The Binding Agent: what defines liberals is what binds them 

Few people really understand liberals. Knowing them like “every square inch of my glorious naked body,” Limbaugh understood liberals. And predicting their behavior and reactions, his prescience was remarkable.  

Pundits daily explain liberals and their politics. Hence, we know liberals’ beliefs and positions on matters, corrupt and bankrupt though those beliefs and positions are. But it’s all just superficial analysis. Because it doesn’t identify the underlying aspect that motives and drives liberals.  

The underlying aspect? The aspect that both defines and binds liberals? 


Liberals won’t like the characterization, of course. But, what are people and societies bent on God, truth, and righteousness to do? Not call evil out for it hurting evil’s feelings and making it angry? And evil is not an “it,” incidentally. It’s people—individual human beings. The sorts that eliminate the police and allow evil to steal, rape, and murder. Say, like, in a democrat-run city. 

Allowing evil to reign. That always has awesome results. 

For what evil is allowed to do, people and societies, the righteous, pay the price. Evil people pay the price, too. Consumed with all that wickedness and misery, however, they just lack the intellectual wherewithal to realize it. 

Every society has it’s cross to bear. 

Well, if we’re accusing liberals of evil, then the righteous thing to do would be to prove it. And few things are easier to prove.  

Virtually every belief and position liberals assume is obliterated by basic logic. Does this bother liberals, having their arguments and beliefs destroyed in public? Does it humiliate them? Cause them rethink their positions and amend their beliefs?  


“But guns don’t fire themselves, Mr. Liberal. Perhaps we should impose stiffer penalties for the people using them in crimes, the people actually firing the guns.” 

That’s sound wisdom, of course, the likes of which makes Mr. Liberal ignores before quickly transitioning to an alternative argument: “Oh sure. White privilege much? America locks-up too many black people already! Racist!”  

The conversation devolves from there into a risible, unproductive melee simply because liberals have a deep aversion to the truth. In other words, take the truth in any situation, any truth that contradicts what liberals want to believe, and they hate it.  

That’s it. That’s the sum—the Obama administration and Hillary committed a treasonous election hoax. Hate it. Hunter Biden’s incriminating laptop isn’t Russian disinformation, but authentic. Hate it. 

And how would one classify people who bear no affinity for the truth? And not some deep, profound truth like God and spiritualism, either. But a basic observable fact, like: guns cannot fire themselves. Who willfully loathes and disregards such practical, incontrovertible truths? 

Classification: evil people. 

What would be the use of denying something so clearly true? Why ignore an obvious and undeniable fact and forge ahead in a cause that opposes the obvious fact and ultimate truth? Why continue in beliefs and positions that an obvious fact makes untenable? 

Well, because you’re evil. That’s why. Evil despises the truth, whether it’s God and spiritualism or the inability of lifeless steel to choose its targets and depress its own trigger. 

Humans use logic to get to the truth of matters. Logic works perfectly, flawlessly, every time it is employed, incidentally, and liberals employ it like everyone else. Liberals don’t pay $6-dollars a gallon for gas, for example, when Swifty Mart is running a $3-dollar promotional sale. They rise at the crack of dawn to be the first one in line at the pumps, coupon in hand. Why?  

Logic dictates.  

Or this exemplary favorite: a liberal acquaintance proclaimed she “despised” Walmart and vowed she would “never set foot” in one of their establishments. Except, Walmart was running a Christmas sale on flatscreen televisions. There to pick-up pumpkin pie filling for my wife, who did I see with a flatscreen in her cart, among other items? 

Mrs. Never Set Foot In Walmart. 

So, one cannot divorce liberals from logic. They use it like everyone else. Thus, they know the logical answers to the questions asked of them. As in this scenario:  

Liberals support abortion, or “a woman’s right to choose”—  
“A woman should be able to choose what she does with her own body,” liberals say. 
“Well, what’s she doing with her body in this instance?” 
“It’s her choice, whatever she wants.” 
“Well, what’s the choice?” 

Of course, the choice is murdering an unborn child, which is precisely where the logic undeniably leads, which liberals understand full well. Even so, they refuse to admit the conclusion and ultimate truth. Why?  

Because they hate it.  

You can’t love truth and live and believe like they want to live and believe.

Can’t do it.  

Incidentally, these are the same people who would lose their minds were they to discover someone raiding a clutch of sea turtle eggs for a tasty seaside breakfast. Yet, they can vacuum a human fetus from its uterine comforts and dispose of the remains in a medical waste dumpster. Or sell the body parts for profit. Whichever.  

