Author: JMW

All the news coming out about their leaders’ involvement in treasonous crimes, you can see the frightened stares and head shaking denial from the liberal faithful:  

No, no, no. It’s not true!   

It isn’t that the faithful really care about Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or any of the treasonous Russiagate conspirators. They couldn’t care less about those people. Just like those people couldn’t care less about them—and they both know it. What they all care about is that their shared ideology, their Liberal Cult, is being exposed now for the fraud that it is and has always been, from its leadership down to its lowly, dependent, and thusly compliant voters.  

The liberal faithful can’t stand the traitorous news. It is like hearing a terminal diagnosis or of the untimely death of a loved one—they just can’t accept it, don’t want to hear it. No,no,no! If it didn’t appear so childish and pathetic, they would put their hands over their ears and chant, “La-la-la-la-la …!”  

And here is the worst part about the emerging evidence: not one of the accused, not a single conspirator, has offered a denial. Even worse, they’re lawyering up.   

Not a good sign at all. 

How do you refute a conspiratorial email saying you have to “stick to” the treasonous Russian collusion plot, and that the plot has to be a “team sport?” Gee, isn’t “team sport” synonymous with “treasonous plot?” 

As I said, not a good sign at all.  

So, here is the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), the highest intelligence office and law enforcement agency in the land, dropping almost daily evidence bombs concerning treason in American politics. It is the biggest news story in American history, nearly 250 years, regarding accusations from the nation’s highest authorities, no less. It is a blockbuster event, to be sure, and whether the charges prove legit or not, where is the news media? Why aren’t they chasing all the accused down and shoving microphones in their faces for answers? As it was during the Russian collusion era, where are the deep, probing investigations into these historic charges and the nightly, breathless news reports?  

None of this is happening, of course, and realize how bad that is—that a nation’s entire news media, save Fox News, is ignoring the biggest political scandal in American history. One that involves not just the highest crime of treason, but documented treason per the ODNI and FBI, and treason currently under grand jury investigation, even.  

I don’t know—sounds pretty legit and newsworthy to me.  

And the news media is not just pretending the story doesn’t exist. It is calling the ODNI’s and FBI’s declassified and publicized text messages, emails, and incriminating documents—all undenied by the accused, mind you— “lies” and “political retribution.” Gee, can you pretend a story is nonexistent and, at the same time, call the evidence coming out about it lies and political retribution? Either the story exists or not, right?  

Here is something apparently novel: how about reporting the nonexistent story in Russian collusion-like detail and profusion, and allowing viewers to decide if it is lies and political retribution or not?  

Because the way the news media is doing it now, they are contending there is no story, and that the emerging evidence about the non-story is all lies and political retribution. How can there be false and retributive qualities to a story that doesn’t exist?  

News media: There is nothing to see here, folks.  
But, what about these incriminating documents? 
They’re lies and political retribution.  
But, you said there’s nothing to see … 
Yes. That’s right.  

And then, reassured, liberal voters fall straightly and peacefully back to sleep. 

While the remainder say, “WTH is this BS?!” 

So what the news media is saying to the American people ultimately is that they, the news media, are more trustworthy and believable than America’s ODNI and FBI. Don’t trust the nation’s top intelligence office and law enforcement agency, folks. Trust us, instead! The News Media! We’ve got your back, America!  

Gee, wonder if the news media’s role in this treasonous conspiracy has anything to do with these haughty supremacy vibes. 

And understand, theirs wasn’t an act of treason against Donald Trump. It was a treasonous attack against American democracy and the American people. The media would love for voters to continue thinking and believing the crime was against Trump and only involves Trump. Because then the media is only calling Trump and his administration liars, and not the American people. That’s key, keeping the fight political, between Trump and the establishment. This way Trump is isolated, and the American people are fans at a big political brawl, observers unaffected and uninvolved, munching popcorn and with no skin in the game. If the American people realize the treasonous attack was against them, however, and that the crime was intended for their demise. Then the media is throwing shade at the American people and calling them liars.   

Of course, the media has only to be concerned about half of the voting populace, knowing 75,000,000 liberal voters are shaking their heads and don’t want to hear the bad news about their leaders and gods, the media being one of those gods. Incriminating documents are emerging that prove their government committed treason against them, and liberal voters, 75 million strong, are saying expressively, No. No. No. It’s not true! It’s terrifying, really. Not just that 75 million people shake their heads in defiance about treasonous crimes of political officials. But that they can observe cognitively challenged candidates like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and still vote for them, purely out of yet more defiance. And defiance toward what, exactly? 

Well, that answer is Neapolitan. 

The baseline is Liberalism is a massive fraud, one that makes Bernie Madoff look like a rank amateur. Hence, the religion’s leadership are obviously con artists, and the membership obviously dupes, eager dupes. Thus, some liberals remain defiant on behalf of their religion because they don’t want to bear the humiliation of being dupes. They know they have been conned, and admitting so doesn’t set well with the ol’ ego. So it is best to continue the con and to defy your own intellectual foolishness. 

Liberalism is the religion of malcontents, too. Aggrieved? Victimized? Pissed off? Then Liberalism is for you! Some liberals remain defiant because, well, they need something to rage about, and somewhere to rage. This group likes to rage. So the last thing they want is peace, obviously. Lying to these people is like throwing a bloody carcass into a pen of starving Hyenas. This group couldn’t care less if they have been conned. Cons taste good! Gives us more energy to rage! That’s how this group sees it, and it is precisely why they remain so defiant on behalf of the religion. 

Liberalism is the religion of the needy, too. Of course, they aren’t really “needy,” in the classical sense, given many in this group are supposedly poor, but are yet obese, and have computers and cell phones, several televisions sets, and expensive jewelry, and 20’s on their hydraulically outfitted hoopties, from which they peddle drugs and weapons they can’t afford, but somehow can afford. But it isn’t just them. There are countless liberal NGO’s and non-profits who suckle at the religious power teat, too, who are equally dependent. It is a massive, diverse class of “needy” people dependent on the mother’s milk of not just survival, but prosperity. All remain defiant on behalf of the religion because, well, suckling is effortless. 

For various reasons, the religion is everything to these people. What? Liberalism isn’t a religion, you say? Well, it has leaders and doctrine and followers. Members who, with fervent zeal, not only blindly believe the doctrine, but have trust and faith in their mere mortal leaders and gods.  

Why, sounds just like a religion to me. Textbook, even. 

And this being so, America isn’t on as good a footing as people might think. When 75 million voters hear news of text messages and emails from their nation’s leading crime agencies about treasonous offenses involving their religious leaders, and are loathe to hear about it. Well, that nation is teetering perilously on the precipice of collapse. Communist collapse, that is. And obviously, whether it is naivety, dependence, loyalty, stupidity, or whatever, 75 million liberal voters are just fine with that. 

I imagine this is how it has always been for fallen nations in history. Some humans want to be independent and left alone to live life their way and by their rules, and some need the comfort and security of other mere mortals deciding for them. Eventually, because human beings grow comfortable and lazy and entitled, more people than not are seduced and become dependent. Then the servile majority cedes themselves and the nation to their human gods, and dreadful communist rule ensues. At least, that has been the undeniable pattern. 

Ironically, though, when this transfer of authority and power happens, the liberal faithful get exactly what they don’t want now. The humiliation starts. The raging ends, or else. And standing in endless lines for what was once abundant and common, the suckling is over, and liberals and everybody else become a whole lot leaner.  

It is often said America is the “greatest” country in the world. People take that to mean America is great for being superior in this thing or that, or even many things. But what it really means is, America is great because it gives human beings power over their individual lives and destinies, never to be encroached upon by another human being, or group of human beings, as in government. Independent and in command, the citizen is the boss. Collectively, the citizenry is in control. They tell their officials what to do, not the other way around. 

And simply, that isn’t meant for everyone. 

The unworthy are easy to recognize, too. They are the ones with frightened expressions at news of treason by their religious leaders. 

©JMW/8-2025 
All Rights Reserved  

Let’s make an experiment and remove every human from planet Earth. The entire species now absent, how many problems are there? Where are the strife and conflict? The complaining, accusations, and arguing? The senseless wars, the violence, the societal and planetary destruction? Imagine the world going on without all this human dysfunction and turmoil: the seasons beautifully changing, the animals frolicking, birds singing, every aspect of nature thriving, peaceful, and in perfect balance and harmony.  

In 1872, Ulysses Grant set aside Yellowstone National Park, more than 2 million acres, as the first formal nature preserve in the world, to be under the managerial care of the United States Department of the Interior. By 1934, the park service acknowledged that the once plentiful “white-tailed deer, cougar, lynx, wolf, and possibly wolverine and fisher are gone from Yellowstone.”  

In other words, humans began “scientific management” of the park, began messing around with the balance of nature, and screwed everything up. Until humans came along, nature was doing just fine on its own. Humans, well, they thought they knew better. 

But clearly humans don’t know better. In fact, they are the one and only species that doesn’t have its act together—but that genuinely believes it has its act together, and better than all the rest. So convinced are they of this supremacy, they believe themselves necessary and worthy managers and regulators of all the rest. How very, god-like. But then, because nature has its act together, humans abandon the chaos of hustling and bustling cities for the peaceful, serene calm of suburbia and rural areas, which is incredibly appealing. Then, eventually, they turn that environment into another hustling and bustling agent of chaos, too.  

Hence the conclusion, concrete and undebatable: humans present all the earth’s problems.  

The question is why? Why can’t humans get their act together like the rest of nature and make the world a better place? What’s their friggin’ deal, anyway? There is an answer, a foundational explanation. Found in a place that, evidently, no one thinks to look, which is odd given the obviousness, and given all the scholarly and ministerial minds searching to solve the many mysteries of life. The answer? 

It’s found in the Garden of Eden. Or rather, in the garden’s forbidden fruit. 

Within the garden stood the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Hanging from its unique, winsome branches among the leaves was its delectable forbidden fruit, which God told Adam and Eve, the first couple, never to eat, or even touch. Of course, they did both, which resulted in a drastic change in human physiology and negatively altered human behavior. Consumption of the fruit wasn’t just an act of human disobedience toward their maker. Something happened to Adam and Eve, something physical, perhaps spiritual. Something that transformed humankind forever. It is to say, the fruit produced an affect, a result. The result? 

Self-awareness.  

The ministerial class likes to message that God cares for you and that Jesus loves you, and they do love and care. But never once in all my many years of religious instruction have I heard analyzed the immense significance of the garden’s forbidden fruit. Neither how it has influenced human behavior from time immemorial, nor regarding the challenges it presents to humankind, and the world. So, we’ll analyze it here. 

Upon eating the fruit, Adam and Eve didn’t immediately fall over in convulsing fits. Genesis author, Moses, put the reaction this way: “And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked.” Simply, the first couple each took a bite of the fruit and, shazam! Their eyes were opened—and not for their eyes being physically closed and then suddenly opened, but opened to new perceptions, to a new level of consciousness they had never experienced.  

No convulsing. No dramatic scene. Just, a perceptive awakening. 

So, for clarity: pre-consumption of the forbidden fruit, the first couple looked at each other’s bodies and had no awareness of nakedness at all, or moreover that nakedness was either good or evil. Then, post-consumption, they instantly noticed a penis, vagina, breasts, potential sexual stirrings, and a desperate need to cover themselves up, which they immediately did, sewing fig leaves together to fashion makeshift clothing.  

So the effect of the forbidden fruit was self-awareness and subsequent self-consciousness—and not just consciousness of one’s own existence, but consciousness of one’s own appearance, behavior, image, desires, and so on. Most important was the eternal dichotomy now in place: good and evil, and the human ability to perceive it and to differentiate. Naturally, humans became self-centered and driven by their lusts, which is precisely why God, via the Bible, commanded self-discipline and a servant’s spirit as countermeasures to the new human nature. 

