption, which involves criminality, which we know to be evil. 

And let’s not be naïve, either. These elite authorities don’t need to merely allow voter fraud. The tools at their disposal, they could simply insert votes into the tally that a particular and preferred candidate needs via the same internet, e.g. Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential victory. Biden is significantly behind in the vote count, vote counting center inexplicably, uncharacteristically shuts down, reopens hours later, and Biden emerges not-so-magically ahead.  

Why, where did all those votes come from? Why did we have to shut down vote counting when all the votes are there in house? So electronic vote fraud could take place, perhaps? 

Point is, if the elite authorities will allow others to muck around in America’s elections electronically, the authorities can muck around in America’s election’s, too. And haven’t they mucked around: collusion fraud, the Biden laptop and 51 former intelligence officials, paying CIA officials to change their view about covid origin? 

Undeniably. 

Well, how many times have they done it?  
For how long, how many elections cycles, have they done it?  
And if they were doing it, how would anyone but them know? 
But for Trump’s victory, no one would’ve ever known about the treasonous plot, certainly. 

Per treasonous success in 2016, imagine Obama and new President Hillary Clinton arm-in-arm at her victory celebration, extolling the virtues of “sacred democracy” and the wisdom of American voters. Imagine FBI Director James Comey, Peter Strozk, Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page, Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Brennan, Clapper, Christopher Steele and the whole conspiratorial cast all touting election security and free and fair elections.  

And there sit the American people—their leaders chosen for them by evil criminals and none the wiser. It’s a scenario that actually happened in 2020, and in both cases one thing is certain: it wasn’t Trump the criminals were trying to usher to the presidency.  

Again, alliances confirmed. 

The modern conservative punditry makes arguments regarding republican election losses: Trump’s hand-picked candidates mostly lost in Georgia. And, The voters in Pennsylvania favored Fetterman, not Dr. Oz. How do Trump voters explain that? 

Well, did the hand-picked candidates really lose?  
Did voters really prefer Fetterman over Dr. Oz?  
Are liberals really winning elections nationwide?  

People keep saying, Why do voters in failing liberal cities keep voting for liberals?! Well, are the voters in these cities really voting for liberals, and crime and squalor? Are liberals such cunning deceivers that voters will deny the societal decrepitude before their very eyes?  

What if these treasonous criminals have had their hand in the outcome—not dictating every election to avoid suspicion, but only the races critical to power and the cause? We know for certain they were involved in a treasonous plot, and that they are ignoring voter and election fraud that would benefit the opposition. Four indictments and impending court cases and counting, we know the criminals despise Donald Trump, or are scared to death of him, one, or both.  

So then, to protect themselves from exposure and punishment, and to advance their communist mission, why not rig elections and secure the outcome? And if so, who but them would know?  

Some say it hasn’t gotten bad enough for people to wake-up to what liberals are doing to the country. Well, what if people know it’s bad, are awake, are voting against liberals, and the criminals are simply cancelling their votes and controlling election outcomes? They certainly have the tools to do it.

And worse … 

These conspirators are known criminals. Evil villains who have escaped punishment purely for their control of the institutions and agencies who would normally expose and punish them. Are they and their crimes served by not rigging elections and by not allowing voter fraud? Doesn’t the election of anyone but them into positions of authority and control spell potential doom? Doesn’t Trump’s relentless persecution demonstrate that? 

It’s all “conspiracy theory” until we acknowledge these people are evil criminals who’ve been caught committing treason. It’s all conspiracy theory until we acknowledge these are evil criminals who are also amending Democrat Party primary rules to lockout their own party’s primary candidate, Robert Kennedy, to guarantee Biden’s presidency; who have the leading republican candidate mired in  mass of manufactured litigation; and who attempted a sweetheart plea deal to close the door on Biden and Obama era crime forever, and to guarantee a Biden presidency. 

So, to the conservative punditry: doesn’t it seem the criminals are desperate to ensure that Biden remains in office? Yes? Well, why is that?  

Here’s a perspective: if republicans and conservatives were involved in all this, and if Trump, the GOP, and conservatism were benefiting. These same authorities, with their powerful anti-crime tools, would be all over it like a fat kid on cake. Yet it’s liberals and liberalism benefiting, and the authorities are absent. Again, why is that? 

Because they’re evil communist criminals attempting to upend a nation and arrest authoritarian control of its citizenry, the American people.  

When the conservative punditry understands that concept and uses it as the basis for opinion and analysis, only then will they be on the “cutting edge of societal evolution.” Anything else is just, below average opinion and analysis. Note: the political analysis of yesterday is inept, and over. 

Everyone knows Biden is guilty of his current alleged crimes, bribery and money laundering—even liberal voters. Bank receipts don’t lie. Even so, the criminals can’t afford to lose him, can’t afford an outsider to be Commander In Chief, because that’s how they control things. Thus, they can’t afford a legal case against Biden, either. Not because Biden is so valuable and irreplaceable, but because he’s a conspirator, and because a trial exposes Barrack Obama and the entire conspiracy. It’s why the conspirators’ hand-picked attorney general, Merrick Garland, tried to slip a plea deal past Judge Noreika and put the entire Biden, and ultimately the coup matter, to plea-arranged rest.  

And no, Biden isn’t running the country; he can barely put two sentences together. The conspirators, the criminals, are making the decisions, which is abundantly clear. Himself compromised, Biden must do what they say, too, which explains his agenda’s precise reflection of Obama’s Marxist agenda, the Conspirator In Chief. 

So, when wondering why the news media hasn’t yet, despite years of accumulating and verified evidence, climbed aboard this raging dumpster fire that is Biden Family crime. It’s because the original, core criminals don’t know yet how to handle the matter. Because the criminals don’t know how to handle the matter, the news media, a conspirator itself, doesn’t know how to address it. Unlike the original collusion plot, there has been no signal, no perceivable course of action. Originally, the criminals proclaimed that Trump had colluded with Putin to steal the election, and the news media immediately took flight with the story. That was their signal; they knew exactly what to do. In contrast, there is all this undeniable criminality involving Biden, the affirming evidence stacked literally to the Oversight Committee rafters. And yet the news media is silent.  

Silent because they haven’t had their cue. 

And they haven’t had their cue because the criminals need an insider, an original core conspirator, in the White House and don’t know what to do. And when you don’t know what to do, and when you can’t do anything else, you do nothing. You ride this jeopardy-ridden nightmare out.  

People think liberals are so cunning, so superior in their political and legal acumen. When, here they are, flying by the seat of their pants and becoming increasingly more desperate and obvious. They were arrogant, got out over their treacherous skis. Now here they are, forced to keep a doddering, demented criminal in the White House. 

As a result, Biden can do anything. He can wander aimlessly through White House shrubbery on the way to the door; dementedly walk out of an ongoing a medal ceremony; shake hands with invisible people; fall again and again; fall over on his bicycle; mumble unintelligibly; say weird nonsensical things; tell stories everyone knows are false. Nothing is too disqualifying or humiliating, because the criminals are trapped and can’t afford to lose him. They can’t afford physician analysis of his mental health, and therefore won’t allow it; can’t afford him to be in public more than necessary, to answer tough, unscripted questions without notecards; can’t afford to respond to his verified familial corruption; and most certainly, can’t afford a trial regarding these vice-presidential crimes, which would lead directly to the criminals and their treasonous conspiracy. 

Why install a doddering, demented criminal in the White House?  

Because he’s an original core conspirator and there are no other options. 
Because your treasonous plot can/must continue.  
Because your exposure and punishment can be controlled. 
Mainly, because you need him there. 

At least, that’s how evil criminals think. 

It’s just not debatable anymore. America is in the middle of a historic crime, an evil communist coup masquerading as normal politics. That’s the goal, to make everything seem normal, like the everyday bickering between political parties, the ideological push and pull over issues. No news about a coup. No trials involving conspirators. No unnecessary attention to the goings on behind a clearly ailing and broken presidential façade. Just, politics as usual. That way, the victims—the American people— aren’t alerted and are none the wiser.  

Former House Speaker, Newt Gingrich:  

“There’s, I think, a second reason for dramatically broadening the [Hunter Biden] investigation … this is really about the weaponization of government, the collapse of the rule of law and its replacement by the rule of power. And that really involves three principles. It involves Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden. 

“Remember, when you start getting things like the discovery that Biden wrote under three fake names, Obama by the way also wrote under fake names and of course, Hillary had an entire fake server in her home. Obama and Biden both wrote to her fake server which is totally outside the security rules. I think any investigation has to go way beyond Hunter Biden, who, by the standards of corruption is a small fish … while Obama was president, none of this could have happened without his active knowledge. It’s just not possible.” 

And there it is: accurate, compelling, top-shelf conservative analysis, if years late. Only, Gingrich still avoided a key phrase: evil criminals, which is exactly who these conspirators are, and exactly how they should be publicly characterized every day and at every public opportunity by the entire conservative punditry. Indeed, Obama did know, and gave his consent. And that he knew, it’s impossible that America’s vaunted, highly sophisticated law enforcement and intelligence agencies didn’t know, too, and didn’t execute the ongoing crime at Obama’s behest. 

Otherwise, they would have done their duty and stopped the crime, exposed the crime, and sought punishment for the crime. That’s how the good and evil paradigm works. The good guys pursue and stop the bad guys, the evil criminals.  

Hence, the analysis in this situation is straightforward: the should be good guys are in fact the bad guys, who are not only involved in an evil communist coup, but leading the agencies tasked with stopping criminals like themselves. Given the lengths to which they’ve gone to prevent their exposure and punishment, the minacious question becomes: what further evils might these criminals be willing to commit?  

The alarming truth is, when you’re evil criminals in the middle of a treasonous communist takeover and facing physical, ideological, and political death if you fail. There are no evils you are unwilling to commit, and to compliment the ones you’ve already committed—all in an evil quest to make slaves of an entire nation and citizenry, it should be noted. 

In response, the victims must authoritatively understand the evil world in which they live and the evil people who long for their demise. Because the conflict between good and evil is not just eternal. Ever-present, it baselines the human experience and world affairs. Thus, thinking like the opposition not only makes for accurate, compelling, and top-shelf political opinion and analysis.  

It can be the victims’ saving grace. 

©JMW 9/2023 
All Rights Reserved 

JMW’s latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

The American people must look a little deeper into this establishment concept. Doing so, they’d learn (a) the establishment isn’t exclusively democrat and (b) the forces against America are much more massive and problematic than they realize.  

It is to say, extremely few in Washington are loyal and friendly to the American ideal. 

The establishment is concerned with two things: power, and guaranteeing it has it. And one either opposes that idea, or supports it—supports establishment power and control, that is.  

There is no middle ground. The constitution says so. 

So then, why can’t the republican primary candidates talk about it? Why isn’t it the only thing they are talking about? It should be.  

What is “it,” exactly? 

A treasonous plot—an ongoing treasonous plot—by the Obama administration and his fellow conspirators: Hillary Clinton, America’s own FBI and CIA and DOJ, the Democrat Party, deep state actors, geopolitical players, and nearly the entire national news media, save Fox News.  

Obama and the entire establishment tried to take down a duly elected president in 2016, tried to usurp democracy and ixnay the people’s choice, and used the full and immense power of the federal government to complete and ensure an undeniably communist transformation.  

That’s the charge. The only question is: is it true?  

Because if it is, then nothing else matters. No issue is more important. 

Well, it is true. Irrefutably so.  

In under oath court testimony, Clinton campaign manager, Robby Mook, confessed that Hillary “signed off” on the phony Steele dossier scheme. And she not only signed off; she and the Democrat National Committee (DNC) paid for it, via a laundered draft, an illegal use of campaign finances, as it turned out. Clinton and the DNC were fined by the Federal Elections Commission—a fine quietly issued and paid.  

I can’t speak for everyone, but I’m not paying a fine for something I didn’t do. Because whatever would incur a fine would be (a) illegal and (b) an expense both financial and reputational—equally intolerable. I simply wouldn’t do it. I wouldn’t launder drafts, either, for the same reasons. And if I were criminal enough to do these things, well, I’d quietly manage them … too. 

Gee, laundered payments. What all does that imply, exactly? 