Liberals follow logical sequencing just fine. The problem is what the sequencing concludes: the truth, which they simply cannot and will not acknowledge on certain occasions for what it means to their beliefs and stated position. 

So, what kind of people fiercely protect sea turtle eggs over human fetuses? What kind of people say they’d never set foot to Walmart, but then shop there for flatscreens because, like everyone else, they want the best deal and to save as much hard-earned cash as they can?   

People with a screwed-up sense of priority and hypocritical phonies. That’s who. 

Or more accurately: evil people.  

This screwed-up sense of priority and blatant hypocrisy, are these “good” things?  

Well, they are if you’re evil.  

As the esteemed Apostle Paul put it, “Thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? Thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrileage? Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God?” 

In other words, are you a hypocrite and a liar? Because these things are evil. 

And is this not what liberals do every single day? And worse? 

Of course it is. But then, when you deny the existence of both God and truth, you don’t have to concern yourself with such religious tripe. Nevertheless, let’s partially unroll the scroll and have a peek at some of their evil. Let’s see … 

Liberals rig elections.  
They commit treasonous election hoaxes.  
They obviously lie and deceive, and scheme treachery.   
They accuse people falsely, defame and destroy, too.  
They divide people.  
They abhor and ignore facts and truth.  
They’re obviously dishonest.  
They break the law, both man’s and God’s.  
They conceal these crimes.  
They are arrogant and condescending. 
They throw human fetuses in medical waste dumpsters, profit from their body parts.  
They buy flatscreens at Walmart after condemning Walmart. 
They are clearly immoral … 

The scroll has yet a thousand feet to unfurl, but how much evil is required to term people “evil?” 

Surely, we have all we need. 

In view of liberalism’s hierarchy, it being clearly a cult with gods and doctrine and followers, you could make the argument that some liberals know neither how evil their human betters are nor how much evil they support on their better’s behalf. Via their establishment tools, elite liberals lie to the American public, specifically their liberal subordinates. And if you’re a subordinate, a liberal voter who doesn’t pay attention, and who loathes Fox News and talk radio because your betters demand it. Then it’s certainly feasible you wouldn’t know how evil your human betters are, and how much evil you support on their behalf. 

So much liberal evil exposed and in the open now, however, ignorance is virtually impossible to claim. Establishment liberals have decided to take their evil public. And if that clear and present evil isn’t observed and acknowledged, then people must be approving. And the fact is, they do approve.  

Have liberals acknowledged any of their evil, and changed?  Have they said, “Gee, that Russian collusion hoax was wrong. We wronged Donald Trump, the American people, and the democratic process?” Have they confessed, “Lying about Hunter’s laptop story was corrupt and shameless?” Or the subordinates, have we heard them lament, “I’m ashamed to say I supported all this liberal evil?” 

No. They continue the evils and their cultish allegiance.  

So, if you think liberals being caught committing evil deeds is going lead to humility and remorse and a new, righteous course in life. You’re sadly mistaken. Case and point: 

After all the liberal evils of the last five years, and there are literally too many to count. And with democrats facing annihilation in the 2022 midterm elections for all these evils being no less exposed and made public. MSNBC analyst, John Heilemann, the quintessential evil liberal, had a plan to manage the potential midterm losses.  

The plan? 

“[Let’s say] Trump is a threat to our democracy [and] try to make democratic base voters scared again. [The Democrat Party] can’t motivate them on the basis of hope or their pocketbooks or any of these accomplishments. They have to scare the crap out of them.” 

Well now. There’s a righteous plan.  

“Make America Great Again” or “Make America Scared Again.” 

This, when liberals all conned the American voters with a treasonous election hoax and are the genuine “threat to our democracy.” This, when liberals are the ideology of victimization and hopelessness, and the authors of “pocketbook-” draining historic national debt and utter national failure. And then, the strategy for turning out voters is to lie to them some more and to “scare the crap out of them.” 

Do liberals sound like “good” people? And if not good, then what? 


Liberals get themselves into these situations for their odious evils, and faced with electoral decimation what do they do?  

Lie, and scare people.   

It is a little more strategic than that, actually. Political liberals come up with a public relations scheme, have their news media advance it, so voters forget liberals are evil and vote for them again. It’s a team effort. A cyclical process, too—conservatives restore things, liberals destroy things, because that is what evil does. Wash-rinse-repeat. And these PR schemes, are they ever themed with patriotism, love of country and flag, freedom, the constitution, prosperity, or security? 