It’s logical to conclude that, had the fruit been left alone, human beings would be walking around today naked without any sense of awareness or discomfort, either one. As clearly intended, human nakedness would be normal and accepted. Nobody would care about their diminutive penises or sagging, unperky breasts; about their fat rolls and double chins; their crows feet, eyebags, and laugh lines. No one would care about their imperfect smiles and excessively hairy bodies, their birthmarks and moles, or their many other appearance-related oddities, that wouldn’t be oddities at all. The cosmetic surgery industry wouldn’t exist, nor the toupee industry. And it’s not that modern human beings wouldn’t care about these things; it’s that they wouldn’t know to care about them. Having no awareness of self, no perception of self, none of it would be noticeable or even matter.  

Humans would be free from all their self-conscious baggage! 

The garden’s forbidden fruit laced with self-awareness, however, all these perceived human flaws and inadequacies do matter. Humans are forever cursed with self-consciousness. Interestingly, Satan told the first couple that if they ate the fruit, they would become gods. And for once, Satan wasn’t lying. Self-awareness creates an inflated sense of self-worth and a god-like, “me first” sense of entitlement. In contrast, it creates senses of human inadequacy, unworthiness, and despair, too—both reasons Satan wanted Adam and Eve to eat the fruit. Playing on their self-awareness-driven sense of god-like entitlement, and their despairing insecurities, vulnerabilities, and desires. Satan knew he could more easily exploit and destroy human beings individually—his eternal goal and mission.  

The opportunities were limitless! 

How do you exploit and destroy people with no self-awareness-driven weaknesses? Who don’t fancy themselves entitled gods and perceive their flaws? 

Not only did consuming the fruit disobey God, whom Satan despises. The resulting self-awareness made for easy human misery and destruction. 

[Satan rubbing his hands together in ruinous glee]. 

Virtually every moment of their lives, humans walk around individually consumed by the world’s, by other human being’s, perception of them: how they look, what they say, how they behave. Other than sleep, there is no respite from the cognitive prison. Humans are virtually consumed with self. In contrast, take the gorilla in the zoo. As people look on through thick plate-glass, he lies in a hammock, defecates in his hand, and throws it on the glass at onlookers. The gorilla doesn’t care what people think, because he has no burdensome self-awareness.  

Humans, on the other hand, do care. And why? 

Because they were the only species to consume forbidden fruit.  

This clearly observable phenomenon—the fact humans are the only creatures in all of nature endowed with self-awareness—undeniably affirms the Bible, its account of creation, and moreover the existence of God. In other words, if one needs a solid, a tangible instead of spiritual, reason to believe in God. Well, here it is. Right there in your self-conscious mind. 

Self-awareness isn’t a gift. It’s a curse. A curse chosen for humankind, but a curse, nonetheless. All of humankind’s challenges return to it, too, and there is no turning back. No undoing the spell. There is a way to live with it, however. It’s becoming a believer, in God. It’s understanding, via the Bible, why humans are the way they are and what makes them, you, tick. It’s transcending that nature to become something better, something healthier and happier, and for the creator’s purposes, something more exemplary and useful. And then through that disciplined and aspiring effort, it’s being an example for others, encouraging them to better, healthier, and happier for themselves. 

Humans are either improving or degrading, are thus either aspiring or succumbing to their nature, to the curse of the forbidden fruit. So when your priest or pastor says, “We’re called to be something better, are called to excellence!” He ain’t lying, either.  

Only, the call isn’t to be better, which clearly creates all the problems.  

It’s to be worthy.  

Get that straight, why, it’d be like heaven on earth. 

©JMW 7/2025 
All Rights Reserved 

There was a man in ancient times who, every day and night, made his home among dank, mountainside tombs, wherein he cried and cut himself with stones. This poor man was miserable, obviously. He was depressed and desolate, then enraged, then even more despondent because there seemed no end to his misery. Day and night, his suffering was all he thought about. It consumed him. 

The townspeople had tried to control the troubled man, had put him in chains and various other tethers, all broken by the man into pieces. Thus, nobody went around the tombs because he was a frightening menace.  

Now. Were this man living in modern times, a team of psychiatrists and therapists would have him diagnosed with everything—manic depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder. Complete with a matching pharmaceutical regimen, of course. Doctors would be boasting about their diagnostic expertise, science about its role in advancing technology and chemical remedies. It would have all been a lie, however. Because this man, this patient, wasn’t mentally ill.  

He was demon possessed.  

Readers might recognize the biblical story written about by eyewitnesses Matthew, Mark, and Luke, Christ’s disciples, who not only chronicled the incident but the man’s incredible cure. Sitting in his dark, macabre tomb one afternoon and contemplating his unending misery, the man saw a boat beach on the shore nearby. Observing the invaders, the possessed man eyed Jesus. Yes, that Jesus. Instantly, the man ran towards and fell on his face at Jesus’ feet. “Please don’t torment me,” the ailing man begged. Ever compassionate, Jesus asked the man’s name.  

“Legion,” he replied, “for we are many.” 

In service to the current infirmity before him, Jesus commanded the evil spirits to depart from the man, which the demons dutifully did, but only after imploring to be cast into a herd of hillside swine. Entering the pigs, the entire herd then ran violently down a hillside, over a cliff, and into the sea, where they all drowned. Afterwards, the freshly exorcised man wasn’t just clothed, in his right mind, and greatly relieved. Finally happy and hopeful, finally himself again, he was eternally grateful. 

He was cured! A result neither traditional nor modern science and medicine could have ever achieved. And why doesn’t anyone ever conclude that?  

Why doesn’t anyone ever consider the spiritual aspect of human health and the subsequent limitations of human healthcare? It’s like science and medicine are the end all for human health, are the human experiences’ only hope for survival and a healthful continuance. Given this seaside exorcism, this is obviously untrue. God created humans from dust. For their continual disbelief and disobedience, God, throughout the biblical text, plagued human health in various and numerous ways. To be plain, he made humans sick, then either took their lives or cured them. 

Hence, God seems a pretty big player in human health, as this possessed man’s restoration would certainly validate. In fact, God appears the boss of human health—individually and collectively, doing with it as he pleases. 

Science and medicine had zero bearing on this seaside exorcism, and would have no bearing on such an illness today. In fact, despite the visible and yet bleeding cutting scars, and the glaring emotional distress, both industries would have mocked the idea of demon possession. To demonstrate how absurd, they would have shot the patient full of Thorazine and pronounced him cured and now living his best life.  

“Who needs God when you’ve got Thorazine!” 
Science: “We invented that!”  

To science and medicine, a person walking around a drug-induced zombie is cured. “See? Thanks to medicine and science, folks, the patient can now move on to a productive and rewarding life!”—they proclaim, as they ease the brain-frozen, hospital-gowned zombie forward for crowd display. 

End the Thorazine regimen, however, and the man’s back where he started: still demon possessed and miserable, which, again, medicine and science can do absolutely nothing about.  

So then, how supreme and deistic-worthy are medicine and science really?  

Personally, I wouldn’t want to do without them, particularly during allergy season, and when I have the flu, or a kidney stone attack, or any one of the countless health issues and emergencies I’ve endured in my life. It’s certain everyone else feels the same way. 

Even so, science and medicine clearly have their limitations.  

It would appear the only truly deistic-worthy physician and scientist is God. But then, say that at the press conference where physicians are going on and on about their diagnostic skill. Or write a rebuttal article for a science journal touting the supremacy of God and the obvious ineptitude and arrogance, comparatively speaking, of science and medicine. Let’s see if that piece ever meets with publication. 

Vain creatures, every human loves to be lauded. Physicians and scientists are no different. 

The point here is that this poor, tormented man is a human trainwreck. Living among tombs and dead people, he’s dirty, unkempt, and mutilating himself. Emotionally unstable, he’s accosting people and threatening them. Alone, he cries frequently, then laughs maniacally, then cuts himself some more to relieve the inner pain. All of which is psychotic behavior, of course. But then, not really psychotic, because he’s actually demon possessed, his ailment spiritual. In any case, given the supplied visual, I’d posit this:  

Does this tomb-dweller not resemble your average American liberal? 

Consider today’s liberals: blue haired, tattoos and piercings so numerous and gaudy that liberals look alien [tattoo needles and piercings: the modernized “cutting himself with stones” in relief of inner pain]. Liberals are constantly either depressed and sad or enraged and riotous, and viciously accosting people in mobs. Because their political candidate lost an election, they are on their knees in public squares wailing in emotional agony. Most heinously, they are calling young girls at summer camp “lil’ cunts,” and proclaiming they deserved to drown in a tragic Texas flood.  

Looks and sounds just like a demon possessed tomb dweller to me. How ‘bout you? 

Normal people amble by and, like Legion from his ancient tomb, liberals race to accost them: “Fascist!” “Racist!” “Evangelical!” Like young Regan MacNeil in the Exorcist, they do just about everything but green projectile vomit onto people [at least not yet], which would be the icing on the demon-possessed diagnosis cake. But do we really need that final, vomitous piece of disgusting evidence to draw the demonic conclusion?  

What? Suspects aren’t truly “evil” until they green projectile vomit on people? 

The original Legion was filled with demons, “… for we are many.” Don’t liberals appear plagued by the same problem? They make spectacles and mockeries of themselves. They abuse themselves, humiliate themselves—all with zero self-awareness or shame, incidentally. Vacillating abruptly between immense cheerfulness and blind rage, they are clearly unstable and miserable. They demonstrate no self-discipline or –control, no ability to reason, and no civility.  

So then, what’s the difference between them and Legion? 

Of course, most liberals aren’t lodging in cemeteries these days, and most don’t appear dirty, disheveled, lunatic Legions of old, either. Most would never abide such a beggarly appearance or existence, either one. It’s difficult to pull-off superior-to-you status when you look like a whacked-out tomb dweller with self-inflicted laceration scars all over your body. Despite the fine exterior, however, modern liberals still have the same evil and subsequent misery inside of them. They just conceal it, so no one knows. So how do we know they are filled with the same evil?  

Behavior. It never lies. 

Where do you think Legion would be today? Watching Fox News and shaking his head mournfully at the latest liberal mayhem? Or in the resistance trenches with modern liberals? 

Yeah. Me, too. 

It’s not really Donald Trump that liberals loathe. It’s the good that he is doing, the righteousness he is restoring. If Ron DeSantis or J.D. Vance or some other Trump-styled candidate wins the presidency in 2028 and comprehensively continues Trump’s policies. Then liberals will suddenly say, “Okay, now that Trump’s gone, we’re on board with morality, the rule of law, and all that MAGA American greatness?  

With Trump gone, suddenly liberals will recognize but two genders?  
Suddenly women’s restrooms and locker rooms will be female only? 
Suddenly men competing in women’s athletics will become ludicrous?  
Suddenly abortion will become murder?  
Suddenly trans and gay pride books peddled to children will be creepy and wrong?  
Suddenly the deportation of illegal criminals will be lawful, vital, and cool?  
Suddenly, every evil doctrinal belief that liberals hold dear will become corrupt, wicked, and negotiable? 

We’re supposed to believe Trump is the only thing standing in the way of all this transformational righteousness of the liberal collective? 

Trump isn’t standing in the way of the righteousness. It’s the righteousness itself.  

Vice President J.D. Vance: 

“[Liberals] don’t need a unifying ideology of what they are for, because they know very well what they are against. What unites [them] isn’t the ideas of Thomas Jefferson, or even Karl Marx. It’s hatred. They hate the people in this room. They hate the President of the United States. And most of all, they hate the people who voted for him.” 

All true, except, what liberals truly hate the most is God, the righteousness he represents, and the goodness he commands. And why do liberals hate these things? 

Simply, liberals are modern Legions, and their inner demons command it. 

Everyone else should take comfort in this fact: the very presence of evil is evidence of the Almighty God on whom they depend for victory.  

[sign of the cross]. 

©JMW 7/2025 
All Rights Reserved 

Beginning his interview of then Health and Human Services Secretary appointee, Robert F. Kennedy, republican senator Ron Johnson lauded Kennedy, a democrat, for setting aside his political differences to work with President Trump on an important initiative: finding the root cause of so many chronic health problems in the United States.  