Special Counsel, John Durham, investigated the Russian collusion matter. He concluded there was no lawful predicate for the FBI to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and to spy on Trump’s campaign. Simply, the FBI didn’t have any evidence for the action but Clinton’s fake dossier, which each and every conspirator no less confessed in under oath/penalty-for-perjury testimony—but then said otherwise publicly and while not under oath and penalty of perjury.  

Something about being under oath and criminal perjury really brings out the truth in people, even treasonous liberals.  

Even so, in service to a treasonous coup, the FBI did it anyway, an act then clearly and indisputably sanctioned by the Conspirator In Chief: Barrack Obama. A historic conspiracy that was nonetheless left uninvestigated and unreported by the entire national news media, for now seven years. 

So. It’s settled, then. The entire establishment—the Democrat Party, the Obama administration, the deep state, the news media—conspired to commit treason against the United States and the America people. Of course, we can hear liberal voters howling: But, but, nobody’s been convicted or went to prison! Okay but, does that make these revelations any less true? The liberal faithful like to hang their hat on the no time-no crime idea, as if that somehow nullifies the treasonous plot and exonerates their political deities. Well, what about these under oath and investigative revelations? What about the campaign finance violations and fines?  

Ask the FEC why they fined Clinton and the DNC. They’d say, Well, in paying for the dossier, Mrs. Clinton and the Committee misused campaign funds [In fact, the FEC did say it, via the fine].  

You: So they paid for this ‘Steele Dossier,’ then, which was fake. “
FEC: Well, yes. At least they paid for it. We aren’t concerned with matters of authenticity, only spending violations. 

And if Clinton paid for it, then it renders the whole Russian collusion matter a fraud, a political calumny. The fact all the conspirators knew it was a fraud renders it a treasonous conspiracy. Albeit a conspiracy with no convictions or prison time. And to the fact there hasn’t been any punishment:  

Might that speak to the deep establishment corruption of which Donald Trump speaks?  
Might that be because the establishment is a corrupt criminal enterprise?  
A treasonous coup doesn’t demonstrate and authenticate crime and corruption?  

So, again: it’s settled—the irritating ululation of liberal voters notwithstanding. The entire establishment conspired to commit treason against the United States and the America people. This now firmly established, here’s the question: 

Do you really think treasonous conspirators care who runs for the 2024 GOP nomination?  

In other words, if traitors attempt a treasonous coup to arrest power and render the citizenry communist slaves, and then fail, and then use their establishment allies, federal agencies, and ultimate power to evade punishment for seven years, and thus far survive, virtually intact, and are thus emboldened, and poised to perhaps try it again, to this time perhaps succeed, never to be punished ever again, and to succeed in their communist dream.  

Do you really think an opposition’s candidate would matter to such people?  

What matters to traitors, a crime punishable by death, incidentally, is not getting caught. So Job Number One, obviously, is keeping your crime concealed, which the traitors have thus far done, at least to the extent they haven’t been criminally indicted, thanks to their establishment network of conspirators and ideologues.    

Now. Next question: regarding the opposition, who is the one GOP primary candidate who intimately knows what the traitors did, and can prove it? Which candidate has seen the evidence, documented the evidence [Mar-a-Lago raid anyone?], and whose functionaries helped prove the traitor’s crimes?  Furthermore, which candidate is the only candidate railing about establishment corruption, about putting an end to both the corruption and establishment reign, and about returning rightful, constitutional authority to the American citizenry? 

Donald Trump, of course. And isn’t this—establishment corruption and specifically treason—the only issue that matters? 

We’re talking about traitors, here. Traitors who are not only legally pursuing and indicting Donald Trump, but who must pursue and indict. Why?

For their crime, of course.

They’re Marxist traitors and treasonous coup conspirators. So, yes. They actually do care which GOP primary candidate runs for the GOP nomination, at least where it concerns Trump. 

The obsessive litigious shoes don’t match the dress? 

So then, what is this farce that is the GOP primary? Why are the candidates moving forward as if a treasonous coup never took place? It plays right into the establishment’s hands. In fact, the treasonous conspirators love this concept. There are all the primary candidates, talking about all the problems they’ll solve when “they become president.” It’s politics as usual—just what a treasonous establishment would want.  

No need to look back on a treasonous plot, folks. If we were guilty, then we would’ve been punished. Just ask our voters.  

Or as Barrack Obama put it: “Forward!” A term of conviction, interestingly, that European Marxists and radicals applied to their own respective movements, also aimed at moving past capitalism and—“Forward!”—into socialism and communism. And it’s really just communism, socialism the purgatory before the gulags and gas chambers. 

The GOP primary candidates are on stage talking about political stuff, a return to “fiscal responsibility” and “common sense governance.” Meanwhile, the traitors are busy burying the one threat to their power in manufactured and limitless litigation, an issue GOP primary candidates are clearly loath to discuss.  

We need to move past Trump.  
We can’t win with Trump. 
We need freshness in the Oval Office.  
Trump’s buried in litigation! 

Well, what is that litigation all about? Who’s burying Trump in it, exactly? And why? 

All these republican candidates know what, who, and why. But they also know their desires and ambitions, and what it requires to serve those desires and ambitions. And a disservice to those desires and ambitions is acknowledging a treasonous coup took place and, on behalf of the American people, fighting the Marxist establishment that executed it. 

There is one candidate acknowledging and fighting. Thus far he has refused to share the primary stage with America’s Marxist enemies. 

That’s the power of calling out your enemy and exposing his sins: if forces everyone into a choice, into choosing a side and exposing themselves. Including republican primary candidates, who’ve turned out to be just more establishment myrmidons. Trump the competition, they’d rather defeat him, than defend the American people from a communist coup. 

Side chosen. Loyalty revealed. 

It’s like looking at a tiny, pin-prick island on a world map, say, like, the Solomon Island’s Guadalcanal. Then approaching that island by boat to realize its comparative immensity and vastness. Likewise, the establishment is more expansive than people might suspect. More than just democrats, it’s a sea of self-serving people who want to maintain the political arrangement and eliminate any threat to the profitable status quo. 

Something they do by burying the threat in manufactured litigation and pretending treason is not the elephant in the room during a presidential primary. 

©JMW 8/2023 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs Latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside. 

After Russian collusion was exposed as, essentially, a treasonous Obama administration plot, everything that followed in the get Trump saga—perpetual scandals, two impeachment attempts, a stolen 2020 election via a bioweapon and massive voter fraud, a January 6 insurrection scam, an unprecedented DOJ/FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago, countless post-presidency indictments and lawsuits—should have sent a crystal-clear message:  

Donald Trump cannot survive. 

As a friend recently put it: “Even the most disconnected, apolitical person should be able to notice the weird, pathological obsession.” 

You’d be surprised, I said. 

Even so, it is abundantly clear: destroying Trump is imperative. There can be no other outcome. What did he do to deserve such pathological preoccupation?  Well, let’s first address the things he didn’t do, which are represented by seven years’ worth of fake, manufactured scandals and crimes that were all disproven and fell flat. As for what he did do, as to the crime that made his demise imperative, the sin is singular: 

He proclaimed America’s political establishment “failed and corrupt,” and said he was going to replace it “with a new government controlled by you, the American people”— 

but wait, isn’t that how it was meant to be in America? The original design? 

Given the establishment’s reaction, its continuing seven-year legal assault and its abundantly obvious goal—Trump’s destruction. His accusation clearly and inarguably has merit. His sin was publicly indicting the establishment and challenging its/their domain and rule, and for seven-years now, members all—the Democrat Party, the GOP, the FBI and CIA, the deep state, the news media—have been seeking his demise. And despite falling flat on their faces with every single attempt, they, unfazed and undaunted, keep trying.  

What would inspire such establishment zeal? Such odd political alliances and unity?  

Exposing their rigged and corrupt system and putting an end to it, perhaps?  
Restoring constitutional law and order and returning political control to the American people?  

A seven-year assault yet at full-throttle, the establishment clearly loathes both of those ideas.  

Why? 

Well, maybe because they’re corrupt, and because they really, really like the beneficial system they’ve arranged for themselves.  

I’m spit-balling here, but it makes sense.  

Establishment democrats and republicans can’t unify on anything else. Yet challenge their power and control, their domain and rule, and their interests suddenly align. Suddenly there is agreement of purpose and kinship, which they don’t publicize, but that’s nonetheless obvious in their shared goal: Trump’s destruction. Liberals say directly, Trump is a criminal unfit for office! While GOPer’s like Paul Ryan are more indirect: “Republicans can’t win with Trump.”

A softer, less compromising approach, but the same objective, nonetheless. 

It has been said countless times, but perhaps it’s time to start living by it: don’t listen to what people say; watch what they do. Behavior never lies. Via behavior, people tell you what is in their heart, tell you what they believe and, to the point, their objectives and goals. Electing Trump, the American people overwhelmingly loved and agreed with him in 2016, and with 11 million more votes in 2020, loved and agreed even more. The establishment, on the other hand, did not agree, and for seven-years now have made the American people pay for their disagreeable selection.  

Why? 

Because they can! Because it’s their domain and rule, not the people’s. 

Via their power and control, the establishment manufactured seven-years’ worth of legal fraud to destroy Trump. Seven years’ worth—and the fraud factory is still up and running and the fraud ongoing. Now that is determination. Dedication invariably summoned for but one reason: abject fear.  

Absolute terror of losing their domain, power, control, and rule. 

Enduring their attacks and undeterred, Trump is equally determined to end their establishment reign, their rule of deceit and abuses at the expense of their rightful lords and paymasters, the American people. Hence, Trump cannot win reelection—cannot be allowed to run, even, and have the opportunity. If the citizenry understood the gravity of this conflict, they would be more concerned and engaged. Instead, they view it as normal, eye-rollable politics. When it is anything but normal politics. It’s wholly abnormal, in fact, which should be obvious when an entire political establishment undertakes a seven-year effort to destroy a singular politician and prevent him from exposing its treasonous crimes.  

For challenging the establishment’s domain and rule, not only can Trump not occupy the White House. He must be destroyed, utterly—not only to save and ensure the established order, but to send a message to all others who’d dare challenge its/their authority. 

This unrelenting and bankrupting legal assault is what awaits you, too, slick! 

The bottom line in all this is dark and ugly: the establishment is not only deeply corrupt, but treasonous. Members betrayed the United States and have been both caught in their treasonous crimes and, specifically the GOP, exposed for their establishment loyalty. Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and every other establishment-loyal republican knows full well what the establishment has done to Trump, and fully understand the involved corruption, too. And they nevertheless chose a side— 

the establishment side.  

Trump represents a choice: the establishment or the United States Constitution? Or rather, establishment domain and rule, or constitutional servitude, as designed and intended? Some members want to avoid accountability for their treasonous crimes, obviously, but none want to surrender the power and control they’ve arranged for themselves, or the subsequent security and fruits, either. Members can accumulate vast personal wealth. They are societal celebrities, inexplicably cheered and lauded. Controlling law enforcement, intelligence, the judiciary, the news media—they can do whatever they want and either conceal their crimes or, if necessary, avoid punishment.  

Establishment members fancy themselves rulers, not servants of the people. And like all the rest of history’s despots, they aim to keep it that way.  

Hence, Trump must be destroyed. Utterly.  

He cannot survive because he’s threatening the establishment’s domain and rule, which is more than just a beneficial arrangement, incidentally. It’s HQ for a communist takeover of the United States—and not a planned communist takeover, either, but one ongoing. Liberals don’t plan on subjecting themselves to the peasantry’s complaints and unhappiness forever. The goal is to arrange things so the peasantry’s complaints and unhappiness don’t matter; so elections don’t matter; so campaign lying and all those bus tours to stinking, backwater states and towns are unnecessary.  

The Marxist objective well on its way to fulfillment, Donald Trump cannot then survive. If he survives and wins reelection, he will once again stop the establishment’s destruction of America, devastation necessary to usher in communism, and to permanently shutter the complaint and unhappiness departments. He will restore the historic prosperity, security, and success of his first term and, most injurious, will yet again demonstrate the ineptitude, corruption, and undeniable Marxist evil of America’s establishment complex. 

And that … is a problem. 

All roads lead to Russian collusion. Basically, the establishment plotted against the American people and were caught, were exposed. Thus, every step of the last seven years, every get Trump-themed political contrivance and subsequent road to nowhere, has been a strategic and desperate effort to conceal their treasonous Russian collusion crime, and to hold on to their domain and rule. 