No. They’re based on lies—and fear, and resentment, and division. 

Or rather, evil. 

Liberals pit races and genders against one another. They exploit children. They lie, which is no small thing, but quite the opposite. They accuse falsely. Whatever evil is required, liberals perform it. Hence the incontrovertible conclusion: 

Liberals are evil. 

But two things define human beings: either goodness or evil. People are either driven by good or by evil, and it isn’t hard to determine each their persuasion.  

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a liberal, is mad at “The Squad,” four more liberal congresswomen. In her new book, Pelosi says “The Squad’s” radical ways are the reason Hispanics and the rest of the country have turned on democrats, and the reason democrats are poised to get shellacked in November’s midterms. Fox News’ Sean Hannity makes superficial issue of this, of the whining and party division.  

However, call the roll on a liberal bill; put climate change friendly legislation up for vote tomorrow. Fact is, every single liberal democrat, to include Pelosi and “The Squad,” will vote for it. 

In other words, forget the whining and party division. Liberals are unified in their singular cause: evil. All the word salad liberals participate in—Jen Psaki from the White House Press Room lectern, Pelosi in her books, on the house floor, on the nightly news—is just that: words. Words, phrases, manipulative and insincere jargon aimed at deceiving the other half of the country. The red, white, and blue half. The lawful half. The proud and patriotic half. Moreover, the good and righteous half.  

Democrats stick together because, one, their goal is Authoritarian control and free people on their subordinate knees. And two, because they are lawless, immoral, and ultimately evil human beings, and followers of evil human beings. 

The Russian collusion hoax was exposed with Mueller’s empty and failed investigation. Hillary was caught paying for it, Obama and his FBI and CIA executing it, and the liberal news media covering it up for years. Has one liberal anywhere been outraged by the evil? Helped expose the crime and get to the truth? Demanded Hillary, Obama, his FBI and CIA, and all involved be held accountable? No. And why not? 

Liberals are a team. “Team Evil.” 

Even worse, liberals control the American culture, to include government. And when a society and government are controlled by evil, what does it portend for the society? 

It surely isn’t anything good. 

Evil doesn’t recognize it is evil. And again, evil is not an “it,” but a they: individual human beings. Or more specifically, liberals. After their evils succeed, these human beings don’t lament their evil deeds. They grin in delight. Because what they accomplished was accomplished for their beliefs.  

In other words, when you rig an election, for example, it’s done for the greater good, which, of course, corresponds to your beliefs. So, what you did was actually a good thing, not evil. That is the warped sense of liberal righteousness, who then make excuses to justify the evil they think is righteousness. Journalist Bernie Goldberg:  

“Liberals, we must always remember, love the underdog. They love the victim. Showing compassion makes them feel noble. Embracing weakness gives them strength. Their perception is their reality. So when they stand up for women’s rights or gay rights or civil rights, they actually believe that they’re beacons of enlightenment courageously standing up to the forces of evil.” 

And yet, liberals are the force of evil. 

Indeed, liberals are sick human beings, evil and warped. Whatever good they do, they do to promote and advance themselves—for publicity, notoriety, acclaim, applause, and financial gain. Liberals love themselves, and they love others loving them, too. And if you’re a righteous sort. Well, you’re not one of them.  

In fact, you’re the enemy.  

The problem with good people is they think they can befriend evil. Liberals are wolves in sheep’s clothing. Wolves who will, no matter how seemingly friendly, watch you bleed out for their religion. Liberals love blacks, gays, and women and everyone else, but only as long as they’re liberal blacks, gays, women, and everyone else. Otherwise, they’ll slit your throat—be you black, gay, female, or anyone else.  

Liberals can’t and don’t tolerate dissent, which means one can be friends with liberals, as long as one doesn’t dissent, which is precisely what people don’t do in their liberal relationships, and are thus lulled into a false sense of friendship. Until the inevitable dissent, of course—I’m sorry, it’s not racist to disagree—where they abruptly learn the truth about their relationship. It is why people should maintain liberal acquaintances instead of friendships. 

The only friend to liberals is another liberal, er, cult member. And even then, challenge cult orthodoxy and cult members will be left to bleed out, too. 