“We need to get to the answers [of chronic illness],” Johnson said. 

“There is no issue that should united us more than this chronic health epidemic,” Kennedy agreed. “There is no such thing as republican children or democratic children; these are our kids. Sixty-six percent of them are damaged. I know what a healthy kid looks like, because I had so many of them in my family. I didn’t know anybody with a food allergy, peanut allergy. Why do five of my kids have allergies? Why are we seeing these explosions in diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological diseases, depression? All these things are related to toxicity in the environment.” 

Kennedy is right, at least about the explosions in disease—ask any doctor. As potential HHS secretary, now confirmed, he claimed he is the person to fix the problem, too.  

“I don’t think anybody is going to be able to do this like I have—because of my peculiar experience; because I’ve litigated against these agencies. When you litigate against them, you get a PhD in corporate capture [where private industry uses its political influence (money) to take control of the decision-making apparatus of the state], and how to unravel it. I’ve written six books about these agencies. I know a lot about them; and I know how to fix it. And there’s nobody who’ll fix it the way I do, because I’m not scared of vested interest.” Rather: Kennedy is neither (a) a corrupt bureaucrat nor (b) scared of Big Corporate Food. 

So, Kennedy has the answers to human health. But does he? All he is really saying is government agencies, specifically the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), apparently, are on the take and corrupt and allowing people to be chemically poisoned by Big Food. Per the Trump era, we know political corruption government-wide is incontrovertibly true. But people are being chemically poisoned? Is making their customers and fellow human beings sick really the strategy of America’s food producers?  

Meanwhile, doctors one and all are complaining that Americans are not only eating too much but have unhealthy diets, and are advising them to eat less, exercise more, and lose weight. Instead of chemical poisoning, could this be the problem? Gluttonous Bending-Elbow Disease and a lack of self-discipline?  

If Kennedy were to say, “Americans are fat and unhealthy. Eating too much they’re digging their own graves.” The medical community would certainly agree. But how would those remarks go over with the masses?  

About as well as they would over in the doctor’s office.  

“You’re fat and unhealthy, Mrs. Smith. You’re digging your own grave.” 

Gasp! “Why, the nerve!”  

“At 5’2” and 345, Mrs. Smith, I feel obligated to intervene, to limit the blast radius.”  

Suffice to say, where it concerns health and healthcare praise from the masses, targeting Big Food is much more profitable. 

Okay, so what happens when we sue Big Food into oblivion, mark all their corporate chests with a giant red A, and then have the same problems we had before? What then? When we find out we still haven’t the solution? When we still have the explosions of diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological diseases, depression—all these things related to the poisoning of our daily bread by Big Food?  

Who do we blame then? 

Trust me, a culprit will be determined, suspects ranging from the earth’s toxic soil to every participating food production, handling, and preparatory entity and product in between—too many waves in microwaves. Too many metals in silverware. Too much non-stick on non-stick items. Someone will be culpable, because there is money and celebrity in it—monetary jury awards from litigation, and heroism for being the person to defeat corporate evil and heal all humankind.  

Incidentally, notice how the evildoers are always corporations? Know why? 

Because that’s where the money is! 

So basically, a lawyer and politicians are claiming human health is within their domain and under their control. Listen to them. Trust them. Do what they say, and the result is human health and healthcare Nirvana! After centuries of medical practice, and with such incredibly advanced medical tools and technology, nobody knows more about the human body than modern medicine and physicians. At least they can say, “Yeah, we’ve seen this before. Let’s start a potassium drip and monitor blood pressure. That should fix it.” At least physicians have a background in the human body and human health, and vast, centuries established research resources at their disposal. Medicine is more prepared than ever to diagnose and treat illness and disease. Yet even physicians have their limits. Else when someone dies, physicians wouldn’t say, “Well, we did all we could.”  

Perhaps no one would die, or even suffer, if physicians were as medically qualified as lawyers and politicians.  

The point is human beings are claiming to have the solutions to human health, to effectively have control of human health. While some possess superior knowledge and expertise in the field, does the discussion of human health really begin and end with human beings? Is the healthfulness, the very lives, of all humankind really in human hands?  

Shoulder-wedging my way through the human hubris, I have a question: 

Where does God fit in to the human health discussion?  

Presumably, 2.5 billion Christians and Jews around the world would like an answer to the question, too. The creator of the universe and all living things doesn’t have a say in human health?  

Reading my Bible, I time and again come across human health related implications, and even proclamations, within the text. Contrasting all the human doctrine about human health with scripture directly in hand, I catch myself asking:  

Is anyone else reading this freaking thing?    

The fact is there are but two theories of human origin, evolution and creation, and the issue of human health is implicitly bound to one of them. On one hand are human beings—science, medicine, and politicians and lawyers, evidently—claiming to have the answers to human health, which, regarding the politicians and lawyers, doesn’t appear to be about health so much as it is green. Or as God would put it: mammon. And on the other hand is God, whom the scriptures repeatedly confirm as, well, the boss of everybody and everything, to include human health.  

Like it or not, the Bible does come with certain unavoidable implications. For example, if God created everything, then his power and authority are not only implied, but supreme. Who can challenge a being that speaks a universe into existence and creates humans from dust?   

The Creator, God controls everything, and humans are his subjects. He declared himself the “alpha and omega,” the beginning and the end, which is almost universally interpreted as a mere power flex. However, it means something deeper, that God is the beginning and end of all earthly matters, is indeed the ultimate “truth” in all matters. All earthly matters begin and end with him, specifically the matter of human health. Whatever humans conclude or say about human health, or about any other issue of the human experience, for that matter, is a subordinate view. 

The most obvious example of God’s control is his power over life and death. He obviously created life, which implies he can destroy it, too. There are many biblical examples of this destructive power, too. One being the flood, where every human on earth but Noah and his family perished. A more singular and practical example is the death of Uzzah, an unfortunate man who merely touched the Ark of the Covenant to steady it. The offense angered God, who summarily killed Uzzah on the spot.  

Taken to a local hospital, one could be certain physicians would conclude an opposing cause of death. Uzzah’s heart gave out; he suffered a myocardial infarction. He had a stroke, was suffering severe dehydration. And evidence for these conclusions may even present.  

But we all know the real cause of death in this case: God.  
The Supreme Commander of Human Health.  
Would the medical community ever make such a diagnosis? That God did it? 
Folks, we’ve determined that God killed this poor man.  
Have we ever heard this determination even once? 

Another example is Nabal, an evil human being. Nabal angered King David, who was riding out in a fury to get even. Nabal’s wife, Abigail, rode out to stop the king. Per an offering of food and drink, she begged and subsequently inspired the king’s mercy on behalf of her husband. True to his words, “Vengeance is mine,” God, for David’s discipline and mercy toward Nabal, “smote Nabal, that he died.” Nabal’s heart, the scriptures say, “died within him, and he became as stone.” Ten days later, he succumbed. Nabal was a rude, mean-spirited man, and a gluttonous drunk. Taken to the local hospital his death would have surely been labeled alcohol-related—addiction, abuse—or a result of his apparent gluttonous habits.  

But again, we all know the real cause of death: God.  

The most thoroughly compelling example of God’s power over life, death, and human health is King Hezekiah. A loyal and beloved servant of God, the king lay sick in bed. Via the prophet Isaiah, God told the king to set his affairs in order because he would not recover from his ailment. Distraught, the king prayed, asked God to remember his devotion and loyalty. Moved with compassion, God not only healed the king, but granted him 15 more years of life, er, health.  

So, if God healed the king of his ailment, then it can be inferred God was responsible for the ailment, too. Then granting the king 15 more years of life, er, health, the conclusion is obvious— 

God is in absolute, unopposable control of human health.  

Birth to death, every single aspect of human health falls within God’s domain and is under his command. Go ahead, pick an ailment. Any ailment. Let’s take leprosy, for example. Modern medicine tells us leprosy is a chronic bacterial infection that primarily affects the skin, nerves, and mucous membranes. A plague that, thankfully, modern antibiotics can now cure, that is if God allows. How do we know God has power over leprosy, and over its cure and incurability? That God is the final health and healthcare authority? That the very breath and life of all humanity, the level of sickness and misery and suffering and healthfulness people endure and enjoy, is in his hands alone? 

Moses, the book of Exodus: 

“And the Lord said furthermore unto [me], Put now thine had into thy bosom.  And [I] put [my] hand into [my] bosom, and when [I] took it out, behold, [my] hand was leprous as snow.” 

Afterward, God had Moses return his leprous hand into his coat and, pulling it out, it emerged cured. In preparing Moses to lead his people out of Egypt, God used the incident to convey not just his power and authority, but his control over human health, which he later demonstrated even more profoundly via the Egyptian plagues—frogs, lice, flies, murrain, boils, hail, locusts, perpetual darkness, death of the firstborn—before the Jewish Exodus from Egypt. And if people need to hear God directly proclaim his power over the disease and ultimately human health. Speaking to Moses and Aaron: 

“I put the plague of leprosy in a house of the land of your possession.” 

Just as he put the plague on Moses’ hand and then cured it.  

So, what about a more common health problem, like, say, hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoids are swollen and inflamed veins in the rectum and anus, a condition doctors say can be caused by straining during bowel movements, sitting on the toilet for long periods, lifting heavy objects, obesity, and certain medical conditions such as portal hypertension. The condition can be hereditary, too. Uncomfortable though the ailment is, people use over the counter remedies to mitigate the discomfort and, in most cases, consider it a temporary nuisance born of mostly common, everyday influencers. 

Could such an average, ordinary health condition be under God’s control, too?  

Could such an ailment even be found in the Bible?  

Indeed, it can. 

The Philistines took the ark of God from the Israelites and brought it to the people of Ashdod, the sixth-largest city in Israel, on the Mediterranean coast. This apparently displeased God: 

“But the hand of the Lord was heavy upon them of Ashdod, and he destroyed them, and smote them with emerods [hemorrhoids], even Ashdod and the coasts thereof.”  

In response, and to rid themselves of the uncomfortable plague, the Philistines took the ark to Gath, a Philistine city. What happened to the people of Gath?  

“[God] smote the men of the city, both great and small, and they had emerods in their secret parts.” 

Modern medicine also says hemorrhoids can develop without any apparent cause at all. Perhaps there is a Divine cause it should now consider.  

How about pregnancy? The entire process of bringing life into the world is obviously a human health matter. Women want to have children. In the most favorable conditions, some repeatedly try and fail inexplicably. How come? They meet all the necessary requirements, have all the required equipment. So, what is the problem? Modern medicine has its own answers to the difficulty. But could God, the Creator, have control of the womb?  

“Before I formed thee in the belly, I knew thee,” God famously told the prophet Jeremiah. So then, that would imply, yes. God not only has control of the womb, but both control and foreknowledge of the life that is formed within. A good example is the prophet Samuel and his mother, Hannah. One of two wives to Elkanah, Hannah, though fully equipped and striving, could not become pregnant. Why not? Samuel, via his signature book: 

“The Lord had shut up her womb.” 

Though modern medical tests would have surely declared otherwise, Hannah’s inability to have children wasn’t for infertility or some other common modern medical reason. In control of human health, God was preventing conception. Distressed, Hannah prayed fervently to God, who heard her petition and had compassion, and blessed her with one of the Bible’s most esteemed prophets, Samuel. 

Another highly esteemed biblical figure, Abraham, lied about his attractive wife to protect themselves. Visitors in a foreign land, Abraham feared other men would slay him to have his beautiful wife for themselves. So, he told everyone she was his sister. The news pleased the land’s king, Abimelech, who sent for Sarah and took her for himself. God showed the king in a dream, however, that she was Abraham’s wife. Despite immediately returning Sarah to Abraham, there was yet a punishment for King Abimelech. The Punishment?  

“The Lord has fast closed up all the wombs of Abimelech’s house.” 