Command and control that’s in grave danger as long as Trump hangs around. 

Trump cannot hang around, which is no less obvious. Hence the question: in a functioning republic where freedom, liberty, and the citizenry reign, why not? Why can’t a political challenger exist, and be met fairly in the arena of ideas? Whom does a functioning republic and Trump threaten exactly? 

The answer presents these suggestions, ideas not to be met fairly in the arena of ideas, either: perhaps the republic isn’t functioning. Perhaps the established rulers refuse to tolerate such insolence and disobedience from any and every political challenger.  

And furthermore, perhaps Trump demonstrates it. 

©JMW 7/2023 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

Is the Special Counsel a corrupt establishment conspirator? In view of John Durham’s long-awaited report on the Russian collusion plot, this is an apparent question that now, unfortunately, requires an answer. 

Media pundits keep telling us that these federal litigators assigned to these significant cases are apolitical and bipartisan people brimming with dependable character and integrity, and thus totally trustworthy. Yet time and again proven criminals escape prosecution and punishment—at least, certain proven criminals, criminals of a certain distinction. 

Establishment members never get punished. Pick your historic crime: a treasonous Russian collusion plot, Hunter and Joe Biden’s laptop crimes, election fraud. Crime after criminal and ethical and immoral crime, the result for liberal members is the same: no punishment. 

So, quick question: when political leaders can commit crimes and control their own justice, what do they call that? Tyranny? Communism?   

Pretty sure those are the terms. 

Regarding Durham and his investigation, let’s understand precisely what took place … 

Russiagate—the term for the establishment’s treasonous Russian collusion coup—was a political operation launched by Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC (Democrat National Committee). Or basically, Clinton and the Democrat Party. Criminally, they used campaign money to buy a fictional story about Donald Trump from FBI informant and former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, which they then put into a document, the Steele Dossier, and took to the FBI.  

Knowing the information therein was a manufactured and false Clinton product, the FBI still and then took that document and launched a full-scale investigation into Donald Trump anyway. Looking to expand their investigation and its capacities—surveillance, the FBI then took the fictional information to the FISA (Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court) court.  

Once in court, the FBI claimed it had extensive information that Donald Trump was a Russian asset, a spy for the Russians—information the FBI, again, knew was manufactured and false. Therein, the FBI lied to the FISA court and judge—about the information, the facts, and their biases. Most importantly, the agency did not provide the court the evidence of the target’s [Trump’s] innocence in their investigation [evidence they had, and a fact they knew for their case being a manufactured fraud and coup attempt], a fundamental requirement in the judicial warrant process.  

So basically, the FBI knowingly lied to a federal court to achieve their objective, which was to surveil a political candidate they did not like, who they no less knew was being targeted by his political opponent, Clinton, whom they obviously preferred.  

And, they succeeded.  

Clinton got the ball rolling with the paid for fiction and, after she lost the 2016 election, the FBI took over and kept the conspiracy ball rolling. A contrived, predicateless venture otherwise known as: a conspiratorial coup. 

In sum, if there was no predicate for the Trump/Russian collusion investigation, no reason to open it, for the investigation to ever begin, or for the surveillance warrant to be issued. Then everything that happened afterward—the Mueller investigation, the trials of Trump cabinet members, the advocating news stories, the years-long taunting by gullible and annoying liberal voters—shouldn’t have happened either. 

Per his report, Durham verified this lack of predicate, and in fact laid out the above summary in exhaustive and excruciating detail. But the lack of predicate wasn’t the point he was making. He was saying something else. The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution: 

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” [emphasis added] 

In other words, “no [FISA] warrants shall issue” without a predicate. 

Durham was saying the coup conspirators broke the law. They had no cause to surveil Trump, and they knew it [executing a treasonous coup, of course they knew it!]. Yet they did it anyway, with a manufactured fiction they knew to be invented. A dreamed-up, paid for tale that they put in an official document to destroy a political opponent and steal an election.  

Okay, so. The crime incontrovertible, where are the arrests, indictments, and prosecutions? Which should be a rather long, scroll-like list of individuals.  

Clinton was definitely a conspirator. Barrack Obama was, too, and his entire administration, from White House advisers to members of the FBI, intelligence community, and Department of Justice (DOJ). So was Christopher Steele, along with Glenn Simpson and his entire Fusion GPS staff. There were Democrat Party members, Adam Schiff for one, and a slew of others. Members of the news media were involved, too, and not just reporting contrived and fake news stories, but actively participating in the coup itself.  

The coup never stood a chance of success without the news media’s involvement.  

Know that. Never forget it. 

There are a lot of agency and company labels here, but within are countless individuals, conspirators, who perpetuated this now undeniable crime—multiple crimes, actually. Hence, this is clearly much worse than a mere “no predicate” issue and negligent police work.  

Clearly, it’s a criminal conspiracy. Indeed, a historic crime of treason.  

When you have no probable cause, no “predicate,’ you violate the Fourth Amendment. When a group of public officials has no predicate, and know they have no predicate, because they know the information they are using is manufactured and false. Then it’s a conspiracy—a conspiracy to defraud voters, to subvert an election, and to ultimately commit treason.  

So again, a major and historic crime clearly and unquestionably committed, where are Durham’s arrests, indictments, and prosecutions? His final report and investigatory task now complete, we know there won’t be any further indictments or prosecutions or punishment by Durham. As former FBI Director, James Comey, did for Clinton and her classified document crimes, Durham laid out the conspirator’s crimes in his report, and has effectively exonerated the conspirators, too. 

Well, Durham did try a couple of cases in court and lost, you say. True. But, how hard did he really try? We know what really trying, what being extremely determined to destroy your target looks like. It’s an establishment and deep state trying to pull off a treasonous plot both to steal an election and destroy a president they don’t like.  

Now that’s trying!  

Did Durham try this hard? Was he as vehemently committed to success? Or is he yet another establishment conspirator tasked with playing his role and making sure the establishment prevails and survives? He makes clear in his report that a major and historic crime took place involving a scroll-like list of conspirators. Yet there are no further indictments, prosecutions, or potential punishment?  

Pardon the profanity, but, how the f- can that possibly be?! 

Ask Comey: how can you lay out all these crimes committed by the target of your investigation, and then say “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case” against the target? People stand around glancing at one another confused, How can he itemize all these crimes and not prosecute? As if they’ve missed some key detail or haven’t the legal acumen to understand. But they haven’t missed anything. There simply won’t be any prosecution because Comey, a collusion conspirator, didn’t want there to be a prosecution of Hillary Clinton, not only his fellow conspirator, but the Russian collusion architect. 

Likewise, here’s Durham laying out in his report the crimes of these establishment conspirators, the very same conspirators Comey protected, incidentally, and he isn’t bringing any more cases, either. Conclusion? 

Let’s just say one and one makes two. 

Durham did indeed bring a couple of cases—Michael Sussmann and Igor Danchenko—to trial. The liberal juries in DC and Virginia nullified the overwhelming evidence against both men, which means both could’ve confessed their crimes and the juries wouldn’t have convicted them merely for the convictions validating Trump and his “witch hunt” claims.

In fact, upon conclusion of the Sussmann trial, the jury foreperson said, “Personally, I don’t think [the case] should have been prosecuted because I think we have better time or resources to use or spend to other things that affect the nation as a whole than a possible lie to the FBI. We could spend that time more wisely. The government had the job of proving beyond a reasonable doubt. We broke it down…as a jury. It didn’t pan out in the government’s favor.” 

Rather, it didn’t pan out in Trump’s favor.  

As for the foreperson’s “time and resources” complaint, incidentally, what could the nation do with $40 million dollars spent on a fraud that Sussmann and his collusion conspirators, namely Robert Mueller, perpetrated at taxpayer expense? Did that “affect the nation as a whole?” How about election fraud and disenfranchising American voters? That have national implications? 

Better still, Ms. Liberal Jury Foreperson, does any of that change your opinion about Trump? That he was the actual victim of a manufactured state crime and not a Russian asset? No? Not even a little? 

Oh boy. She gave us the finger. Typical. 

Yes, Durham failed twice in court. So, what? Did he become demoralized, forlorn, and throw-in the litigious towel? Or did he take the occasion to wrap up the investigation for himself and the rest of his fellow establishment conspirators? 

Durham did manage one conviction in the case: FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, which was a conviction Durham couldn’t avoid, actually, for Clinesmith being so reckless and foolish. Nevertheless, it’s a litigious success that presents an interesting, and perhaps, condemning, query.  

A convicted collusion conspirator, Clinesmith altered a document and intentionally lied to a federal court, just so the FBI and DOJ could secure probable cause and get the warrant, which “shall not be issued but upon probable cause,” to spy on Trump. Clinesmith agreed to plead guilty, because, well, there’s the clearly altered document, and he was caught. So, as part of the plea deal, why didn’t Durham bind Clinesmith’s cooperation to the plea agreement thereafter? Or more simply, as a condition of Clinesmith’s plea, why didn’t Durham force him to cooperate? 

Durham states in his own report that Clinesmith declined to participate.  

Declined to participate? What is this fresh nonsense?!  

Was anyone allowed to decline participation in Mueller’s phony Russian collusion investigation?  

No.  

Who told Clinesmith to alter the document?  
Were his superiors involved?  
Did someone sign-off on his lie?  

But a few important questions we have no answer to because Clinesmith “declined” to participate, and Durham allowed it. 

And, it gets worse … 

Durham allowed the architects—FBI Director James Comey, Peter Strozk, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and others—of the biggest, most fraudulent conspiracy in FBI/DOJ history to effectively decline participation, too. Strikingly, or perhaps, condemningly, none of them were brought under subpoena and compelled to testify, either.  

So, let’s be clear: the two people responsible for our law enforcement community, James Comey and Andrew McCabe, launched a fraudulent investigation, knowingly lied to a federal court to enhance that fraudulent investigation, leaked about it to the media, allowed it to continue for over a year. And John Durham never spoke to them? 

Durham’s task boiled down to one question: did the FBI have a predicate, have probable cause, to open the Crossfire Hurricane case and spy on Trump? His conclusion was a resounding no, which then compels a crime, and participants in that crime. And Durham allows them to decline participation and doesn’t speak to them. 

Why? Why would such fundamental aspects of prosecutorial procedure be neglected and allowed?  

Durham is a 30-plus-year federal prosecutor, was the US Attorney for the District of Connecticut and ran an entire federal prosecutor’s office. He served multiple jurisdictions in administrations, both republican and democrat. So, as former federal prosecutor himself, Kash Patel, said, “There is no way he doesn’t know how to use the grand jury process and subpoena individuals.” 

So then, Durham allowed these criminals walk. Let them walk even knowing, per his report, they were guilty. Thus, Durham is one of two things in this scenario: a prosecutor, if inept and failed, or an establishment conspirator. And prosecutors, determined prosecutors, apolitical and unbiased prosecutors, prosecutors brimming with dependable character and integrity, and totally trustworthy, do not fail to compel cooperation and allow criminals to go unpunished. 

Juries might allow it, which signals genuine national peril, incidentally. But not committed, competent, honest prosecutors of unquestionable character and integrity. 

During his testimony to congress, Durham found it “sobering” that the FBI didn’t interview its sources for its Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Yet here he is having done the very same thing. When your goals are honesty, fairness, and integrity, and to protect the accused and the accused’s rights and reputation, you do the work to make sure the accusations are true and that your resulting charges are warranted.  

Even the mundane and unnecessary tasks, like, you know, speaking to the accusers.  

The establishment swamp is a deeply corrupt and fetid place, a degree of which the American people had no idea. Donald Trump exposed not only that the swamp exists, but that it is made up of both Republicans and Democrats. Self-serving dwellers who want the political arrangement to remain the same, where they get to play their political games at quite literally the public’s expense. Where they get to hand out other people’s money and receive all the accolades of charitable compassion, and get to enjoy notoriety and celebrity and status, and the financial fruits thereof.  

The American people had no idea of the depth of the corruption, which has taken seven years to but partially expose. The opened sore continues to ooze, however, continues to reveal secrets and data as to how deep the corruption runs. For the continuing revelations, establishment figures, both republican and democrat, have been forced to publicly choose sides, if only by behavior and in deed. Trump remaining relative has made every swamp dweller publicize both their identity and loyalty, specifically establishment republicans. They talk about the rule of law and the national debt, and about everything and anything but the confirmed fact Donald Trump—and America—has been a victim of a treasonous plot, and that Joe Biden and his establishment conspirators are being protected by the establishment, which obviously includes these establishment-loyal republicans.  