If we were to divide human beings into groups good and evil, we would have two equally diverse groups. It is to say, each group would be comprised of blacks, whites, Asians, Hispanics, Native Americans, women, men, and so on. Evil has nothing to do with race, gender, or any other appearance related factor. Evil is a matter of the heart, which is what makes it so difficult to detect.

The tell? Behavior. It never lies.  

And whose behavior have we indisputably proven evil? 


Evil both defines and binds liberals. Therefore, clearly defined is the age-old struggle: the forces of good versus the forces of darkness and evil. It is a struggle the righteous had better recognize, fight, and win. Or else. 

And that ain’t hyperbole. 

©JMW 4/2022 
All Rights Reserved 

JMW’s Latest Read: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

The Command and Control Conspiracy

Radio host, Dan Bongino: “The ‘Great Reset.’ It goes by various names on the left: New World Order, Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the merging of the physical, digital, biological. It’s all fancy buzz terms for this: throwing out representative democracy and the constitutional republic in exchange for a command-and-control economy where government has the power.  

“It’s happening. Right now.  

“A story in the [Wall Street] Journal reminded me of this. Did you ever wonder where these lockdowns came from? Where this strategy came from? I mean, we did it. We destroyed [the economy]. To be fair it was republicans and democrats—let’s be candid. Did you ever wonder where [the strategy] came from? The idea that locking down an economy, shutting down entire cities, states, and towns was somehow going to prevent the spread of an airborne virus? The idiocy is endless. Where did it come from? You may say, Well, clearly there was some science on it. I mean, obviously. Right? I mean, the government is full of super-smart people.  

“Nah-nah. You’d be wrong about that.  

“It came from China. China [i]s what the great resetters want … read this from the Wall Street Journal—how this idea of a complete economic lockdown was nowhere in the science, anywhere. Ever. [America’s liberals] just love the Chinese Communist Party: command-and-control [communism]. Like, Hey, if [China] can do it, we can do it, too. Here’s a quote from the piece:  

“The absence of lockdowns from these plans,” they’re talking about pandemic plans, “there’s no surprise. They based their analysis primarily on the most serious modern pandemic, the Spanish Flu. An influential 2007 paper analyzed the measures adopted by cities across the US a century ago. Some of these cities imposed quarantine rules on exposed people and closed schools or entertainment venues, including saloons. But the study cites no generalized stay-at-home orders or business lockdowns. So, what led Governor Newsom of California and his counterparts in other states to adopt such drastic and untested measures. Seems obvious in retrospect that they were panicked into following China.”  

“I dispute the last sentence … I dispute one word,” said Bongino. “[Liberals] weren’t ‘panicked.’ Governor Newsom, the Great Resetters, the Klaus Schwab’s and Joe Biden’s of the world loved the idea of a great reset—resetting the economy modeled more after a command-and-control economy in China.  

“[Liberals] saw what China did [releasing the virus]. They loved it. They felt like they could use the [covid] crisis to get away from [a free society]. Because people were scared. Because fear is [liberals’] coin of the realm. And they did it. I don’t think it’s any more complicated than that. [Liberals] love China. They want to do [command-and-control communism] here. They took the opportunity; COVID presented the perfect opportunity. And they did it. It’s right in front of you folks. Social scores coming next—social scoring system just like China.” 


So then, is it possible that there is a coordinated global effort with America’s liberals to transition American from a free society into one commanded-and-controlled by government—by liberals? Well, consider this:  

Liberals have already attempted this command-and-control via healthcare—and not once, but twice. Once with Hillary Clinton in 1993, and then Barrack Obama’s Obamacare. And Obama had his attempt passed by congress, in the middle of the night.  

It was, “A big f-ing deal,” as then vice president, Joe Biden, proclaimed it in Obama’s ear.  

“A big f-ing deal” because, well, liberals had achieved, at least temporarily, a sizeable step towards their command-and-control communist ambitions. A 2010 accomplishment, along with the 1993 attempt, which prove these authoritarian designs existed long before today.  

Incidentally, out of all the vice-presidential candidates to choose from, there is a reason you select someone self-important, unscrupulous, and as corrupt as Joe Biden.  

You want someone who understands you, whose weakness you can exploit. 

For further consideration, who is now openly pining for socialism, which is merely a soft, more palatable and saleable term for command-and-control communism?  

Liberals: the newly and proudly self-proclaimed “Democratic Socialists.” 