God issued a plague of infertility, which was rescinded only after Abraham prayed for the king and his house.  

Plagues, pestilence, disease, human suffering and healthfulness—it is all clearly and indisputably in God’s control. In other words, everything related to human health is within God’s domain and under his command. At least, if one believes the Bible and in God. Humans endure hardship and infirmity at his discretion and command, which means his pleasure and displeasure with people individually is the sole determinate in their affliction and healthfulness. The Psalmist made this crystal clear: 

“Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits. Who forgiveth all thine inequities; [and] who healeth all thy diseases.” 

Of course, certifying the Psalmists’ claim was Jesus himself, the Son of God, who, during his relatively brief time on earth, resoundingly reaffirmed God’s control of human health. Observing Christ’s miracles firsthand in the City of Nain, the disciple and physician, Luke:  

“And that very hour [Jesus] cured many of infirmities, afflictions, and evil spirits; and to many blind he gave sight.” 

Jesus healed every health issue known to humankind: the deaf, the crippled, the anxious, blood diseases, cancer, Multiple Sclerosis, etc. And yes, even the ailments headlining a “chronic health epidemic” in a senate appointment hearing: “diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological diseases, depression.” And if all that wasn’t proof enough of his father’s absolute power over human health, Jesus even raised people from the dead:  

“Lazarus. Come forth!” 

A four-day-old dead guy emerging from his tomb is what they call: compelling evidence of human health power and supremacy. 

Now. All this isn’t to dismiss or disparage modern medicine or science. These are important institutions and people doing vital work on behalf of humankind. Humans are fortunate to have scientists searching for cures, and doctors diagnosing and treating the afflicted. Humanity desperately needs scientists, physicians, and cures. In fact, it should be inspiring to this collective, to these chosen few, that God saw fit to make a physician, Luke, one of his son’s disciples. It is extremely high esteem. Humanity needs lawyers and politicians leading the advocacy charge, too, making sure we’re doing all we can as societies and nations to best ensure the health of respective citizenries.  

The problem, however, seems to be remembering who is actually in charge. Concerning human health, there is but one authority—but one sovereign determining human health and sickness, life and death, and in lone, unopposable control of the entirety of human health. To every human being, what issue is more important than health? There are a lot of important issues, certainly, but none more important. People want to be healthy and want their friends and loved ones to be healthy, too. As for the answers to this much desired human healthfulness, Moses offered the best prescription. Speaking to the Jews post the Egyptian Exodus:  

“If thou will diligently hearken to the voice of the Lord thy God, and will do that which is right in his sight, and will give ear to his commandments, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians. For I am the Lord that healeth thee.” 

Translation: Human health and well-being are in God’s hands alone. 

Nothing gets people’s attention like health problems, which is why God uses human affliction. Per his eternal mercy and goodness, however, he provides scientists and doctors to mitigate and manage the fallout and damage. But ultimately, God is in control. Complete control. Human health is in his hands. There is no money, no mammon, in this conclusion. But it’s nonetheless true. 

So, instead of pinning our health future to an appointment hearing in a senate office building, or on any other humans, for that matter. Perhaps we should include this apparently new data, if ancient and original, in the search for better human health. Perhaps Making America Healthy Again begins there.

©JMW 2/2025 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs Latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

Biochemist and genuine science fiction kook, Isaac Asimov, wasn’t much on intuition. “If intuition is as important to the world as reason [as science],” he observed, “and if Eastern sages are as knowledgeable about the universe as physicists are, then why not take matters in reverse? Why not use the wisdom of the East as a key to some of the unanswered questions in physics? For instance: what is the basic component making up subatomic particles that physicists call a quark?” 

Now, how many sages know anything about subatomic particles and quarks? Well, about as many scientists who know anything about profound intuitional wisdom. 

Asimov was a self-important asshole, obviously, not to mention nuttier than squirrel guano. Even so, he was a renowned scientist. One who didn’t think too highly of intuition and the spiritual realm, which really means he didn’t think very highly of God. He said so:  

“What nonsense all this supposed intuitional truth is, and how comic is the sight of the genuflections made to it by rational [scientific] minds who lost their nerve. No, it isn’t really comic; it’s tragic. There has been at least one other such occasion in history, when Greek secular and rational thought [scientists and science] bowed to the mystical aspects of Christianity [and God], and what followed was a Dark Age. We can’t afford another.” 

“Now, these were heated words,” wrote famed novelist and scientist himself, Michael Crichton. “And, reading them, I began to sense there was more at stake [for the science community] than the dispassionate assessment of questionable data.”  

It is to say, science wasn’t approaching the intuition phenomenon, a potential spiritual realm, with its normal sense of unemotional scientific inquiry. It was hostile toward it, instead. The question is why? Science isn’t hostile toward other unexplained phenomena. It seeks to explore and understand the rest of the world’s mysteries. That’s the function of science. Only here, with intuition, it’s not just averse, but truculently so. Being so pugnacious and defiant, clearly something is at stake.  

Crichton: 

“Asimov himself had implicitly drawn the comparison between science and religion as competing ways of viewing the world.” In other words, either God is the basis for the universe, or science is the authority, which presents a problem for science. “That, of course, opened the door to the possibility that science [itself] was a religion—a heretical position few scientists would accept. But, in reviewing the essays of [science and scientists], I began to see science and battling for supremacy against perceived threats from other modes of perception.”  

The threat being: the spiritual realm and God. 

And according to Asimov and science, God doesn’t exist, and the lab coats are in charge. 

Authority—that’s what is at stake.  

Of course, Asimov and his fellow scientists would indeed be aghast at the “religion” charge, claiming science is merely a way of getting answers about the universe—a universe in which exists no God but science, mind you. Hence, science deserves the praise and accolades and worship, not God. For example, science says climate change will incinerate the earth. Only, God says the earth is his, its daily existence and destiny under his command and control. One can see clearly the doctrinal conflict. In a world without God, however, there is no conflict. Science is the authority; its ideology the only ideology.  

But wait. Ideology? Why, that seems to imply religion, does it not? 

Indeed. Science has its doctrine and subsequent beliefs which it offers the world to be accepted and believed. So that, just like every other religion, human beings will become, yes, both believers in science and the religion’s devoted disciples. Only, God says otherwise; that only he controls the earth’s climate and its catastrophes, for example, which the flooding of the entire earth would certainly verify, if you believe that sort of thing.  

So what we have is an old-fashioned doctrinal disagreement and religious war.  

Science versus God. 

You can’t get something from nothing, wisdom with which science agrees. So then, along with humankind, the universe must have origins. In regard, God said he is responsible. Knowing full well something cannot come from nothing, science created the Big Bang and human evolution theories. Okay, but what about the matter and material that was already present? The stuff that “banged” around the universe, and the elements that allowed for human evolution via primordial stew?  

Where did that stuff come from?  
Who is responsible for that something, which could not come from nothing? For the existing matter that gives science’s theories legs and allows it to exist?  

It would appear someone predates science—someone Supreme, er, more Supreme. 

This is the point at which science becomes angry and starts spouting esoteric terms and phrases to intimidate their opponents. When you can’t defend a simple point, you start barking complex, scientific terms and phrases, which is telling because science is supposed to be the search for answers and truth. When theories and data fail, the search is supposed to begin fresh, with new data and a new hypothesis, which is what occurs in every other scientific quest but climate change, apparently, and with every other religious scientific tenet that brings in the research grant dough.  

It’s not just about the dough, however. It’s also about notoriety. These scientists might know a few things about quarks and biochemistry. But, like everyone else, they can’t keep their marriages together and their kids off drugs and out of trouble. They can’t keep themselves out of rehab, either. Ask them to build or repair something, and they don’t know the difference between a screwdriver and a circular saw. Mention screwdriver to scientists and they think it’s cocktail hour. 

That’s why the scientific notoriety feels pretty good; that’s the scientist’s limited field of expertise, is what they know, is the pathway to feeling better about their averageness. A member discovers a new star or galaxy, and then names it after him or herself. Of course, there sits God, half-eyed and sighing: “Oh sure. Bob’s Galaxy. Charming.” Then the entire religious cult swings by to congratulate Bob on his scientific discovery, before Bob goes on television to tout his keen eye and scientific acumen to the world. “There the galaxy was, just sitting there, unbeknownst to everyone but me, via my exquisite calculations.” 

Where would humankind be without its scientific gods leading the way? 

Drawing an implicit comparison between science and religion as competing ways of viewing the world, Asimov stepped in it, let the proverbial cat out of the bag—not that he was the first, or that he will be the last. Of course, we must temper our criticism toward those who associate a screwdriver with cocktail hour. Using all those scientific terms and phrases, they just seem more “brilliant” than they truly are, a truth to which ex’s, marriage counselors, and rehabbing progeny would surely all attest. 

Even so, make no mistake. Science is a vitally important enterprise, one responsible for much human progress and health. It’s just that the people who constitute it have an over-inflated opinion of themselves, their work, and of their meaning and value to the world. Clearly, they have developed not only a god complex, but a corresponding religion, science, to support their deity. Orthodoxy and supremacy that they peddle in public education, too.  

What do young impressionable minds study in school? 

Big Bang and evolutionary theory. 

What do students subsequently come to perceive and believe? 

That science is God. Or rather, that ordinary human beings are gods—grotesquely fallible and inept though they are.  

Who is then replaced as the universes’ authority?  

The real God. The Creator of All Things. 

So. One can then understand why the Science Cult, which is just a collection of leftist liberals, gets so angry when someone demands that God, the real God, be given his proper authority, and that the corresponding doctrine be taught to young impressionable minds in educational institutions. Someone such as Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction, Ryan Walters, who issued a directive to integrate the Bible into the public-school curriculum. And it wasn’t that Walters was directing daily church sermons to take place, either. 

“[The Bible, God,] it’s part of our history,” Walters said. “It’s crystal clear: you go back to American history. You look at the pilgrims. You look at the Mayflower Compact. You look at Thomas Jefferson talking about our rights coming from our Creator [in the Declaration of Independence]. You look at Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail, where he references the Apostle Paul and multiple biblical references as examples. The reality is the left and these radical, woke [education] administrators want to indoctrinate and lie to your kids, and act like there was no role that the Bible and Christianity and the Judeo-Christian faith [and ultimately God] played in American history. Well, that’s a lie. And that is, frankly, pushing a left-wing agenda on kids to try to get kids to hate this country, by saying, look, there was no morality; there was no belief in God.  

“Well, look,” Walters concluded, “the primary sources are crystal clear. Here in Oklahoma, you will see the Bible in its historical context. You will see when individuals throughout history reference the Bible, cite the Bible. Again, it’s part of our history, the rights. The left-wing activists can be offended; they cannot like it. But we will not allow them to rewrite our history.” 

Rather, We will not allow liberals and their science deities to replace God. 

That’s the core of all this scientific rancor. Via science, and replacing religion for religion, liberals can teach their religion—which is undoubtedly a religion, one that denies the existence of God—to young impressionable minds in the nation’s classrooms. But Christians can’t teach theirs, which, along with God, undoubtedly defines not just America’s founding and history thereafter, but the universe’s existence.  

Muslim studies in the classroom? No problem. 

Greek mythology? No education is complete without it. 

The role of the Creator of All Living Things in the world?  

“Separation of church and state!” 

Science and scientists might be outraged by the religious characterization of themselves and their enterprise, but that is precisely what it and they are, a religion—complete with gods and doctrine and disciples and zealotry. Worse, via the classroom they are encouraging America’s and the world’s youth, and really every earthbound human, to abandon God and to join their religion.  

Some may ask: why can’t God and science coexist? 

Answer: because good and evil can never and will never occupy the same space. 

And this is where we are in the world currently: a religious war, a foundational war, between good and evil. Science can’t explain the intuitional/spiritual realm. It can’t explain how mothers sense something has happened to a child or loved one while not in their presence. It can’t explain human premonition that comes to fruition, or how people sense unseen danger. It can’t explain how people suspect a cheating spouse without evidence, or how scientists themselves have all these same intuitive sensations. And rather than confess to the personal sensations, and to the phenomenon’s clear validity, and then explore the phenomena, as is science’s actual purpose and duty. Science dismisses it all as “nonsense” and “comic.” 