As obscenely corrupt and disturbing as that is, the question is, does the establishment’s corruption reach the Special Prosecutor’s office and include John Durham?  Because, it appears it does.

Or, perhaps there is another answer … 

Former US Attorney, Brett Tolman: 

“I had my fair share of run-ins with main justice [DOJ]. John Durham is a good man. He’s hard working, but I believe absolutely that [he] was hamstrung by the Department of Justice; I think, at every angle that he probably wanted to pursue. [Selecting him] was both the optic of appointing a special counsel that provided some semblance of hope to the right, but it was also the trap the DOJ could use to confine the nature of the investigation and the aggression of the investigation.  

“Think about when the DOJ wants to be aggressive. We see them be aggressive when they want to, when it’s classified documents in the possession of a former president [Trump], they can be very, very aggressive. If it’s Hunter Biden, they can delay. If it’s special counsel John Durham … And I don’t believe that it was the investigation that [Durham] truly wanted to run. I think what you saw was an investigation that was outlined for him, that this was the way it was going to go down in the department.” 

Of course, Durham had the ability to fight back, the ability to say, No, this is my investigation and I’m here to find the truth wherever it leads. The DOJ certainly sanctioned the ability of other investigations to expand their focus, namely the Mueller investigation. If the DOJ was putting roadblocks in Durham’s way to hamstring his investigation and conceal the truth—their establishment crimes, Durham could have overcome them.   

Tolman again: “I don’t want to excuse John Durham for failings that may have been the result of his decision making. Because he certainly could have pressed the envelope, been more public. But it’s not his demeanor to do so, and I think [the DOJ conspirators] knew that when they put him in that position. You needed someone that was going to be willing to butt their head up against the executive levels of DOJ and say, No, I am going to issue a subpoena to Jim Comey. I am going to subpoena Hillary Clinton. I’m going to subpoena [Andrew] McCabe and [Peter] Strozk. And if they want to take the 5^th [Amendment], I’m going to make them do it on the record, and then I’m going to decide which ones I’ll give immunity to, and leverage, so that I can get them to talk. And they’ll be under oath. And if they don’t cooperate, we’ll go after them for obstruction. [The investigation] needed to have somebody that had that aggression, but [the DOJ conspirators] knew that they didn’t have that in John Durham.” 

So then, was John Durham a willing conspirator, or merely temperamentally weak and controllable?   

Either way, the establishment conspirators all got what they wanted: no punishment. 

The math is interesting: virtually everyone in Washington, the news media, and the entertainment industry despises Trump, to include former Attorney General William Barr, who appointed Durham to investigate crimes against Trump, and current AG, Merrick Garland, who unprecedentedly raided Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home for classified documents, and indicted him for related crimes. Durham just testified to congress that the entire Russian collusion matter was a treasonous plot involving all these establishment figures and agencies. And all are not only ignoring the revelation, but still angling to destroy the plot’s target and victim: Donald Trump. 

As recent years keep repeatedly revealing, the question about any and every establishment figure is not: are they corrupt? But are they not corrupt? Unfortunately, none can be afforded the benefit of presumed honesty and righteousness and innocence anymore. Henceforth, the assumption must be: they’re dirty, until they prove themselves otherwise. 

In his testimony to congress, Durham said his findings are “serious” and “deserve attention from the American public and its representatives.” “We found troubling violations of law and policy in the conduct of highly consequential investigations directed at members of a presidential campaign and ultimately, a presidential administration [the Trump administration]. To me,” he said, “it matters not whether it was a Republican campaign or a Democrat campaign. The law ought to apply to everybody in the same way.”  

Well, Durham had the equal justice ball in his hands, and an opportunity to do just that. So, why didn’t he?  

A weak and controllable temperament seems awfully convenient … to me.  

The unfortunate suspicion is Durham’s fault, purely a consequence of not having the cojones to do what was clearly and unmistakably right—if, indeed, that concept was ever a consideration in the first place. 

©JMW 6/2023 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs Latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

One doesn’t take the fight to elitist liberals, no-no-no. Do it, and they will come after you. Taking the fight to liberals and refusing to yield is why Donald Trump continues to be a source of irritation. Actually, when you have tried everything to get rid of him but assassination, it’s a little more than irritation. It’s indignant fury. 

Even worse, when you publicly demonstrate the nonsense of liberal arguments, and their intellectual incompetence by extension. Well, that makes them even more indignant and furious. Liberals not only loathe being exposed and humiliated. They deeply despise those who do it. Because in their minds they are the smartest human beings, their views irreproachable and incontestable.

And any demonstrations to the contrary … well, those simply won’t be tolerated.  

Hence the name calling—racist, homophobe, xenophobe—that comes so easily. If the opposition is racist or whatever, then their humiliating and crushing demonstrations are invalid and ignorable. Racists have no standing, are to be neither heard nor believed.  

The opposition’s ideas naive and contemptible, which actually means: accurate and humiliating, liberals not only don’t want to hear the ideas. They don’t want others to hear them, either. They don’t want others hearing the embarrassing rebuttals to their ridiculous arguments and positions, and watching both them and their ideas being made laughing stocks. Such condemning displays are, again, more than elitist liberals can stand. They despise them, like Meredith Johnson despised Tom Sanders. 

“Meredith, could you step outside for a minute, please?” Bye-bye … 

She’s the quintessential liberal—haughty, entitled, condescending. 

Liberals argue with this ridiculous and unfounded sense of superior arrogance, and then the simplest ideas and wisdom destroy both them and their ideas. Like an acquaintance who proclaimed the unvaccinated were lone spreaders of the covid virus, for example, and that the vaccinated were safe from the illness.  

Well, they were wrong.  

But then, what do you expect? They are liberal.  

Proudly liberal, obviously. Too proud. And like, haughty, entitled, and condescending.  

Is saying “I was wrong” really so difficult? Or even, “I was misled.” 

Yes. It is.

Such failures confirm the impossible, the unthinkable: inferiority and subordination. Thus, such blunders are reviled by liberals—not so much the blunders, actually, but the public exposure of the blunders. And for Trump continually and unyieldingly jabbing them in the mouth over their blunders, liberals, like Clubber Lang, have been thrown into this state of indignant fury. Aware and afraid more and more people are recognizing their utter pathetitude, they’re fighting back. And it looks unhinged—the mindless anger, resentful glares, and Meredith-style outrage: “The drives were your responsibility, not mine!” 

Zero self-awareness. Zero self-control. The Malaysian news reel, Meredith? the line you’ve never seen?

Meredith? 

We’ve lost her, I’m afraid.

Smarter than other human beings, liberals are more qualified. Thus, there is no way simpletons, the opposition, could have better ideas and arguments than them. Because, well, that’s just absurd. And pathetic though it is, there is a class of voter, liberal voters, who like to align with this superiorist mentality.

Because, for the low-low price of intellectual servitude, they can feel elite, too!   

The anointed, liberals don’t care what simpletons think, and don’t care to hear what they think, either. And the more simpleton ideas and wisdom expose them, expose their ineptitude and inferiority, the more furious and out of control they become. Add the fact liberal leadership has been caught lying and cheating, and shown to be nothing more than common, inept criminals. It has turned the entire liberal cult into berserk rats in searing bucket. 

This is the phase, enraged madness, we are currently in with liberals, particularly the elite. In mindless, arrogant fury they think: Donald Trump will not go away! And he keeps thwarting and exposing and embarrassing us, and making us look ridiculous! And no matter what fraud we attempt, we can’t separate his voters from him! And every time I’m on Facebook, there are all these videos and memes making me look inferior and foolish. And everyone can see them! 

It’s infuriating, which is partly why liberals can’t conceptualize the reason for their embarrassment and rage:  

It’s them! They’re the reason! Them and their third-rate, ever-failing ideas and solutions!  

You can’t make humiliating social media videos and memes with winning and successful ideas and solutions. Well, you can. But you must lie and commit fraud. But then, the videos and memes aren’t truly humiliating because, well, they’re lies! Made-up fictions! Yet liberals sit around in their cliques and laugh at them, hehehe! Pass them around to each other on social media, hehehe! Why the petty fraud and unsettling delusion?   

Because their ideas are terrible! Subpar and ever-failing!

Because their ideas provide a constant stream of humiliating video and meme material, which demand rebuttal—even if it means lying and inventing one. This humiliation shall not stand! 

Imagine it: being so pathetic that you invent lies, pass them around as if they’re true, and collectively laugh at your own lies.  

It’s cuckoo. Bellevue-grade cuckoo. 

All liberals know is, they are the anointed; they are the premiere intellectuals and solutions people. Because, despite their ever-failing ideas, which they see fail, no less, that’s what liberals have told themselves, over and over and over. It’s what they’ve had to tell themselves, mantra-style:  

Our ideas are better … Our ideas are better … Our ideas are better … Ohmmmmm …
We’re superior … We’re superior … We’re superior … Ohmmmmm … 

Thoroughly convinced, or rather, self-deluded, liberals aren’t then interested in “reaching across the aisle” and solving problems, because the aisle is only thing keeping their delusion alive. And besides, what could simpletons bring to a discussion anyway? Certainly nothing superior.  

Except, it’s their ideas that are always failing, and that wind up video and meme mockery. It’s their ideas being bettered and battered by the simpleton’s ideas, and their superiority being proven mythical. The response to this humiliating and recurring outcome?  

No more talking! On Twitter, Facebook, talk radio, Fox News. Anywhere! 

Our ideas might be inferior, but damned if people will know it! You’re all cancelled! 

Remind me again why anyone would elect and tolerate such petulant blowhards?  

What Americans have learned post-Trump is that our establishment elite, specifically the liberal faction, are not only frauds, but narcissistic weirdos. Crichton wrote of his experience with Hollywood, liberal headquarters, and how it was filled with “homosexuals and theatrical people, and people who were into drugs and orgies and odd things of all sorts,” and into “all this looney stuff, psychics and astrology and peculiar diets.” And given his film oeuvre, Crichton would know. These are things people didn’t know about America’s cultural elite, how weird and corrupt they were and, worse, that they were admiring and pedestalizing such immoral weirdos.  

Well, Trump forced the weirdos not just to coalesce, but to expose themselves to the American public. Enraged, they erupted from their seedy lairs everywhere, proclaiming to the world they would “f*** anybody up” who opposes drag queens, for example; confessing fiercely and proudly that all their children were queer; and championing drag queen performances for everyone else’s children, to perhaps persuade them to be queer, too. Drag performances by grown men, incidentally, who psychiatry has maintained for the last 50 years receive sexual gratification dressing like women. What shall we do with that little factoid?  

Well, while you’re assessing, liberals are having 50 years of research revised and scrubbed from psychiatry manuals. No more talking!  

So, do you think this stuff is “evil?”  
Think it a “good” thing not to sexualize innocent children?

Yes?  

Well, liberals disagree.  

So then, what kind of war is this? A political war? Or the oldest war, the human experiences’ foundational war? 

An incontrovertible war of good and evil, we can then forgo the politics—which is precisely where liberals would love to keep this and every other ideological dispute, because it keeps them political adversaries instead of disciples and practitioners of evil—and focus on the real war and the real enemy: evil and its disciples. 

Good and evil: two things that cannot and will not coexist in the same space. One must be driven out so the other can reign.  

Per the clarification, we can then reframe the point: Trump forced, not just weirdos, but evil to coalesce and to expose itself to the American public. More directly, he forced evil’s disciples, liberals, to expose themselves. Trump compelled action, action to protect the institution—the institution of evil. Like Christ to Legion, Trump was the presence that urged evil from its lair, only in this case threatened and outraged and venomous, instead of worshipful and afraid. Hence, the now seven-year battle began, and American found itself at war with evil once more—homegrown and liberal this time.  

Evil has not only found its way into the homeland. It has taken over the culture’s major institutions—specifically and most alarmingly the media, the public microphone, with which evil can deceive and influence and manipulate. Evil has pitted itself against all things moral, decent, righteous, and Godly, terms that used to define America, and has endeavored to corrupt America to its core. So that people not only become more accepting of evil, but of evil’s rule.  

And very simply, the American people must now choose sides. 