Clearly, the spiritual realm is every bit as real as the physical realm, a point Crichton plead to the scientific community in an intended speech, one he never gave. And why didn’t he speak? 

Because, evidently science didn’t want to hear it. 

Because hearing it would validate its nemesis, God: “The Spirit of Spirits,” and not only end science’s authoritative reign, but expose their evil, God-denying cult. Legitimate and personally experienced phenomenon or not, it’s wise to keep challenges to your authority tamped down, excluded from public discourse. 

As Marcello Truzzi, former editor of CSICOP (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal) journal once noted, “Scientists are not the paragons of rationality, objectivity, open-mindedness and humility that many of them would like others to believe.” 

Well, okay. But then, gods aren’t beholden to normal standards of human nobility. An idea that surely bleeds over into the god’s personal lives, to be attested to by ex’s, marriage counselors, and deistic progeny—and probably more than a few lab assistants. 

©JMW 8/2024 
All Rights Reserved 

JMW’s latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside. 

There is no plan to replace Joe Biden. There will be no plan to replace Biden.  

Biden is the plan.  

After all that has happened since Barack Obama’s treasonous 2016 Russian collusion plot to steal the presidency, it is inexplicable, almost unforgivably so, that conservative media still can’t understand the current establishment play. All that intellectual conservative muscle, and they’re arguing over how Biden’s going to be replaced and who’s going to replace him.  

Biden is the play, guys.  

Just as the four criminal cases against Trump could have been brought in 2022, and even before, all were intentionally delayed until election year 2024 for maximum political/election impact.  

Massive lawfare and election interference—that was the establishment play.  

Likewise, establishment liberals could have ditched Biden long ago, all the way back to the democrat primary in 2019. His mental health even further declined, they certainly could have dispensed with him in this year’s primary. Yet here he is, the nearly mindless democrat incumbent, standing stiff and mentally vacant in a cognitive Juneteenth haze, a former president later leading him off a fundraiser stage. 

A second Biden term—that is most definitely the establishment play. 

Biden is the establishment’s guy. Period, end of conversation.   

Everybody, and I mean everybody, knows Biden has Alzheimer’s, or some brand of cognitive ailment. Barrack Obama knows. Hillary Clinton knows. In its entirety, the Democrat Party knows. The party’s news media allies know. Biden’s entire White House staff knows. The vice president, Kamala Harris, knows. The Secret Service knows. The FBI and CIA know. Observing up close and personal what everyone else sees on television every day, they all know. They just can’t acknowledge the ailment for what it means to their political future, to their liberal ideology and, for some, for what it means to their criminal past. 

Consider what I’m saying: all these people know Biden is sick, that his mind is mostly gone. That is precisely what they say to each other in private, “Joe’s mind is gone; what are we going to do? What’s the play?” They openly confess the obvious among themselves, but refuse public acknowledgement. And that, folks, can mean but one thing:  

They’re all exploiting him!  

Exploiting an 81-year-old, increasingly decrepit, mentally failing and frail old man for their own political benefit and criminal protection. 

So, remember: when you turn on the news and liberal media personnel and political pundits are discussing normal politics and ignoring Biden’s cognitive disease. They all know he’s sick; they all know the President of the United States’ mind is gone. It is impossible not to know, especially after the debate. Yet they are ignoring the fact in simple, repugnant, and utterly soulless exploitation.  

Nice people, these liberals. Caring and compassionate. Honest, moral, and principled. Just the kind of humans you want looking after your own elderly parents. What liberals won’t do for power, right? Believe it or not, they “Pfft” at this particular misdeed. “Exploiting a senile old man?” they say. “Child’s play.” 

The shameless evil should come as no surprise. We already know they will manufacture Russian collusion evidence and commit treason. So, exploiting an old man with dementia is indeed “child’s play.” And the old man’s own wife is helping them do it, no less.  

How about that deal?  

Your “loving” wife so enamored with being Worst, er, First Lady, that she allows you to walk out on the world stage repeatedly and make a demented fool of yourself. 

As liberals say, “Love wins!” For them it’s just self-love, obviously.  

The depths of their soulless depravity confirmed, one should then know establishment liberals have no intention of replacing Joe Biden. Why not? Well, not because liberals wouldn’t walk a useless, senile elderly person to the woods of a wolf reserve and leave him for cheap wolf fodder. They have no intention of replacing Biden because, well, they can’t.  

Even if sitting in a wheelchair drooling and catching pretend butterflies, they need him.  

Why do they need him?  

Because former president Barrack Obama committed treason.  

Obama, his administration, to include FBI and CIA leadership, and along with Hillary Clinton, conspired to steal the 2016 election via the Russian collusion plot [don’t forget, Obama backed Clinton for president in 2016 instead of his own vice president, Joe Biden. Hence, the plot was clearly on. So, if you think liberals have a problem with freezing out Vice President Kamala Harris, with denying her the opportunity of being the first black, female president. Well, think again]. Actually, the Russian collusion plot was a back-up plan in case Clinton failed to win, an action meant to protect the conspiracy and the conspirators themselves.  

Nevertheless. Obama’s vice president, and an original conspirator with skin in the game, Biden was/is needed in the Oval Office by the conspirators because they can’t trust anyone without skin in the game with presidential power and authority. That’s why Biden had to be the democrat nominee in 2020 and ultimately president, despite his obvious and declining cognitive health, and even the potential optics of him drooling and catching pretend butterflies from his wheelchair in the future.  

Simply, the traitors needed a fellow conspirator in the White House to conceal their treasonous coup, and they need him still. Biden wasn’t a choice; he was a must. The real question is how he won the democrat primary in 2020.  

Does James Clyburn really wield that much national influence? 

The news media, on the other hand, they need a Biden presidency because, via the coup, their cult’s leaders are in danger of being exposed and prosecuted for treason, which puts the news media in subsequent danger of losing its cultural power and control—the power to influence elections for the cult’s leaders, which, of course, ensures the news media’s power and control.  

Obviously, when cult leadership is caught in a treasonous plot, the entire cult suffers.  

The cult’s continuance, their power and control maintained—that is most assuredly the establishment play. 

A man, a president and now presidential incumbent, suffering glaringly obvious cognitive decline, and known to be suffering, no less, has not merely been escorted to the presidency and White House by an entire political party and nearly an entire national news media. Despite his disability becoming yet more glaring and incontrovertible after his ascendance, he has been allowed to remain president. While the political party and news media pretend he is, as ultra-devoted cult member Joe Scarborough put it, “Normal.” 

“Normal,” he says. Meanwhile, the White House is currently tamping down reports Biden is stepping down for his cognitive disease, which the world no less witnessed for itself during the debate. See, this is the problem for Liberalism’s disciples. Rather than think for themselves and draw their own conclusions, however glaringly obvious, they blindly, faithfully, accept what their cult leaders tell them. Joe’s fine. Carry on. Then, later, the truth emerges, as it always does and always will, despite the cult’s best efforts to keep it buried, mind you, and disciples end up looking like fools. One would think them to be humiliated and subsequently enraged at their leaders, but they are not. Respectful and servile, they are eternally forgiving. Eternally. 

Anyway, imagine a huge crowd of concert goers waiting excitedly for the featured band. The lights go out; the hall darkens, pitch black. After a loud speaker voice blares the band’s introduction, the stage lights suddenly blast on. And … 

The stage is empty, completely vacant. 

Shortly, concert goers begin looking around at each other, confused.  

What’s happening? Are we being punked?   

This is precisely how the American people feel—all but liberal voters, that is—watching the ascendancy and continuation of the Biden presidency, and the non-reaction to Biden’s glaringly obvious cognitive illness by a political party and nearly an entire national news media. The deception is more than just absurd and risible.  

It verifies deep, intentional political corruption and criminality.  

It’s redundant, but let’s reestablish it anyway: all in the aforementioned political party and national news media know Biden is sick. Yet, corruptly and criminally, they are attempting to conceal the illness from the American public to win an election for their preferred presidential candidate.  

Now, if that sounds distinctly like evil communism, congratulations.  

You’re not a mindless, servile liberal voter. 

Conservative pundits suggest Biden’s handlers accepted the early debate date in June as a test. If Biden couldn’t cut the cognitive mustard and performed poorly during the debate, then he would be replaced by democrat hierarchy. But then, replaced with whom? The pundits then confess Kamala Harris is despised, polling even worse than Biden, who is at historic polling lows himself. Then they begin with the list of likely candidates—Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Gavin Newsom. Missing in their analysis, however, is Obama’s treasonous Russian collusion plot. It is as if the historic crime never occurred, as if it has no bearing on the current political circumstances. Inexplicably, the issue is neglected, when it should be the guiding event, the cornerstone, of conservative analysis. Why? 

Because concealing the plot has been the establishment’s sole mission for the last eight years. 

Avoiding exposure has guided their every lawless decision and communist ploy along the way. Simply, the conspirators don’t want to get caught, and the news media wants to help them avoid it. To that, can you imagine what it would mean to the Democrat Party and liberalism were its leaders caught in a treasonous plot? One that involved the FBI and CIA and national news media, no less? Can you imagine the fallout were such a heinous betrayal proven and made thoroughly public? 

It would be ruinous. 

And the plot has been proven and made public, incidentally. Aided by their establishment conspirators, the traitors are merely working to keep the proof from being thoroughly publicly known, acknowledged, accepted, and adjudicated. 

For their certain ruination, a co-conspirator with skin in the game, Joe Biden, had to be president in 2020, and must be again in 2024. That’s why the conspirators and their establishment accomplices are ignoring Biden’s glaring cognitive disability and exploiting him. If they acknowledge his ailment publicly, the chance of a Biden second term is dead and Trump is president. The same Trump the establishment has tried to destroy for the last eight years in nearly every way possible to prevent their criminal exposure. The same Trump who uncovered their treasonous plot in his first term, who can expose them, who is now righteously retributive, and who has the wind of 74 million enraged and retribution-minded American patriots in his sails. 

That’s what the urgent and unprecedented Mara-A-Lago raid was all about, incidentally. Regarding their coup, the traitors needed to ascertain the evidence Trump took with him, and to locate, confiscate, and destroy it.  

After its raid on Trump’s estate, the FBI said they had found classified files that Trump had illegally taken from the White House. Bearing “Top Secret” cover sheets, the FBI had arrayed the files on the floor, photographed them, and shared the pictures with the public. It turns out, the FBI had themselves stapled the “Top Secret” cover sheets to the files. Originally, Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team had said the boxes of evidence from the raid were in their original condition from when they were found. In a court brief later, however, they admitted the boxes were altered or manipulated, i.e. with the “Top Secret” cover sheets.  

In other words, the FBI stapled the otherwise unmarked files with “Top Secret” cover sheets for public effect.  

Now, why would the FBI be interested in enhancing evidence for public persuasion? Did the agency do the same for the classified evidence they found at Joe Biden’s residence?  

No. And why not?  

Well, as Obama’s VP was Joe Biden a co-conspirator in Obama’s Russian collusion plot? 

How about the FBI? Were they co-conspirators? 

Make sense now?  

They call it motive. 

 It is all to say this, folks: communist traitors are among us and the political situation is currently grave.  

The conspirators’ lives—and the establishment’s life, too—literally hang in the balance. Just as the all concerned know Biden is cognitively ailing, they are clearly aware, per the raid, that Trump knows what they did, that he has the documentation, and that, as a second-term president he can expose and destroy them. 

So, accepting the early debate date. Conservative pundits say it was a test for Biden. But why couldn’t it be that Biden’s handlers took the early date because they understand the rapidity of Biden’s cognitive decline, and were afraid to wait?  Remember, they all know he is sick; they all know the prognosis, which lacks, shall we say, dependable longevity. If Biden were to deteriorate, handlers could later make an excuse, i.e. “The president refuses to debate a convicted felon.” For Biden’s predictable decline, the handlers know they must debate now, early. Better to do it now while the president is still somewhat cognitively able. Because who knows what optical nightmare the future might bring—optics the handlers can later excuse and conceal, and a future they can avoid. 

The point is the conservative punditry is on the wrong intellectual path. The right path is running establishment behavior of the last eight years through Obama’s treasonous Russian collusion plot. Because protecting the traitors, namely Obama, as well as liberalism and their unholy establishment, has been the impetus for every establishment behavior and ploy of the last eight years. Everything they have done and will do was/is aimed at concealing their treasonous crime. Actually, the conspirators have been doing two things during the past eight years: (a) trying to conceal their treasonous crime, and (b) trying to complete the objective of their treasonous crime: their communist coup. Had Clinton won in 2016, none would be the wiser. Her losing, however, they are now exposed and committed. All hands on establishment deck, there is no turning back. 

 Hence, these “handlers” of Biden’s. Who are they? If Biden’s mind is gone, and it’s clear it is, who is making decisions for the nation? The handlers? And are they not predominantly Obama’s people? And given Biden’s co-conspirator status, would not Biden employ Obama’s people? Would not Obama ensure that Biden employ his personnel? Facing the same criminal fate, have they not ensured it? 

Ignoring tradition, why did Barrack Obama remain in Washington all these many years after his presidency? Pre-Biden’s critical debate with Trump, why were Obama and Clinton, the Democrat Party’s leaders, taking over the reins of the Biden campaign? Obama and Clinton know full well that Biden is cognitively impaired, not to mention a corrupt fool. So why don’t they just come out and confess his illness and begin replacement procedures? He’s sick and can’t do the job is all they have to say, which is no less obvious. Why defy what everyone can now, post-debate, see for themselves? Why keep pretending Biden is healthy and continuing his candidacy?  

Why? Because Obama and Clinton committed treason, with Biden. And because all need a fellow conspirator in the White House to control their fate. 

What I mean is, anyone other than a co-conspirator occupying the White House imperils the traitors. With an outsider, the conspirators lose control of their fate, lose control of the agencies and personnel with whom they can control their fate. With no skin in the game, the outsider has the power and authority and leverage, not the conspirators. The outsider, even a fellow liberal democrat, can turn on the conspirators. After all, the outsider didn’t commit treason. The conspirators did, and they can’t risk their control over staff and agency appointments, and their ability to protect themselves, which has been the day-to-day objective since their fateful defeat in November, 2016. 

Agree with the outcome of the 2020 election or not, the American people supposedly chose a president to run their nation’s affairs. His mind clearly and incontrovertibly gone, Joe Biden cannot be running the country. Someone else must be making the decisions, or perhaps a group, a shadow government. One thing is crystal clear, it’s neither Biden nor the people’s choice.  

As to who is running the country, it should be evident.  

It all began with President Barrack Obama. 

— 

Vice President Biden and his family were traveling the world selling the Biden “brand” and collecting money from prominent dignitaries of other nations to enrich the family. Hillary Clinton was involved in not only a phony dossier and treasonous Russian collusion plot, but in a classified documents crime, an illegal server crime, deleting subpoenaed emails crime and, finally, smashing her cellphones with a hammer to conceal evidence of all these crimes, and surely the evidence of even more crime.  

Who was president during all this Biden family and Clinton crime? 

Barrack Obama.  

Yet, the establishment refuses to not only investigate his role, but to even mention his name. The President of the United States, the boss. The person who controls the FBI, CIA, and the Department of Justice. The person with all the power and ultimate responsibility during all of this historic malfeasance. Why, he isn’t connected to any of it.  

How is that? How the hell is that? 

How is it that all this flagrant and extraordinary crime is occurring under Obama’s command, and none of it gets connected to him? How is it that an entire national news media, save Fox News, doesn’t want to make this most basic of logical connections?  

Though it was only Fox News investigating and reporting on all this Obama era corruption and crime, the FBI took a public hit. The CIA a took a hit. Hillary Clinton took a hit. Her Perkins, Coie law firm took a hit. The Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, took a hit. All the collusion conspirators: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strozk, Lisa Page, Bruce and Nellie Ohr—they and many more all took a public hit. Biden and his family took a hit. Even the corrupt establishment news media took a hit.  

Conspirator upon conspirator was dragged to the public square and exposed for their treasonous crime. Yet the conspiracy’s leader, the person in charge, the person controlling and directing the agencies and the people involved, he hardly has his name mentioned and has thus far been given a pass.  

Why, it’s as if he was never president! 

It seems the predominant news media question would be: what was President Obama’s role in all this? How did he not know? How did his FBI, CIA, DOJ, and National Intelligence Director not know all this corruption and crime were going on? That (a) there was a Russian collusion conspiracy afoot within the president’s orbit, and (b) not warn him about it? We certainly know now the conspiracy occurred. We know it involved the upper echelons of the FBI and CIA, too, and officials in Obama’s White House. So, even if the FBI and CIA were unaware of the conspiracy and caught flatfooted, they know now. Where are the indictments? The disciplinary measures? Where is the Department of Justice, for that matter? The news media? 

Of course, they have all been absent since Special Counsel Robert Mueller finally declared there was no evidence of collusion between Trump and Putin, which leaves but one obvious conclusion: the FBI, CIA, DOJ, and news media were involved in the conspiracy, too, were co-conspirators. Which, of course, is why they have been absent on every front—discovery, investigation, adjudication, punishment—for the last eight years.  

And to be clear, this is Obama’s FBI, CIA, and DOJ. His hand-selected personnel, er, conspirators. 

Anyone wanting to do the laziest of intellectual work knows that Obama is the head of the snake in all this. Regarding the political upheaval of the last eight years, since Donald Trump was elected president, Obama is the lone, responsible figure. He’s the only one who could direct everything that happened: utilizing Clinton’s phony dossier, spying on the Trump campaign, unmasking people in the Trump campaign, lying to FISA courts and getting warrants, the phony Mueller investigation and framing people in the Trump campaign. Otherwise, America’s intelligence and law enforcement agencies have gone rogue.  

And given their high-tech spying tools, and their subsequent ability to blackmail and frame whomever they desire, how frightening is that idea? 

Hillary Clinton and the DNC (Democrat National Committee) purchased the phony Steele Dossier from Christopher Steele, perhaps commissioned it, and brought it to Obama via her Perkins, Coie attorneys. Why did Clinton bring the dossier to Obama?  

Because she didn’t have the power of the presidency, couldn’t command the FBI and CIA to procure FISA warrants and initiate spying. The President of the United States, Barack Obama, had that power and command.  

He and his family selling the Biden brand to the world, Joe Biden doesn’t have any power or command, either. The world wasn’t paying for his influence, wasn’t sending the Biden Family cashier’s checks for his juice. Biden doesn’t have any juice. The person the world’s investors wanted to influence, the person with the actual juice to get things done, is the Commander In Chief: Barrack Obama. 

 Obama is the kingpin, the conspiratorial Godfather handing down orders. In the treasonous conspiracy car, he is the engine. Without him, the whole operation is just lifeless, rusting metal. Obama puts everything into motion, and the plan he set in motion in 2016 was an attempted communist coup against American democracy and the American people. Wherein he tried to not only install his choice, Hillary Clinton, into the Oval Office, but employed America’s FBI and CIA in the crime. As for transgressions, this is the worst, the most unforgivable, ranking right up there with murder. I don’t know how one emphasizes the gravity of the crime and situation so that it arouses the attention and concern of a citizenry.  

But this is an attempted communist coup in real time.  

Obama and his administrative co-conspirators tried to destroy freedom, to end it, to enslave a nation. Clinton losing the 2016 election, however, he and his co-conspirators not only failed. Their coup was exposed, which was unmistakably strategic and planned. 

 For example, Obama’s FBI director, James Comey, refused to prosecute Clinton for all her many crimes. Why? Because Clinton, a fellow communist, was to be coronated as the next President of the United States per the boss’s, Obama’s, orders, and was to complete Obama’s communist objectives. Trump’s victory, however, thwarted the plot and threw the conspirators into sheer panic. Per presidential authority, Trump would be able to then expose Obama’s coup. Hence, the Russian collusion fraud and the intentionally long-winded Mueller investigation, meant to distract, delay, and prevent the conspirators’ criminal exposure. Hence, the legal assault on Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, too, Trump’s new national security advisor, who, via his military and intelligence acumen and public distaste for Obama, would not only know where to find all the coup evidence, but would relish exposing Obama and his treasonous plot.  

Needing to buy time, the conspirators made Trump the Russian collusion criminal, instead.  

Or rather, Obama made Trump the Russian collusion criminal. 

And here we are eight years later, the conspirators still desperately trying to survive and becoming increasingly more desperate. So desperate, in fact, that they would not only exploit a senile old man, but try to convince a now acutely aware citizenry that he isn’t senile—an impossible sell now given Biden’s debate debacle.  

Thus, imagine the terror and consequent panic among the conspirators. It is vital that they have Biden in the White House. But then Biden is an alarming, undeniable cognitive mess during the debate, which the whole world saw and finally acknowledged. Along with conservatives and republicans, even some democrats and former news media allies are now calling for Biden to step down, which the conspirators simply cannot abide. Now they must get a president with exposed and irrefutable dementia to the second term finish line, to prevent an angry and surging candidate they have tried to unsuccessfully destroy from exposing not only their treasonous crimes, but the political bias, corruption, and treachery of their complicit establishment. 

For the scenario, here’s a descriptive phrase: an injured and cornered animal. 

All their schemes and tricks having failed for the last eight years, the latest now stammering and staring thousand-yard-like during public debates. The term crisis doesn’t begin to describe matters for the conspirators. Realize that if Obama is exposed, the whole treasonous plot blows up, which is precisely why his role has never been explored nor his name mentioned. If the conspiracy’s roots are traced to Obama, then the political upheaval of the last eight years not only makes complete sense. The coup is confirmed and verified—is everything Fox News and conservatives said it was from the beginning.  

A “fake news” news media is then confirmed, too. The nation’s news media not only chose sides with a political party, the Democrat Party, and shilled on its behalf. They helped Obama execute and conceal his treasonous crime. Then, they knowingly ushered a senile old man into the White House and maintained his presidency for four years—and are attempting to ensure four more.  

Remember: they know. They all know, and are clearly committed. 

Just like every facet of the establishment knows Biden is senile, they all know President Obama committed treason in 2016, too. They know Clinton paid for the dossier, that her campaign manager said she signed off on the plot. They know the 2020 election was an electoral fraud, and why. They know that the laptop is authentic, that Hunter Biden is guilty, and that the Biden Family was selling out the country. They know 51 former intelligence officials knowingly lied about the laptop’s origins to help Biden win. They know Nancy Pelosi was responsible for January 6^th security, that the congressional committee investigating the event lied and destroyed evidence to destroy Trump. They know all the criminal cases against Trump are manufactured frauds, and why.  

They know it all, and they know why. 

Here’s what else they know: with Biden’s illness exposed, their criminal exposure is imminent.  

Hence, the acts of panic and desperation, i.e. pretending a senile presidential candidate isn’t senile. And in that, it is impossible to expose themselves any more vividly and thoroughly. 

For the conspirators to survive, Biden must not only remain their candidate, but win. The problem is the public’s now comprehensive awareness of their ailing candidate, and the panic within the establishment. Post-debate, the news media is frightened and flailing because the world saw for itself what they had been trying to hide. Sensing doom, and worse, personal humiliation, the weakest members are terrified. They are calling for Biden to step aside for another democrat candidate, are effectively crying out to the conspirators to do something, anything!, to prevent their exposure and humiliation, too.  

The proverbial wheels coming off the corrupt and criminal and senile establishment bus, it is difficult for the conspirators to keep the windows up and all flailing hands and arms inside.  