Evil people think they are righteous, not evil. Because to them evil is righteous. Sociopaths, they don’t care that people are opposed to the sexualization of children, no more than they care about children being sexualized. “No, you’re right. It’s vital we protect the children.” Are we hearing liberals saying that?

No. Because they don’t care. They exploit children, and everyone else.

Evil people have no moral compass because they oppose morals—and rules, and discipline. And via its disciples—liberals, evil is attempting to transform a righteous nation into an evil one, into one representative of itself.  

What people think evil looks like and what it actually is are two different things. As Clarke put it, “The devil doesn’t come to you as evil. He doesn’t come to you on fire. He comes to you as everything you’ve ever wanted.”

In other words, evil isn’t just a maniacal serial murderer with menacing eyes, neck tattoos, and a devilish goatee. It’s your next-door neighbor, your coworker, your family member—average people who profess their love for children, but then champion and allow their exploitation, and even mutilation. People who lie about others to make fake videos and memes, and sit together laughing at their own lies. People who have contempt for the truth, and for those who tell it. 

People like, liberals. 

And taking the fight to them, to evil, one can understand why things appear as they do: acrimonious, nasty, hateful. Forced to defend themselves, which elitists feel they should never have to do, liberals aren’t prepared. In their attempts they sound absurd, incoherent and silly. And if not incoherent and ridiculous, then furious and unhinged. It’s why the fight must be continually taken to them: so they can routinely demonstrate to the world not just their inferiority, but their depravity, and whom they serve. 

And it isn’t God, or righteousness, or their fellowman. 

Darkness. It’s liberal sum and substance. 

©JMW 5/2023 
All Rights Reserved

JMWs Latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside. 

Regarding Donald Trump’s recent New York indictment, El Salvador president, Nayib Bukele’s, remarks are dark and ominous:  

“Imagine if this happened in any other country, where a government arrested the main opposition candidate. The United States’ ability to use ‘democracy’ as foreign policy is gone.”  

In other words, electricity to the “shining city on a hill” has been cut off at the main.   

Trump wasn’t arrested for an egregious crime, either. Like, say, a treasonous Russian collusion plot to overthrow a leading and longstanding democracy. He was indicted for paying a porn star to stop extorting him. A Non-Disclosure (NDA) Agreement that, somehow, broke federal campaign finance law. The same campaign finance laws that Hillary Clinton and the Democrat National Committee violated, misreporting money paid for a fake dossier used in a treasonous Russian collusion plot to overthrow a leading and longstanding democracy. Gee, that sounds familiar. 

Anyway, what happened to them?  

They wrote a $113,000 dollar check to the Federal Election Committee to square accounts—a fine quietly imposed and check quietly written, of course, to avoid those nasty optics. Say like, a double standard of justice and political corruption. 

So, let’s review: same crime, a criminal indictment for one, a quietly imposed fine for the other. 

A result otherwise known as: the nasty optics. 

It’s surely my overactive logical tendencies, but there seems an imbalance here, an inequality—the type liberals are always going on and on about. It seems there are two systems of justice being employed instead of the singular blind justice for one and all. It seems like, dare I say it?  

Well, like tyranny. 

What else would you call a government allowing loyalists to commit crimes and avoid punishment, but prosecuting political opponents to the letter of the law—the very same law the government ignores on behalf of its loyalists?  

There is no framed PhD on my wall, but it sounds rather tyrannical to me. In fact, definitively tyrannical. 

So then, why aren’t we calling Trump’s ridiculous indictment tyrannical? If what has happened to Trump the last seven years had been done to democrats, you can bet every liberal would be calling it tyranny. Democrat leaders would be draped in Gadsden Flags, singing the national anthem on capital steps, touting the ever-profound wisdom of the Founding Fathers, and arming the public with guns they professedly detest [yes, that’s how weird it would be!]. The establishment news media would be doing its job, too, rooting out the traitors, their lies, the documentation, text messages, laptop data [isn’t it interesting how the media employ themselves this rigorously for manufactured Trump scandals and crimes?]. The United Nations would even be on site, demanding a return to “sacred democracy” and that the traitors one and all be hanged.  

For God’s sake, man. If you can’t see this is tyranny, you ain’t black! C’mon, man!  

Obviously, tyranny has more than just taken root in America. It has fully blossomed, and its formidable establishment weapons are aimed squarely at Donald Trump. Of course, he isn’t the actual target. Democracy and the American people are the targets; Trump is just in the way, is the firewall. And one attack after another, an entire establishment apparatus has not just maligned him, but gone after him criminally. One attempt fails, the establishment manufactures the next criminal case, and then the next, and the next …   

For seven years Donald Trump has endured the full legal weight the federal government. Congress and nearly every federal agency has scoured his past with the best, most skilled legal professionals and investigators money can buy. No human being’s life has been more thoroughly dissected and laid bare than Donald Trump’s—his financial records, income taxes, banking statements, emails, text messages, personal life, his wife’s underwear drawer. Everything.  

In other words, every rock overturned, every nook and cranny thoroughly inspected—with high-powered headlamps and dental picks. Whatever is to be known about Trump criminally would be known. And yet, despite all this high-powered, super-determined examination, the establishment is forced to litigate an NDA agreement with a porn star. An agreement, no to incidentally, that the FEC (Federal Election Commision), the United States Attorney’s office, a former New York County District Attorney, and even the current New York County DA, Alvin Bragg, all claimed lawful and legit.  

Again, sounds rather tyrannical to me. Definitively tyrannical.  

Thus, the conclusion from all this, which should be obvious to everyone but liberal voters: (a) Donald Trump cannot survive, and for this (b) the establishment attempts to eliminate him are not going to stop. The question is why? Why the incessance and determination? Why the blind, lawless, maniacal desperation?  

Or more pointedly, why Trump? 

People think it’s because Trump called out the swamp and its widespread and politically diverse corruption publicly, and it made the swamp angry. This is partly true, and correction: it was swamp fear, not anger. It made the swamp afraid. Even so, doesn’t this scenario say something? A righteous swamp would want to either defend its virtue or root out the criminal elements and reestablish its virtue. Political corruption shall not and will not stand in the United States government! Only in this case, the swamp is angry and retaliatory. A response for which there is but one explanation: 

The swamp is corrupt, just as Trump charged.  

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump threw down the gauntlet on the liberal establishment. His “slings and arrows” speech was nuclear bomb to each member: the Democrat Party, the republican establishment, the news media, the deep state, financial institutions domestic and international. In terms direct and unambiguous, Trump let the establishment know he intended to expose their conspiratorial duplicity and corruption, and to return power back to the American people, which he did in the ensuing four years of his presidency despite a daily, unrelenting, and vicious establishment assault.  

In doing so, however, Trump unearthed and exposed something even more alarming, something clandestine and evil and never meant to be uncovered: radical Marxists in the governing class determined to destroy America via a conspiratorial network long in development. If Trump hadn’t thrown down the gauntlet and forced the establishment to address his corruption charge, voters would still think their government a political arrangement of parties and ideas, instead of what it truly is, or has become: a hotbed of communists deeply committed to transforming America into a communist plantation. 

Trump’s speech frightened the establishment, certainly, directly challenging the entirety’s power, control, and subsequent ability to accrue wealth. However, it threw these Marxist saboteurs into sheer panic. Here they were on the precipice of long awaited, thought to be impossible transformational success. Then Trump steps forward with these lethal corruption accusations and patriotic ideals, which came as no surprise to these saboteurs, incidentally. They knew the threat Trump posed long before the speech, which is why they were spying on and targeting his campaign as early as 2015, a year before the 2016 presidential election. They weren’t concerned with Jeb Bush or the rest of the 2016 republican presidential field. Else they would have targeted them, would have manufactured a phony dossier and collusion plot for them.  

Clearly, these Marxist infiltrators knew who posed the greatest danger to their cause. Who are they precisely? These communist saboteurs bent on making America a communist plantation? 

For starters, there is only one way for a nation’s federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to open a counterintelligence investigation, in this case “Crossfire Hurricane,” into a political opponent’s, Donald Trump’s, campaign. It requires a directive or approval from the top, from the President of the United States: Barrack Obama.  

So, let’s connect the Marxist dots … 

Obama was raised by a black Marxist family, which his father abandoned, and was thus schooled in the Marxist tradition. For clarity, Marxist: communist.  

Communism: a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned, and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.  

Karl Marx. Hence, Marxism—communism by another name. And no private property rights, and people “paid” by their communist overlords as the overlords see fit, means the end of individual freedom and liberty, and America.

Note: Obama was schooled in this communist tradition. Or rather, the tradition of human slavery, oppression, and evil.  

Marxists are forced to play language games to conceal their true identity and intentions. They are indeed communists, but the term doesn’t sell well, is poisoned. So, it is replaced with terms like “socialist,” and “democratic socialist,” and of course “Marxist,” and other softer and enigmatic terms—linguistic coffee grounds to throw off the dogs. 

Professor of education at the University of Illinois, Bill Ayers, also a Weather Underground terrorist and radical Marxist, he became Obama’s political ally during Obama’s rise to power [note: a domestic terrorist who is also an American university professor, highlighting the connection between Marxism and American universities]. The Weather Underground was a 1960s radical faction identified by the FBI as a domestic terrorist group. A group dedicated to “the destruction of U.S. imperialism and the achievement of classless world: world communism,” proclaimed in its 1969 foundational statement. That’s: foundational statement. 

Ayers is a radical Marxist, and Obama’s ally and friend. 

As president, Obama lent his friendship and support to Black Lives Matter, too. Another radical group co-founded by Patrisse Cullors, who is not only a self-described trained Marxist herself, but a protégé of Weather Underground agitator, Eric Mann, also a radical Marxist.   

Along with Mann, Cullors is counted among Obama’s allies and friends, too. 

Then there is the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who said infamously, “Goddamn America—that’s in the Bible … America’s chickens are coming home to roost.” Wright is yet another Marxist friend and ally of Obama, who was a devoted 20-year member of the reverend’s church, Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ.  

Yet another man of the cloth, Reverend Louis Farrakhan, is another Marxist, and an anti-Semite to boot. Despite the Congressional Black Caucus pressuring a photographer for more than a decade to keep a photo of Farrakhan and Obama concealed to protect Obama’s political future, and the Marxist plot, the pair were nonetheless friends and allies, too. And why the Marxist hate for the Jews, incidentally, which Obama himself openly and repeatedly demonstrated during his presidency?  

The Jews are God’s chosen people, an anointed class of human beings that evil Marxists despise for being an anointed class, anointed by God. In other words, it isn’t the Jews that Marxists despise. It’s God. Otherwise, they wouldn’t persecute God’s chosen people, and conceal pictures of their evil Marxist associations, and whatnot. They wouldn’t lie and deceive people all the time, either. None of which aligns with God and righteousness, but instead evil. 

So. Highlighting all these Marxists in Obama’s personal sphere, hence the point people are trying to make about him, but never directly do:  

Obama is a Marxist too! Born, bred, and instructed. 

In fact, he is the continuation of the Weather Underground, its new millennium version. A devoted disciple who yet believes in the cult’s cause: “the destruction of U.S. imperialism and the achievement of classless world: world communism.” And evidenced by its involvement in the Russian collusion plot and the events beyond, the world shares Obama’s passion for this, too. 

So, a Marxist opposition clearly existent and pursuing its objectives should be understood, which involves rather basic principles and rudimentary logic. Marxists respect no law—no police officers, no judges, and no governments, obviously. Determined to end “imperialism,” Marxist are the law. Their attempt at communist “transformation” successful, they become the emperors, which is exactly what Obama and his fellow conspirators intend.  

What are Obama’s motivations? 

Drill down deep enough psychiatrically, and Obama is mad at his father for abandoning him, and in fact confessed this resentment. It is to say, Obama has daddy issues, still—like so many other fatherless black men. Raised by a family teaching the Marxist tradition and hate, Obama was then eagerly receptive to the hate, and to revenge. For one reason or another, this is undoubtedly the case for every Marxist radical. Abandoned or ignored or mistreated formatively, they are enraged at the world and want to get even with it. A quest for vengeance in which they have learned to be clever. 