Believing Obama and his fellow conspirators calm and cool in all this is utter foolishness. They are in deep trouble, and know it. In fact, their entire liberal establishment is in trouble, is on the brink of ruinous devastation. Biden’s senility now confirmed and undeniable, they know the questions are not only imminent, but plenteous. Whose idea was it to pull out of Afghanistan? Who’s making the military decisions? Who made the economic decisions that have affected the lives of Americans so punitively? Who’s behind all this green energy legislation? Who made the decisions regarding the Ukraine war? Regarding Israel and Palestine? Who’s responsible for the border and immigration decisions, the illegal invasion plaguing the nation?

Biden incapacitated for the last four years, somebody needs to start providing answers, and now!  

And there is this intriguing query: is it really surprising that Biden’s political agenda is precisely Obama’s political agenda? Or, perhaps it’s the other way around. 

Biden’s exposed illness presents all sorts of catastrophic problems for the conspirators. Even so, it doesn’t matter how sick Biden gets or how absurd the notion of Biden support becomes. A co-conspirator, Biden must remain in the race and emerge victorious.  

That’s key for the traitors. Absolutely vital.  

It means: even if plucking pretend butterflies from the air in a wheelchair, Biden will still be the democrat candidate in November. He must be, which sets the stage for some compelling intrigue in the meantime. After Biden’s catastrophic, coming out debate party, even the liberal long knives came out for Biden. Hollywood freaked out. So did major donors, and even some prominent news media figures and democrats. The New York Times editorial board even called Biden’s continued candidacy a “reckless gamble.” Suddenly, the whole world was awake and opposing Biden’s candidacy, and demanding he step aside. 

The conspirators’ response to the calls?  

Via “President” Biden: “Absolutely not.”  

To provide the vital and impending ruse of the next four months much needed support, the conspirators called the nation’s democrat governors to the White House for an urgent meeting. Biden on his “A” game during the meeting apparently, select governors rushed to the media microphones after. Their unified message was clear:  

“The president is in it to win it.” 

In other words, don’t believe your lying eyes and ears, America. Joe Biden is perfectly healthy and capable. 

Four months of this ridiculous charade will be incredibly intriguing.

In a list of all the worst things that could happen to upend a presidential campaign, cognitive disease is the worst, just behind death. In Biden’s case, the traitors are clearly breezing right past that problem, which demonstrates the vital necessity of a co-conspirator in the White House, and that nothing will keep Biden from being the candidate in November. Of course, the conspirators all recognize the formidability of that idea now, now that Biden’s senility has been publicly confirmed, which then renders an honest and fair election even more out of the question for the conspirators.   

Meaning: if you think the cheating was bad in the 2020 election. Brace yourself, Effy. 

Cornered and desperate, the treasonous criminals hemmed themselves in with a cognitively ailing Biden in 2020, and now his mind is nearly gone. They tried to hide the illness, with establishment assistance, but now it is fully recognizable and undeniable. They can’t turn to Kamala Harris because she’s not an original conspirator with skin in the game. As for Hillary Clinton, she is damaged and completely unlikable goods. Michelle Obama is out, too, because her husband is in enough trouble as it is and, as president, she would be forced lie, conceal, and become a conspirator herself. California governor, Gavin Newsom, is out. Because, in what would be a total shock to him, his own state is a failing mess, and he’s smarmy and repulsive. 

Of course, the whole replacement idea is a waste of time and words, because Obama and his fellow conspirators, to include Biden, need Biden in the White House. He is the last line of defense between Donald Trump, a just legal system, and their exposure and punishment. For the conspirators, Biden is quite literally a life and death necessity. So, they are going to continue to lie about Biden’s illness, and continue to justify a Biden presidency. However frail and crumbling case by case, they are going to continue their attempts to take Trump out legally via the courts. The news media and democrat political pundits are going to whine and moan and complain about their candidate, Biden, and demand that democrats make a change. Liberal voters will sit stunned and speechless, because their political gods and cult leaders are clearly lying to their faces, and they know it, and don’t know what to do.  

Finally, there will be all this liberal dysfunction for the next four months over Biden’s candidacy, which will be occurring for one reason and one reason only:  

Obama and his conspirators need a Biden presidency to protect themselves. 

And then, amazingly, after all the in-house bickering and chaos over Biden’s candidacy for four months, the entire, evil liberal cult will accept the fraud and ultimately coalesce behind their senile candidate. Forget their previous arguments and statements and demands regarding Biden’s cognitive unviability. He is now their man! Healthy and ready to serve!  

Never better, he’s the best version of Joe Biden ever! 

And yes. Liberals are this utterly plastic and shameless. 

So, get ready for the polls that show Biden, inexplicably, in a neck and neck race with Donald Trump, because that is the race the conspirators must have. They need a tight race to make cheating less obvious. The further Biden is behind, the harder it is to legitimize and justify a Biden victory—which is already hard enough given the public witness to his senility.  

Ultimately, the fact is this: Obama is a communist traitor. Only when that fact is exposed does all this plasticity and shamelessness end. Until then, it’s all just, run of the mill political drama that protects Obama, his conspiracy, and his fellow conspirators. 

 The chaotic events of the last eight years are not regular politics. There is a reason all the upheaval occurred, and it isn’t Donald Trump. It is for a treasonous conspiratorial crime perpetuated by Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, America’s own FBI and CIA, a deep state, and a national news media. More pointedly, it’s because of a bunch of liberal democrats, rather, a bunch of communists, wanted to quietly loose America from its foundational mooring of freedom and democracy, and drag it into the deep, dark waters of communism, sans anyone knowing and fighting.  

Caught in the act, their exposure and punishment are now finally at stake. To assess what they might be capable of in coming days, realize this: 

Their destiny and lives are dependent upon a senile co-conspirator. 

*This article contains opinion. Excellent opinion.

©JMW 7/2024 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

“Our immigration system is broken,” a republican acquaintance insisted. I couldn’t believe my ears, how intellectually incurious and stunted an intelligent, accomplished person could be. This is what a liberal pretending to be a republican looks and sounds like. The liberal talking point is “a broken immigration system,” and these “republicans” repeat the phrase merely because it’s the popular establishment position—the establishment being liberal, of course.  

That’s the power of media, of liberal media, of the mainstream media. It sets the ideological course, and that’s the “popular” opinion and position, rendering all other opinion inferior and unpopular. 

Evaluating the immigration problem and thinking for themselves is out of the question for these “republicans.” Were they to do so, they’d come to an opposing position, to my position. But doing so would not only contradict popular opinion. Worse, it would invite stinging ridicule and accusation, which is simply intolerable.  

Like their liberal kinfolk, these “republicans” worry about what people think and say about them. They don’t like the conservative label, but haven’t the courage to be open, unapologetic liberals, either, an affiliation deemed equally unsavory. So, they call themselves “republicans” but espouse popular liberal orthodoxy. Doctrine such as: “our immigration system is broken.” It’s shady and gutless, but just what you’d expect from liberals, in republican clothing or otherwise. 

 In question is the popular ideological position. Is America’s immigration system really broken? 

Saying the immigration system is broken is like saying, “This war is lost.” As the late Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid—may he writhe in eternal torment in hell’s hottest corner—publicly proclaimed in 2007 regarding the ongoing Iraq War. Reid, the same liberal who knowingly lied about presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s unpaid taxes before the 2012 presidential election. Asked about the intentional deceit before his death, Reid said simply, “He didn’t win, did he?” Meaning Romney. And Romney, a “republican” of this shady and gutless variety, still aligns with his liberal accusers and tormentors. 

Reid was an evil human being; may he eternally writhe. Nevertheless, that’s what he said, that the Iraq War was lost, and America was defeated. To that, and to these liberals in republican clothing and their open and unapologetic liberal kin, this question: how can any war ever be lost by a country with an atomic arsenal?  

One word: Hiroshima.   

The point is no war is ever lost. Same as no immigration system is ever “broken.” To suggest otherwise in either case is far beyond utter nonsense.  

Immigration control is simple: build a wall, lockdown the borders with law enforcement and/or military, and man the watchtowers at each and every point of vulnerability. Immigration control isn’t a matter of walls, personnel, and armament, which America and virtually every nation has and can easily and immediately put into place. It’s a matter of political will, which we know to be implicitly true for one, Donald Trump. 

Pre-Trump, the immigration and border control issues were, for decades, paid mere lip service by political leadership, democrat and republican alike. Take Hillary Clinton, for example:  

“Illegals should be sent back … we’ve got to do more [about border security] … we have to send a clear message: just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay.” 

And the late California Senator, Diane Feinstein:  

“I think we can enforce our borders; I think we should enforce our borders. To have a situation where 40% of the babies born on Medicaid in California today are born of illegal immigrants creates a very real problem for [California], which is in deficit. And [to] have 17% of our prison population, at a cost of $300 million a year, be illegal immigrants who come here and commit felonies? That’s not what this nation is all about.”—and these remarks were made decades ago. 

And Barrack Obama: 

“All of us take offense to anyone who reaps the rewards of living in America without taking on the responsibilities of living in America … We’re also a nation of laws. [Illegals] broke our immigration laws, and I believe that they must be held accountable, especially those who may be dangerous.” 

For appearances, congress funded a wall in 2006, the Secure Fence Act, but never built it. Never addressed all this faux concern, either: “illegals and their children getting to stay;” or imprisoned illegals who “come here and commit felonies” at taxpayer expense; or them “reaping the rewards of America without taking on the responsibility.”  

Addressing the issues, leaders were clearly aware of them. So, why were the concerns never physically addressed and the wall never built?  

Because it was all lip service in servitude to this fact: leaders wanted open borders and illegal immigration.  

If they didn’t want it, they would stop it, which is ridiculously simple and easily done.  

America’s illegal population was growing for decades, to the point no one could really say how many illegals were in the country. Nobody knew and nobody cared because the result was … desired. Leadership wanted to change the country’s racial dynamics from predominantly white, God-fearing, Christian, pro-flag, pro-constitution, pro-gun, and pro-America loving patriot to something a little more brown, desperate, malleable, dependent, and more amenable to enslavement. Transformation was clearly the plan because, for decades, nobody did anything to rectify the problem.  

Enter Donald Trump … 

Trump was resolute about ending illegal immigration and protecting Americans, and all witnessed how the establishment felt about that. With full establishment might, liberals fought his security initiatives tooth and nail. They mocked Trump, claimed walls wouldn’t work, delayed, withheld funding—all while executing a treasonous plot to dispense with his presidency, incidentally. It all draws a very simple, clear, and incontrovertible conclusion: American leadership was ever serious about stopping illegal immigration. In fact, it was the direct opposite. 

Per a criminal incident or negative data involving illegals, the citizenry would become angry about the lawless invasion, insecurity, and expense. Leaders would then address the matter publicly just to appear they were aware and doing something about it. The public anger would eventually dissipate, and the issue would be intentionally shelved. Until anger arose again, where it was then likewise mollified, and the issue shelved again.  

In other words, there was no intention of solving the immigration problem. Hence, the incontrovertible fact:  

America’s immigration system isn’t “broken.” It’s immigration laws simply aren’t being enforced. That’s it; that’s all—which must be intentional because the solution is insanely simple. 

Anybody could fix this problem if they really wanted to. What do people do when they want a place for their dog to run and play securely outside? They go to the hardware store, purchase some lumber and nails, and erect a fence. Problem solved. Likewise, what do people do when they want to stop illegals from infiltrating their nation? They make the initiative a priority and marshal all law enforcement and the military to the task—which is precisely what Donald Trump did and was despised by America’s leadership class for doing. 

Now, why would they despise him for it? They’d been complaining about illegal immigration for decades, even passed a bill to build a wall. “We have to do more,” Clinton said. “We’re a nation of laws,” Obama lashed, and illegals “broke those laws.” Leaders clearly recognized the lawlessness, financial injustice, and national peril. So why then oppose Trump’s immigration initiatives so vehemently and work so hard to defeat them? 