“We have never been a collection of red states and blue states,” Obama says. “We are, and always will be, the United States.” Such inspiring proclamations aren’t authentic and heartfelt. They are employed to (a) disguise the contempt he holds for America and (b) to facilitate the evils he has planned for American “imperialism,” which we know to be the plan for all the fellow Marxists in his personal sphere, beholden to a foundational group pledge. Marxists like Black Lives Matter (BLM) leaders, who Obama repeatedly invited to the White House, and even publicly praised: “They are much better organizers than I was when I was at their age, and I’m confident that they are going to take America to new heights.”  

“Organizer.” The soft term for radical Marxist, and more linguistic coffee grounds. 

Of course, Obama doesn’t aim to take America to “new heights,” but rather to new communist lows. How do we know? Because here he is publicly touting his radical organizer creds and Marxist allegiance: “They are much better organizers than I was …” By his own admission, Obama is a fellow Marxist. A communist dedicated to “the destruction of U.S. imperialism and the achievement of classless world: world communism.”  

And here everyone thought Obama was a servant of the people beholden to the United States Constitution, the rule of law, and an advocate for American imperialism and supremacy.  

Obama is not the only Marxist leader in this latest communist coup, either.  

Weather Underground supporter and fellow Marxist, Susan Rosenberg, was sentenced to 58 years in prison in 1984 for possession “of 740 pounds of explosives, an Uzi submachine gun, an M-14 rifle, another rifle with a telescopic sight, a sawed-off shotgun, three 9-millimeter handguns in purses and boxes of ammunition.”—so much for the liberal stance against guns and gun violence. A fraud now, um, shot to hell. To mean, Marxists like Obama have no issue with guns or gun violence, as his beloved war-torn and ignored Chicago would testify. Marxists are after guns solely to disarm people, to take away a citizenry’s ability to resist Marxist radicals bent on unopposable authoritarian control.  

It is to say, an armed citizenry is a threat. 

“We’re caught, but we’re not defeated. Long live the armed struggle!” Rosenberg shouted as she was taken from a New Jersey state police barracks in Berlin for arraignment in Federal Court in Camden. Long live the “armed” struggle surely won’t sit well with today’s anti-gun and –second amendment liberals. Incidentally, can fellow Marxists be “bitter clingers,” too? 

Interestingly, Rosenberg’s sentence was commuted. She now serves as vice chair of the board of directors of Thousand Currents—a radical, grantmaking institution. An institution that financially sponsored whom?  

Fellow Marxists, of course: the Black Lives Matter Global Network. Again, “We’re caught, but we’re not defeated. Long live the armed struggle!” Clearly, Rosenberg meant it. 

By the way, notice how there’s a red line of radical Marxism always connecting these people like local mobsters on an organized crime unit’s war room wall? 

More intriguing, however, is who commuted Rosenberg’s 58-year sentence, just 16-years completed. Who would free a police-murdering Marxist lunatic found in possession of so many normally detestable guns that cause so much detestable gun violence? Who would forgive all these heinous sins? 

President Bill Clinton. On his last day in office, no less—to avoid those, nasty optics.  

Don’t be misled, Bill might be a Marxist, but he’s not a committed Marxist, like Hillary. She is the real militant. Not only would Bill rather chase the broads, of all ages. He has too big an adolescent need to be liked to be a Marxist zealot. In fact, Hillary having tried to establish communist healthcare in Bill’s first term, to massive public displeasure and the first republican controlled house in 40 years, Bill ran sprinting back to the middle and away from all that radical zealotry—all to be publicly liked again, of course. Bill is too weak for militant Marxism, too enslaved by his adolescent needs and desires. His father dying in a car crash, Clinton likely has daddy issues, too, which didn’t manifest as anger in this case, but as an insatiable, juvenile need for approval, both public and female.  

Hillary on the other hand, now she is committed! She has the radical’s narcissism, hate, and resolve. We know it’s true, because what else could compel someone to stay married to a serial philanderer after being publicly humiliated by him time and again?  

Only one thing could be so compelling, a larger cause and goal: Marxism, and the destruction of American imperialism. And by the way, Hillary is no Tammy Wynette. 

In the cult of Marxism, aka liberalism [more linguistic coffee grounds], the person dies so the cause can endure and succeed. That’s the radical Marxist, a martyr. He/she will endure whatever abuse and humiliation they must so the cause can survive and meet a triumphant end. Marxists are zealots, heretics. They are fanatical sociopaths on a mission, and whose attitude toward humankind is thus: the lion doesn’t concern himself with the opinion of the sheep.  

Author David Horowitz:  

“Radical utopians [Marxists] seeking to change the world invariably have three traits in common. These flow from the radical nature of their mission, which is to change the world. First, radicals are in a hurry. Their task is large and the opportunities to achieve it scarce. America’s political culture is specifically designed to support incremental reforms not abrupt breaks with the past. Ramming through transformational changes on the basis of razor thin majorities is exactly what the American system is designed to frustrate and thwart. But this is the very goal of radicals, and they are consequently pitted from the outset against the majority.  

“Second, because radicals are in a hurry, they’re impatient with process and persuasion which makes them generally tone deaf to the majority that opposes them. Radicals dismiss their opponents, because once their schemes are implemented — by whatever means necessary — they’re confident that a majority will see just how liberating their policies are, and they will be grateful. Blinded by arrogance they prefer government by mandate and diktat to the frustrating conversations that are the lifeblood of a democratic system.  

“Third, radicals generate energy for their movements by singling out a social subgroup, usually a racial or religious minority, to demonize as the enemy of these liberating schemes. In this way they remove opponents from the deliberative process and deny them a proverbial seat at the table where they can express their opposition.”* 

What Marxists learned was that they couldn’t accomplish their mission from a dank and dingy Weather Underground headquarters. Bringing down imperialism required a bigger platform, more power to do things. So, no more small-minded radicalism of the past and rathole headquarters; we need to think bigger! All the terroristic bombings and anti-American crusading of the ‘60’s and ‘70s weren’t winning new converts as quickly as they arrogantly demanded. And if the American people weren’t consenting and converting, then communism would be forced on them, diktat-style. 

Thus, the new strategy: winning elections and imposing Marxism. 

The new strategy employed the radical Muslim approach: say and do whatever you need to say and do to win elections and assume power, because our ideological ends justify the means. Then talk all that patriotic, red, white and blue stuff to the American people— “We have never been a collection of red states and blue states. We are, and always will be, the United States”—while you secretly undermine and destroy American imperialism.  

Marxists needed to be on the inside, in power. Thus, they committed to (a) getting fellow Marxists, one by one, into public office and government agencies and the judiciary, and (b) eroding the foundations of America, step by legislative and immoral step, for an ultimate conversion to communism. All led by the most committed radical, Hillary Clinton, who for decades laid the groundwork for Marxist D-Day. 

Enter: Barack Obama 

A committed Marxist—and beneficially “African American, articulate and bright and clean,” as Joe Biden characterized him—Obama presented the perfect opportunity for an all-in Marxist D-Day. Who could challenge him? When anyone dared, fellow radicals and establishment sympathizers called them racist. When anyone challenged his Marxist agenda, they were called climate deniers, or homophobic, or xenophobic, or whatever was required. Obama was clearly the Marxist movement’s long-awaited opportunity, who spent eight years of his presidency aggressively advancing the cause. Problem was, Clinton thought it was her turn to be president in the 2008 presidential election.  

As Donald Trump put it on the campaign trail in 2016, “The Clinton’s are criminals, never forget that.” Hillary and Bill have escaped more crime in the last 30-40 years than anyone: White Water, Uranium One, illegal computer servers, destroying subpoenaed emails, destroying phones with hammers, lying under oath on countless occasions, two rigged primary elections, a treasonous Russian collusion plot—the last a crime CIA Director, John Brennan, informed President Obama about, who then employed his CIA and FBI and DOJ in assistance. All this crime, and yet here is an entitled Clinton demanding to be President of the United States (think Marxists aren’t narcissists and sociopaths?). So, how did the Clinton’s escape so much egregious crime? 

Fellow Marxists and sympathizers in the right places: a radicalized and corrupt deep state, judicial system, and news media. Since when can a treasonous plot be committed and the news media refuse to expose it, and even address it? 

When they are fellow Marxists, sympathizers, enablers, and co-conspirators.  

That is how it was done; Hillary in the lead. A key point in Trump’s terrifying speech:   

“The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. We’ve seen this firsthand in the Wikileaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of US sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends, and her donors.”  

Before Barrack Obama in this Marxist scheme was the Clintons, the most successful government infiltrators. Marxists have tried this before but were sniffed-out by republican senator from Wisconsin, Joe McCarthy. Numerous communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers had infiltrated the United States federal government, universities, film industry, and elsewhere, McCarthy charged. And the establishment was apoplectic then for the same reason it is now: Marxists and their scheme have been sniffed-out and exposed.  

The Clinton’s have proven the most successful, however. Mostly for Bill Clinton’s charisma and likeability, which shielded Hillary’s communist treachery. Hillary was a leachy lamprey, fastening herself to a cool, charismatic host, who wasn’t motivated by all that radical stuff, but who was nonetheless useful to the cause. For his daddy issues, Bill Clinton was emotionally weak and vulnerable, and therefore Marxist prey. 

Much to Hillary’s elitist ire, Barrack Obama received the 2008 Democrat Party nomination, however, winning the presidency twice. Contentious though the pair were on the primary trail, these fellow Marxists knew there was greater Marxist work to be done and completed. Unified, Obama made Hillary Clinton Secretary of State his first term. In that appointment, Obama brought the Weather Underground leadership back into the White House, along with access to the vast Marxist network Hillary had set in place.   

Hillary’s crowning moment was to be 2016; the lead Marxists’ presidential reward for years of dedicated and destructive Marxist labor. Her succeeding two terms were to be the 16-year bookend to Obama’s eight-year “transformation” of the United States. Having set the table for Marxist transformation, it was her task, her crowning achievement and reward, to finish the job.  

In other words, electing Hillary president in 2016, Marxist were going all-in on an imperialism destroying communist takeover of the United States.

Now is the time!  And only one person stood in their way:  

Donald Trump.  

What is important to understand about Trump’s entry into the race is that everyone in the establishment knew he was a cultural elite, and that he’d shared their exclusive space his entire life. They knew he understood the machinations of the establishment, particularly the financial networks. He was a Washington outsider, but an establishment elite insider. As such, he knew the people, the systems, and the establishment way.  

This is precisely why Trump’s slings and arrows speech was so astute, informed, and deathly alarming. His establishment intimacy, along with having the financial resources and backbone to withstand any and every establishment attack, is what made Trump the Marxist Antichrist. When he gave his speech, calling Washington a swamp of corruption, and the news media “fake news,” politically corrupt, and conspiratorial. He not only left no doubt about his intentions. He made ignoring the charges impossible and forced an establishment address. 

The Marxist cabal was in sheer panic for the campaign speech alone. Trump winning the election, however, a rigged election, no less, sent them beyond panic and into desperation. Despite their treasonous efforts—Clinton’s server and classified and subpoenaed email crimes all dismissed, Wikileaks revelations ignored, a rigged democrat primary, spying on the Trump campaign, voluminous unmaskings of Trump campaign personnel, an ongoing and treacherous Russian collusion plot—the cabal could not overcome the American people, who sent Trump to the White House. The reason for the stunned establishment expressions on election night wasn’t the electoral loss, necessarily.  

Worse: the evidence room was unlocked to 8 years of Marxist treachery, specifically the last year and their treasonous spying and collusion crimes.  

The incoming commander in chief would certainly uncover their crimes and expose their Marxist plot, which is precisely what happened. To say the infiltrators were terrified is a gross understatement. They were panic stricken. They are panic stricken still. How do we know? 

Two iconic, international brands—Clinton and Obama—have been relegated to the political sidelines for seven years, and to virtual obscurity. For 26 years they were front-and-center and involved in everything. Followed by the media every day and everywhere, they were ever-present. And since election day 2016? 

Virtual obscurity. Why? When facing indictment, Rule Number One: keep your mouth shut. 

Since then, it has been a collective establishment effort to conceal both the crimes and the intent of these modern Weather Underground Marxists. To keep those crimes and intent concealed means that Trump cannot, must not, survive or be validated. Hence, the incessant, seven year and counting legal pursuit and assault. Hence, the unprecedented actions taken against him post-presidency and naked lawlessness.  

When Trump said that he “[takes] all of these slings and arrows gladly for you,” the American people, it’s certain he did not comprehend the cost.  

Marxists don’t care about the costs, specifically where it concerns human beings, either aligned or opposed. They don’t care about their constituencies: African Americans, Hispanics, LGBTQ, women, children. They merely use them, exploit them. What happens to African Americans—Clarence Thomas, Ben Carson, Shelby Steele—when they challenge or abandon the Marxist cause? Marxists set out to destroy them. Same with Hispanics, LGBTQ, women, children, and all the rest.  

So, go ahead liberal constituencies, challenge your Marxist allies. See what happens. Of course, we don’t have to see what happens, because we’ve already witnessed it. Radicals defend their constituencies if they’re loyal to the cause, and destroy them for disloyalty. Because nothing can compromise the cause. And what does this say?   

It makes the point: radicals exploit their constituencies. Constituencies constituted by human beings for which Marxists clearly have no feeling or compassion at all. All who get in their way, who compromise the Marxist cause, who impede the path to a communist goal, will be destroyed. Thus, the constituency loyalty and silence.  

Utterly ruthless, Marxists are singularly focused on the mission, which includes destabilization and destruction. Hence, their attack on law and order—the stabilizing aspects of every civilization. They couldn’t care less who gets shot, how many people are maimed or die, how many women are raped, how many children abused. Revolution comes at a cost, and Marxists are willing that everyone but them pay those costs. For Marxists must be around to run things, to enjoy the fruits of power and control, of the new imperialism, they plotted so carefully and worked so hard to establish.  

Proof radicals don’t care about human life is clear in their abortion advocacy. Further proof, if more were needed, emerged in a congressional investigation of the current border crisis. Fellow Marxist and Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkus, grilled by Congressman Matt Gates: 

Gaetz: “800,000 people have encountered your CBP (Custom and Border Protection) agents, and those folks have been released into the country. Some of those people are going to commit crimes, aren’t they? Will some of the 800,000 commit crime? Yes or no?” 

Mayorkas, pained: “Undoubtedly.” 

Gaetz: “Undoubtedly. And so, the Americans who are the victims of the crimes of the people you release into the country are collateral damage that you are willing to accept in order to have our border function as a turnstile. You’re willing to accept that collateral damage.” 

Mayorkas objected, of course, and lied, as all worthy Marxists are trained to do when truth is spoken. But the answer is yes. Clearly yes: human collateral damage is acceptable, namely American human collateral damage. 

All that matters is the Marxist mission: communist conversion.  

Not human life.  

Not the people who pay you to secure and protect them.  

Not the US Constitution or law. 

Only “the destruction of U.S. imperialism and the achievement of classless world: world communism” matters. The mission primary, everything else to Marxists is expendable.  

People think publicly exposing and humiliating Marxists like Mayorkas in front of the entire nation on television means something. It doesn’t. It’s meaningless to these cultists—to any cultists, really, who believe in what they are doing, in their cause and mission, evil though it is. Did Mayorkas confess anything, acknowledge any facts? Did he seem chastised and contrite by the obvious truth(s)? Did he head straightaway to the border to straighten out the mess, to secure the border, and to redeem himself? 

No. Because, that would compromise the mission. 

Hillary and Obama executed a treasonous plot against the United States and the American people. Did they and their fellow Marxist traitors care what it did to the country, to the citizenry? Did they care how much the plot cost taxpayers and their consequently enhungered children (everyone knows how much liberals care about starving children)? Encouraging disobedience and rioting in the early years of Trump’s presidency, did they care who got hurt or how much property was damaged and destroyed? 

This same Marxist cabal framed and financially ruined Lt. General Michael Flynn, a war hero and military veteran. They even leveraged Flynn’s son in the plot to break the elder Flynn and force a confession of guilt. Did they care for either’s innocence? Did they care about leveraging a human being, a son, no less, to destroy another’s life, his own father? Russian collusion was a fraud. Did they care about destroying Trump, his family, his cabinet members, his supporters—all of which are human beings?  

This same cabal used a virus to steal an election. Did they care about election integrity or election laws? About how many fraudulent mail-in ballots were counted? Did they care about a disenfranchised citizenry? Rigging the 2016 and 2020 democrat primaries against Bernie Sanders to guarantee Clinton and Biden victories. Did they care for election integrity and election laws in that case? That they were subverting democracy and cheating the nation’s voters?  

Okay, let’s do have a conversation about gun violence. The rule for discussion is this: getting rid of the second amendment is off the table. With that, we cannot then have a conversation about gun violence, because getting rid of the second amendment and guns is the Marxist cabal’s mission. Do they care that the second amendment is codified in the constitution? That it is a law “uninfringeable?”   

No. No to all of this, in fact, because Marxists respect no authority or law in making themselves the authority and law, per a Marxist plot. 

Therefore, people must get in their heads, must accept it, must believe it: a cult of Marxist communist radicals have infiltrated the United States government and are on a determined mission to destroy its republic status to achieve not just communism, but “world communism,” which they have no less stated publicly. They have infiltrated the country’s major institutions, too, to include the Democrat Party. A party that now belongs to them. The evidence?  

Where are the moderate Joe Lieberman democrats of old? Moderates who respect the rule of law, the constitution, and love America and its military? The faction doesn’t exist anymore because radicals drove them out and took over the party: You’re either with us in our communist quest, or you’re the enemy! On every piece of legislation, the party votes in lockstep. When it’s legislation that secures, strengthens, and prospers America and the American people, the party, in lockstep, votes against it.  

To say the “Democrat Party” is united is no longer accurate. Marxists now in charge, it is clearly the Communist Party. A new party using the old Democrat (D) moniker as cover. And they want to maintain the ruse, that things are still legitimately political, to continue executing their plot. 

So, Marxists communists being arrogant sociopaths who despise God, human beings, and individual freedom and liberty; who intend to enslave people under a Marxist regime, which they implied in their foundational statement; and who rig elections and flagrantly ignore all American law in pursuit of the objective. What term best characterizes such a scenario and people? 

Evil. Of which there is but one brand. The same made public by Tucker Carlson before his untimely and inexplicable exit from Fox News.  

America’s differences aren’t political anymore. They have transformed into a struggle as old as time itself: good versus evil. Individual freedom versus communism, or its many aliases. 

The problem for this current crop of communists is, in their all-in attempt to transform the United States into a communist nation, they got out over their skis in 2016 and were caught committing treason.

All roads lead back to Russian collusion.

Conviction for the crime means, by law, a traitorous death. However, this is secondary, believe it or not, to something even more dreadful: conviction means a catastrophic setback for the Marxist movement. To get so close to success, and then, poof! The mission exposed and back to square one, if ever to be successful again for at least a generation, perhaps two.  

It’s a scenario unthinkable, unimaginable, utterly devastating. 

Everything at stake, is Trump’s claim then such the stretch: “Anyone who challenges their control … they will lie, lie, lie, and then again, they will do worse than that. They will do whatever is necessary.” And isn’t “whatever is necessary” what we are witnessing? Flagrant lawlessness? Unprecedented legal actions? Desperation? 

Therefore, Marxists must be ruthless. To demonstrate how ruthless, they installed an elderly man with dementia into the presidency via election fraud to not only implement their Marxist agenda, but to take all the public heat for its implementation.  

He won’t know; he’s got dementia! they say chuckling, scheming in their secret Marxist lair.  

Of course, the downside to dementia is that it’s an undependable condition. The sufferer could become incoherent and uncontrollable. Hence, the strategic and dependable stand-by: Kamala Harris, another fellow Marxist too vacuous to be anything but a Marxist. And if you think Marxists aren’t this cunning, devious, and ruthless.  

Well, you don’t know your enemy. 

The scheme is simple: along with the installed and ailing president, a highly dependable radical lieutenant like, say, Susan Rice, is installed in a domestic policy advisor role. She controls the president, whispers her handlers radical policies in his ear for implementation, such as forcing people with good credit to pay for the high-risk mortgages of those with bad credit, for example. Or perhaps, no oil drilling to force expensive fuel and the implementation of Green energy objectives. Totally unjust and brazenly communist actions, which the ailing president then undertakes with demented, oblivious passion. When the public gets angry, there is the incognizant president to take all the heat, while the “organizers” chuckle and continue their Marxist work unscathed.  

Such acts are far beyond unseemly; they are evil, of which there is but on brand. 

Or the border. Who is Enemy Number One in America to these Marxists? Privileged, supremacist white people. The border being purposefully left wideopen by President Biden, an incognizant tool of his Marxist leaders, who is allowed in by the thousands illegally?   

Brown people—along with terrorists, criminals, drugs, crime, and disease.  

Marxists want to change the racial dynamics of the United States to expressly upend her, and are exploiting a disabled elderly man to do it. They don’t care about the disabled elderly man. In fact Obama once told the elderly** to basically take their pain pills and die quietly, that there would be no further healthcare options for them because they were aged healthcare liabilities unworthy of Marxist government investment. This, after lying to the American people about being able to keep their healthcare, no less.  

Marxist don’t care about the disabled or elderly. Trying to upend America, they don’t care how much terrorist danger or how many violent criminals they invite at the border, either. They don’t care how many Americans are murdered or raped by both, or how many children suffer or die of fentanyl overdose. In fact, they want all of this!  

Upending law and order requires chaos and upheaval. The more the better, and collateral damage be damned. 

Hence the glaringly obvious: Marxists are evil. They thrive on hate and revenge, the very nature of evil. Hate and revenge are their fuel. They want confusion and turmoil—also the very nature of evil. Because that is the way they have lived, angry at daddy, at the world. In fact, they create the instability to get what they want, to transform what is into what they want. In this case the death of imperialism. Otherwise known as: America.  

Theirs is a quest wherein lying is both necessary and, not just acceptable, but honorable. Horowitz, again:  

“Lying it a political necessity for radicals because by their very nature radical proposals are too extreme for the general population to accept. Democracies depend on transparency in government. But a common political strategy is to conceal the true nature of the legislation being proposed in order to limit public scrutiny of its contents.” 

In other words, Marxists say people can keep their healthcare when they can’t. They say the border is secure when it is not. They say an infrastructure bill is for the nation’s infrastructure refurbishment, when they intend to use the money to further their New Green Deal environmental objectives. And they not only lie like this. They find nobility in lying. Because they are advancing the Marxist cause they believe to be supreme—a cause of evil they believe to be supreme. 

Thus, Marxists are tired of having to win elections. Elitists in a supreme cause, they feel they shouldn’t have to run for office, and are finished doing it, obviously. Clinton rigged the 2016 Democrat primary against Bernie not once, but twice. Corrupting the entire government, she and Obama executed the treasonous Russian collusion crime. And there is covid and the 2020 election stolen by mail-in ballots and other election fraud. All these brazen attempts to subvert democracy present a fact indisputable:  

Marxists are finished with elections.  

The smartest people in the world, Marxists feel power and control are their birthright and that, furthermore, they really shouldn’t have to tell voters that it’s their birthright. Voters should not only accept this axiom; they should know it, instinctually. Because that’s the way things are. Because the way Marxists want to do things is a way things should be done, and voters will be “grateful” for it, even if they are not.  

You don’t “deal” with people like this. You stop them. They must be stopped.  

Otherwise, as Limbaugh used to say, you’re not going to recognize your country, which is where we are now and merely a matter of permanency.  

“What distinguish[es] communists [isn’t] their disdain for money and or their trenchant critiques of capitalism,” Horowitz wrote. “Rather, it [is] their paranoid imperative to crush whatever they perceived as a challenge to their indomitable pursuit of power.” Marxists love money and wealth like everyone else, and the capitalist idea that allows greater access to more of it. They lie and profess to oppose both, which should come as no surprise from inveterate liars. But their real fear is opposition, enmity found in democracy, human rights, freedom of speech, and guns—threats which must be crushed. And where are these traits currently in existence and practice? 

America. And who is currently targeting the traits and America? 

Marxists. Camouflaged and rebranded as liberal progressives. 

Liberals don’t care that they are “torched” or “destroyed” or “humiliated,” as is claimed in so many conservative memes and video replays where they are intellectually and argumentatively taken to the woodshed. Impervious to shame and humility, none of this sets them back or makes them recalculate and amend their positions. One can’t marshal enough facts to change their minds, either. Because one of those facts is: they are liars with evil intentions.  

Marxist intentions. 