Because leadership wanted illegal immigration all along! 

There is no other conclusion. 

It simply took Trump to expose that fact. In fact, it took Trump to expose a lot of nefarious facts about America’s leadership class, which is precisely why he is the establishment’s—republicans and democrats alike—Enemy Number One.  

Immigration systems don’t break, and aren’t broken. That’s a ruse to facilitate desired and transformative illegal immigration, and ultimately an attack on the nation. And if a government facilitates an attack on its own nation, with whom is it then aligned?  

The enemy?  
Or the people it’s paid to serve and protect? 

Something is broken, alright. And it’s not an immigration system. 

©JMW 12/23 
All Rights Reserved 

JMWs latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside. 

Palestinian Muslims attack Jews in their Israeli homes—beheading infants and children, raping young girls, and slaughtering the elderly—and “President” Joe Biden is concerned about Islamophobia and rising hatred for Muslims. It’s beyond absurd, of course, given the aggressors. But why would Muslim well-being be Biden’s concern? 

Biden couldn’t care less about Muslims. Just like he doesn’t care about American auto workers, that he doesn’t work for. That’s what he barked—“I don’t work for you!”— to a group of hard hatted, blue collar union men, who nonetheless pay Biden’s salary. Biden can run his aggressive, intimidating mouth at the auto worker because he knows there will be a swarm of security come to his rescue, and because he knows the auto worker understands the law doesn’t favor him in a physical altercation with an elected official. 

Interestingly, a Google search of the incident returns, “Fact Check: did Biden say I don’t work for you to an American auto worker? False.” False? 

… and yet there’s Biden on video, before everyone’s very eyes and ears, saying precisely that. 

This “Fact Check” system doesn’t seem to be functioning properly.  

Biden couldn’t care less about Muslims, just like he doesn’t care about the Indians who work at 7/11 and Dunkin’ Donuts in Delaware, or anywhere else in the nation. Just like he doesn’t care about African Americans, readily lynching them high-tech-style to prevent seating them on the supreme court. Just like he doesn’t care about the constitution and rule of law, and about selling out his country to the highest international bidder via the Biden Family Crime Syndicate.  

Like every liberal, Joe Biden cares about Joe Biden, and definitely not Muslims. So, if Islamophobia and rising Muslim hatred aren’t Joe Biden concerns or policies, then, whose are they?  

Muslim well-being is a Barack Obama concern and policy—the Hand of the Incapacitated King.  

Biden’s policies don’t “mirror” Obama’s policies; they are Obama policies, right down to Muslim well-being and the Muslim religion’s proliferation. All his corrupt personnel still ensconced in the White House, along with his treasonous collusion co-conspirators in the FBI, CIA, and DOJ. Obama is enjoying an illegal third term. And we’re fully aware of his Islamic ties: publicly, and accidentally, professing his Muslim faith to George Stephanopoulos at ABC News; keeping company with outspoken and ferocious antisemite, Louis Farrakhan, a picture of the cavorting pair intentionally concealed for years for fear it might cost Obama the 2008 election.  

Despite what he says, despite the image he portrays, Obama is an antisemite—behavior never lies. He’s what Muslims have been all along, since Malcolm X and all the rest: despisers of Jews and the Jewish nation, and at their core, Marxist communists. Simply, Obama and his contemporary Muslim brothers and sisters are the latest iteration of Naziism—only with different skin color and brown eyes, instead of Aryan blue. And staunch Jewish liberals are not only noticing, but taking issue. 

Comedian Bill Maher, for example, accused Obama of pushing a moral equivalency—Obama suggesting in public remarks that Hamas and Israel were both to blame, and that no one had “clean hands.” “All of us are complicit,” Obama said, which “disappointed” Maher. And after logically filleting Obama, Maher told him, “So, enough with the moral equivalencies.” Maher railed against journalists, too, 750 having signed an open letter urging newsrooms to embrace terms like “apartheid” and “genocide” to describe Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.  

Maher: “They couldn’t be more pro-[terrorist].” Furthermore, how do these journalists characterize an unprovoked, murderous Muslim attack on infants, children, young girls, and the elderly? 

Harvard Law professor emeritus, Alan Dershowitz, said his relationship with Obama is “over” and that he’s never talking to him again. “I think he always had a deep hatred of Israel [of Jews, to be clear] in his heart,” Dershowitz said. “He hid it very well. He called me to the Oval Office, and he said to me, ‘Alan, you’ve known me for a long time. You know I have Israel’s back.’ I didn’t realize he meant to paint a target on it. He’s never been supportive of Israel. And finally, his true feelings have come out now that he’s no longer president and doesn’t have to be elected. He has contributed enormously to the problem because he is respected among young people. And if he says the occupation is unbearable and that anything can be done to stop it, he is encouraging people to engage in their antisemitic, anti-Israel and anti-American attitudes. He should be ashamed of himself. He should apologize, but he won’t.” 

To clearly and accurately paraphrase Dershowitz: Obama is a liar, is a ravenous, murderous Muslim wolf in sheep’s clothing. And the evidence clearly demonstrates that it’s not only true, but okay to say. 

Lesson: apparently, the only thing that inspires Jewish revolt in the Liberalism/Muslim cult is the rising aroma of world hatred for Jews and the potential for more gas chamber construction. Clearly, and understandably, liberal Jews value their own skin more than the cult. 

These Obama Muslims tell us not to be afraid, that they are good, peaceful Muslims, as opposed to these terrorist sorts. So, given what this Muslim terrorist faction did to the Jews on October 7^th, where is Obama’s defense of “good” Muslims and his scathing rebuke and renunciation of this so-called separate terrorist faction? There has been neither. Instead, Obama says what he must, that, while what these Muslims did to Israelis is horrific, the Jews need to now pursue peace and a two-state solution, both of which Israel has already done, and clearly to no avail. 

Isn’t it interesting how Muslims win in Obama’s prescription, and Israel loses? Wonder if that means anything? 

Incidentally, this is how Muslims end you: kill the enemy off thousands at time via a brutal attack, demand a ceasefire and peace talks after to prevent retribution. Then kill thousands more later and demand another ceasefire and round of peace talks. Until eventually, there is no enemy left. 

Mission complete! Jews cease to exist, and the Muslim Nation is at full strength, and ready to conquer more lands and people.

Defending yourself and aggressively killing Muslims in return?  

Why, it’s not only a disproportionate response and injustice, but inhuman. 

Realize that evil’s best, most effective weapon is simple accusation, specifically public accusation. Evil does whatever it wants, and then accuses you when you righteously complain and fight back. It is an extremely effective tactic merely because people are deathly afraid of public criticism and scorn.  

Well, when the criticism and scorn occur, here’s a verbal tool for that—to be used with authority and an air of impending war: 

F— you. All of you. 

Evil is a massive con, a cult populated by the pathetic. It/they should be treated accordingly. 

Why should anyone of reputation and righteousness care about the criticisms of corrupt, immoral, self-important frauds? 

As president, Obama had no problem criticizing and snubbing Israel’s new prime minister. The Jewish nation saw fit to democratically elect Binyamin Netanyahu, and Obama not only refused to call and congratulate him—Netanyahu and Israel longstanding American allies, no less. Obama criticized the new prime minister, the people’s choice. Why the snub and criticism? 

Because Obama is a Jew-despising Muslim. Actually, it’s more pointed than that. Obama is a conservative Jew-despising Muslim.  

After Netanyahu’s election, Israeli journalist, Aluf Benn, a liberal Jew, complained that Netanyahu deployed the politics of fear in his victory, and claimed the tactic worked like magic: 

“Blaming a cabal of ‘foreign money,’ the Obama administration, and a hostile media for ‘aiming at ousting him and electing a leftist government relying on Arabs,’ Netanyahu appealed to the primal fear of his political base.” 

Only, Netanyahu was right, and Israelis should have been primally afraid. Because Obama was trying to oust Netanyahu and to accomplish an Israeli government of Arab Muslims—the enemy from within, like liberals to America. Meanwhile, Obama was arranging nuclear weapons for Iran, too, Israel’s primary, dedicated, and fiercest Muslim enemy, who no less prays and chants for Israel’s death daily. 

Gee, what are the implications in this scenario? 

Here’s one: Obama is a Jew-despising Muslim who wants to rid the world of Israel and the Jews, or to at least enslave them.

The fact, abundantly clear, is there’s no difference between “terrorist” Muslims and Obama brand Muslims. Towards the Jews, all have the same hatred and goal. Hence, there’s (a) the cult’s political face and (b) its henchmen. Or rather, there’s Vito Corleone and Luca Brasi. One to provide legitimacy and assurances to the public, the other to do that one’s bloody, evil bidding, say, in Israeli homes on October 7^th. 

So, proof that the Hand of the Incapacitated King is actually the king, Islamophobia and the rising hatred for Muslims are Barack Obama’s concerns, and political efforts to protect and proliferate the cult, his policies. He’s worried about a world backlash against the Nation of Islam, a justifiable concern given the October 7^th brutality of his cult’s henchmen, not to exclude 9/11 and the countless other Muslim atrocities around the world. Inhuman religious brutality Obama doesn’t condemn in his heart, mind you, but only publicly. Because he wants the same thing, while maintaining this phony ideological dividing line between “good” and terrorist Muslims for appearances and cover.  

But there is no dividing line, and the reassurances of Muslim “goodness” are solely for the infidels.  

Muslims know the truth. Per Obama’s behavior—snubbing and criticizing Netanyahu, arranging nuclear weapons for Iran, getting angry at Trump for declaring Jerusalem Israel’s capital and confirming the Jewish nation—the cult understands what Obama is saying, and why. It’s necessary political speak, and cover.  

Allying with the Jews, those stinking pigs—nothing insults and infuriates Muslims more.  

The Muslim quest isn’t peace. All who defy the Muslim religion and Allah are infidels worthy of death, and anyone who doesn’t convert deserves the sentence. Clearly, the Muslim agenda is world domination. And to accomplish the mission, they’re concealing the fact that terrorists Muslims and “good” Muslims, these Obama-brand Muslims, are really one and the same.  

In the miniseries, Band of Brothers, after the Nazis surrendered and were walking, in column, defeatedly down a local highway. A wearied and angry American soldier took occasion to righteously rail at them: 

“You stupid kraut bastards! Dragging our asses halfway around the world. Interrupting our lives. For what?! You ignorant, servile scum! What the fuck are we doing here! Huh?!”

In other words, how could these people ever subscribe to the utter lunacy of Hitler and cause so much needless human hardship, death, and world destruction? 

Things seldom appear as we imagine them. What does an evil communist takeover of a country or the world look like anyway? It looks like politics at first, which is why an invasion of evil is so difficult to recognize. Eventually, it looks like darkness and death, a manifest wickedness all can then certify and sanction. The world heard all the Nazi and Japanese rhetoric before World War II. It saw the incremental military movements to service evil’s objective. The world knew, but it couldn’t imagine the bloody, macabre result—330,000 American citizens alone dead, many more permanently injured or maimed.  

And if evil hadn’t been defeated in these European and Pacific theaters, how different would the world look today? How differently would life be lived? 

Infinitely worse than we would ever wrongly imagine. 

The world had its respective national asses dragged halfway around the world because evil didn’t appear to be evil quickly enough, which, indeed, is hard to recognize until invading shores, collecting human remains, and digging graves. All because evil is unrecognized and politically pacified.  

Evil wants destruction, death, and slaves. This being exactly what Muslims seek, perhaps the wisest course of infidel action is embodied by a phrase: 

Early recognition and preemption. 

As Vito Corleone advised his son Michael, “Whoever comes to you with this Barzini meeting, he’s the traitor. Don’t forget that.” Joe Biden is a nearly mindless, incapacitated fool being used by someone, or rather, something else. That is the evil of our time, and don’t forget that. 

In fact, now is the time to address it.

©JMW 11/2023 

All Rights Reserved 

*This article contains opinion. Excellent opinion.

JMW’s Latest: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.