Therefore, no truth whatsoever can be allowed to survive and endure, but instead must be “crushed.” Why? For where established facts and truth like steppingstones and breadcrumbs lead: to their exposure and destruction.  

Marxists don’t want America and Americans manufacturing things. As for Trump vowing to return manufacturing back to America in 2016, Obama asked, “What magic wand do you have?” Well, the same one Obama has, of course, but will not use for his Marxist ambitions. Marxists make it harder and harder to manufacture things and to do business in America because they want America to be dependent, not independent. They shut down oil drilling because they want America dependent on oil, not energy independent and leading the world. And nothing says dependency like trillions of dollars in national debt, to which liberals keep purposefully, strategically adding.  

A dependent citizenry means power for Marxists, means weakness, vulnerability, and an expedited Marxist transformation. And the acts to achieve the weakness and transformation are no less occurring in full view.  

Marxists aren’t going to say that their goal is American vulnerability and a communist transformation: We’re here to make communist slaves of the American people! So just, heads-up, folks. That’s our plan. They are going to talk about “sacred democracy” and issue fake patriotism, “We have never been a collection of red states and blue states. We are, and always will be, the United States” They’re not going to expose themselves or their scheme.  

But then, they don’t have to.  

Their behavior is the tell, and it never lies. And where their ideas and agenda lead—straight to powerlessness, enslavement, and control—is yet another tell. 

Every day of his presidency these same Marxists attacked Ronald Regan for championing the American people and making America secure, prosperous, respected, and great. Every day for seven years they have attacked Trump, this time legally, for the very same thing. Every day they leave America’s border wide open to terrorists, criminals, drugs, and illegal brown-people immigration. Why this specific pattern of Marxist behavior?  

They are executing a plan: “the destruction of U.S. imperialism and the achievement of classless world: world communism.” And in Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, two humiliating dimwits, they don’t even care to run a good cover anymore.  

Marxists are evil, of which there is but one brand and but one lead organizer and founder. They are all-in criminal cultists, deeply committed believers and zealots. Martyrs who will do quite literally anything to achieve their communist ambitions, aided by fellow cultists, sympathizers, enablers, and useful voting idiots. Their sole enemy is law, constitutional law, for which they have contempt and are determined to eliminate for new law: communist law, their law. For when one law ends, one must emerge to take its place and assume control—the truth Marxists neglect and conceal. 

Thus, theirs is a mission that their targets must recognize, acknowledge, and prevent.  

Otherwise, doom.  

Know how hard it is for a citizenry to regain control of their country once it has been overtaken by a communist regime? It’s bloody, and near impossible. And to think, citizenries just give their freedom away to a collection of exposed liars. 

Perhaps communists are right. Citizens are naive peasants desiring to be ruled—at least, some of them.  

After his appearance in a New York court room, Trump said, “All I ever did was try to protect our beloved nation from those who want to destroy it.” Clearly, he was on to something. For their 2016 election failure and ultimate exposure, the Marxist conspirators have been forced into all-in crisis mode, sparing nothing and no one, the result yet undecided. How does such a formerly unfathomable transformation even have a chance of success?  

It begins with a foundational statement, and a plan. 

Evil’s greatest advantage is that it takes people and societies too long to recognize and oppose it. 

*Horowitz, David Final Battle, p.149.  
**For playback efficiency, exchange begins at the 28:00 mark. 

Note: this article contains opinion. Good opinion.  

©JMW 5/2023  
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

Imagine a prosecutor in a major trial making her case. After laying out the circumstantial, if compelling, evidence to the rapt jury. She steps conspiratorially to the jurists and says, “But this, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this,” pointing to the widescreen hanging on the courtroom wall now glowing with life, “is the most important thing. Lights, please …” 

“Here’s the defendant, here,” she says, on her way to the courtroom widescreen, pointing to the video figure, newly appeared. “His face concealed, he emerges from the shadows to the lighted porch. A lefty, he raises the gun with his left hand, then shoots the victim in the back of the head at close range [the weapon firing, soundless]. Freeze it! Right there,” she directs the video engineer. The assailant’s hand frozen in the air.  

Slowly, dramatically she returns to the jury. “Now. Ladies and gentlemen. How do we know, beyond any doubt, that this assailant is the defendant?”  

A pregnant pause for effect.  

A smile creeps onto her face. She then turns to the widescreen, walking, pointing …  

“Because the defendant forgot to take off his unique, family-crested wristwatch.”  

She says it deadpan for maximum effect—the video engineer ever-so-slowly zooming-in for the clear and incontrovertible visual.  

 Visual and strategic perfection! 

“The defendant is so foolish … or so arrogant,” shrugging coyly, “I don’t know, you decide,” she says to the jury, politely grinning. “He is so foolish and arrogant, that he forgot to take off his easily identifiable, uniquely family-crested wristwatch. This one right here,” she says sharply, displaying it to the jury looped around her finger. “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, note the family crest on the band. The very same” she points to the widescreen, “as the assailant.”  

Strolling down the jury box for thorough viewing, “It’s always the small things, ladies and gentlemen,” she adds. “The defendant thought he’d committed the perfect crime. And yet, he forgets … to remove … his watch.” 

Courtroom chuckles … 

And via this “most important thing,” the entire world now sees this defendant for what he truly is: an evil criminal. A liar. A con artist. A phony. A loathsome human being. A sociopath.

The veil is lifted. The mustard’s off the hot dog. 

A lot can be learned about people from this “most important thing.” In fact, it is striking what one can see, and learn, when light is cast at just the right pitch, exposing the tiniest imperfections otherwise invisible, yet massive in significance. People get caught-up in the minutiae and drama, the things easily noticeable. Meanwhile, standing there plainly visible is the inconspicuous perpetrator wearing a ball cap, hands in pockets, smirking.  

Evidence so clear that later it’s said, How did we miss that?! 

From the Map Room in the private residence of the White House, a silent finger countdown [in 5…4…3…2…1…] led then President Bill Clinton into his confession of an affair with intern Monica Lewinsky. What is the “most important thing” in this confession?  

Confessing the affair, Clinton confirmed that he knew all along he’d had it. 

Clinton knew all along that he’d had the affair, and yet he and his political allies, to include the mainstream news media, a group in entirety professing to champion women, tried to destroy Lewinsky—and all the other woman who accused Clinton in the past: Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones.  

It’s the feminist thing to do, destroy those you profess to protect and champion. 

Clinton knew he’d had the affair, and yet he played word games with investigators. 

Clinton knew he’d had the affair, and yet he wagged his finger at the American public and demanded they “listen to him.” Because he was going to “say this again,” which he did via a menacing glare and rhythmic lectern thumping with his fist: “I did not. Have. Sexual relations with that woman. Ms. Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie. Not a single time. Never! These allegations are false! And I need to go back to work for the American people.” 

Of course, the allegations weren’t false. They were true, revealed so for an errant dollop of presidential semen, forcing Clinton’s Map Room confession. Remarkably, although not so remarkable for a narcissist, a confession in which Clinton remarked, “This is gone on too long, cost too much, and hurt too many innocent people … our country has been distracted by this matter for too long.” Sentiments that were indeed true, but only because Clinton kept denying what he knew he had done and lying about it. 

Pitching the lamp but a few degrees for clearer viewing, it is abundantly obvious Clinton isn’t merely a bad person. He is an evil sociopath, which is not a characterization too far.  

And indeed, it’s “the most important thing.” 

In the witness chair in federal court, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, Robbie Mook, was asked about the phony Alfa Bank story used to try to destroy Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential candidacy. Under oath, Mook confessed, “We discussed it with Hillary; she agreed with the decision [to share the false and contrived story with a reporter, in furtherance of a treasonous plot].” Only, Clinton had Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, and Perkins Coie lawyers, Michael Sussmann and Marc Elias, on the payroll. A political and legal cabal that had come up with the story in the first place—in fact, were paid to come up with the story.  

In other words, the matter didn’t need to be “discussed” with Clinton by her campaign team, nor did the release of the story to the news media need her agreement. And why not?  

“The most important thing,” of course.  

When days before the 2016 election Hillary Clinton sat down with her iPhone and Tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.” Clinton knew she had paid for the fake story herself via Perkins Coie, and that she was doing so not in furtherance of a mere hoax of her design, but in service to a treasonous plot of her design. A plot to destroy Trump’s initial candidacy, that continued into the Trump presidency. A plot that included a costly, purely theatrical, three-year investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Purely theatrical because Mueller was investigating Clinton’s plot and not an actual Trump crime. Because there was no Trump crime, only a manufactured crime being used as part of a treasonous plot. So then, Clinton knew the investigation was pure fantasy, too, and let it run its destructive course anyway.  

As one reporter put it, “The Russian/Trump [fraud] that Mrs. Clinton sanctioned [and engineered] has done enormous harm to the country. It disgraced the FBI, humiliated the press, and sent the country on a three-year investigation to nowhere”—and it indicted the Obama administration, too. For Clinton did not command and direct federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. That was Obama’s role. 

All this national upheaval taking place for years and, the whole time, Clinton wasn’t just the engineer. She knew she was the engineer—facilitated by co-conspirators: Obama, his FBI, CIA, DOJ, and the corporate news media, too.  

So. Once again pitching the lamp but a few degrees for clearer viewing, it’s abundantly obvious that Clinton isn’t merely a bad person. Like her husband, she’s an evil sociopath, too, which is not a characterization too far, either.  

And indeed, it’s “the most important thing.”  

Standing on the presidential debate stage with Donald Trump in 2020, Joe Biden claimed “nothing was unethical” about his son Hunter’s job at Ukraine’s Burisma Holdings, employment attained for Joe’s political status, and to financially benefit Joe, the “Big Guy.” Of the laptop where all this incriminating data was stored, Biden offered a response given him in debate prep, “There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said, what [Trump’s] accusing me of, is a Russian plant.”  

Cognitively impaired, Biden, predictably, muffed the line. What he meant was 51, not 50, former intelligence officials had signed a letter suggesting Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation. Disinformation meant to, yet again (Russian collusion), swing the 2020 election for Donald Trump. 

Joe “The Big Guy” Biden having cashed the Burisma checks, however, and having guaranteed they continue by bribing Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko. Biden wasn’t merely lying about the laptop being Russian disinformation. Like Bill and Hillary Clinton, he knew he was lying.  

Knowing. Big difference. 

So again, pitching the lamp but a few degrees for clearer viewing, it is abundantly obvious that Joe Biden isn’t merely a bad person. He is an evil sociopath, too, which is not a characterization too far, either. 

Finally, the corporate news media. Or the “mainstream” news media, as it’s called. Or the unaffectionate but true, “Fake News” media. They see all this evil corruption taking place, particularly that of Hillary and Biden. They have their reporters in the courtroom who hear Mook’s confession about Hillary, her being the author of a treasonous plot. They see the video of Joe Biden confessing bribery in Ukraine: “Well, son of a bitch! …” They see the signed receipt showing Hunter Biden dropped off the laptop in question, and that it’s unquestionably his laptop, and that the data contained therein is therefore true, and damning. They know precisely what Fox news and so-called “conservative news” outlets are reporting about the laptop is true, and therefore damning.  

And what is the corporate news media’s response? 

They either directly lie in their reporting, “51 former intel officials say laptop is Russian disinformation.” Or they lie by omission, which simply means they don’t report what they know. 

Key word: know.  

And if they know and aren’t reporting what they know, what does that imply? 

Pitching the lamp but a few degrees for clearer viewing, it is abundantly obvious that the corporate media, the “fake” news media, isn’t merely a bad industry constituted by bad people. It’s an evil industry populated by sociopaths, too, which is not a characterization too far, either. 

So, there you are showing liberal voters all this incontrovertible and condemning evidence. Bill Clinton confessing to the affair. Mook confessing Hillary’s treasonous plot. Biden bribing Poroshenko and cashing the Burisma checks. The “fake” news media caught repeatedly lying, in service to a political ideology. All knowing full well that they’re lying. And what is the response of liberal voters? 

Pitching the lamp but a few degrees for clearer viewing … 

Liberals aren’t political foes. They are evil sociopaths. Worse, they’re evil sociopaths incapable of seeing themselves as such. And not only is this not a characterization too far.  

It’s the most important thing. 

©JMW 4/2023 
All Rights Reserved 

JMW’s latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.