Who is fiercely pushing—more like, forcing it down America’s throat—the costly and absurd Green New Deal, and subsequent electric transportation? And upon gaining, er, stealing, super majority control of government, who immediately cancelled American oil pipeline projects, decreased oil production, ended America’s historic “World’s Number One Exporter of Oil” status, sent oil and gasoline prices to record highs, all to force this electric transportation down America’s throat?  

Liberals: the newly and proudly self-proclaimed “Democratic Socialists.” 

And are they restarting the cancelled pipeline project? Ramping up oil production? Re-implementing the Trump policies that made US the “World’s Leading Exporter of Oil?” Or doing anything to bring gasoline prices down from these record highs? 

No. They’re pitching electric cars. Well, not exactly pitching. Coercion isn’t pitching, really. It’s force—like, what they use in command-and-control economies. 

There are but two ways human beings can live: (a) free, or (b) controlled by other human beings. And proving Bongino’s point, liberals clearly prefer option (b). And interestingly, so does the rest of the world’s evil regimes, namely China and Russia. So, are these evil regimes conspiring with America’s liberals, aiding them, in this command-and-control transition of America? 

Well, China is crippling America in numerous ways. Rep. Michael Waltz, Fla.: 

“They’ve cornered the market on things to make our economy go: 90% of our pharmaceuticals, 90% of our computer chips, 90% of our rare earth minerals that we need for basic economic functions that Chinese have cornered. And so, when we say ‘Made in America,’ it’s not just a human rights issue because they’re making those products with modern-day slavery. It’s not just an American jobs issue, it’s a national security issue. We cannot be dependent on our greatest adversary for what makes our society function – and they’ve created that dependency deliberately. And American companies are absolutely complicit.” 

And then, the Taiwan component:  

“[The Chinese] are in a cold war with us. And again, you know, a cold war is when an entity is using diplomatic, informational, economic – taking over international organizations in a way to coerce their opponents. And that’s exactly what the Chinese Communist Party is doing. The big piece of it is going to be Taiwan.  

Why does Taiwan matter so much and why should it matter to the American people?  

“Well, if you look at where it sits on the map, once China controls Taiwan – aside from the fact that it’s a flourishing free market and a democracy that we will have let be forcibly taken over by a communist dictatorship – aside from that, they will then be able to control the trade routes into Japan, into South Korea, Australia, Malaysia and to some extent, even India. And heading into the Middle East, China will then control about half of the world’s GDP and global trade. And at that point, their economic warfare, it will have a huge boost in the arm in terms of their strategy.” 

In other words, even greater command-and-control. Like, giant steps towards global command-and-control.  

China hasn’t made its move against Taiwan, yet. But if they do, will the Biden administration, will liberals, stop them? Two things:  

One, China released a virus on the world, mainly targeting The United States, and thereby crippled America’s economy. And despite the idea of complete economic lockdowns being “nowhere in the science, anywhere, ever,” who locked down America’s economy and helped the communist Chinese cripple her?  

Liberals, establishment-wide. 

Two, Vladimir Putin wanted no part of Donald Trump—nor did Xi Jinping and China, for that matter. Both were model world citizens for four years of the Trump administration. When liberals assumed power, however, Russia suddenly, predictably, invaded Ukraine. And what have liberals done about it?  

Just enough to avoid being accused of doing nothing.  

Hence, will liberals stop China’s aggression toward Taiwan? You mean, after liberals helped China cripple America with economic lockdowns, which were found “nowhere in the science, anywhere, ever?” And that liberals wanted to implement for envy of China’s command-and-control governing style? 

Hereto, liberals will feign outrage and do just enough to avoid being accused of doing nothing. 

Ukraine is Europe’s breadbasket. Russia’s invasion will certainly cause food shortages there, which will affect the rest of the world.  

“The food shock in Ukraine looks devastating,” said Bloomberg. “Grain and sunflower oil in storage from last year’s harvest can’t be shipped because of fighting and port closures. Shelling and fuel shortages may interfere with spring planting and fertilizer farmers need to apply to the winter wheat crop as it emerges from dormancy. Infrastructure damage, labor shortages and continuing conflict could also compromise the summer harvest and transportation of whatever is produced.” 

“Rising food prices are ringing alarm bells for households all over the world,” said the Financial Times Online. “UK food banks say they have never been busier. Supermarkets in Italy have reported panic buying. And in Iraq there have been bread price protests. Food costs were increasing even before the Ukraine war, driven by higher energy prices, transport bottlenecks and, in some countries, farm labor shortages. Now Russia’s invasion has triggered further rises and concerns about prolonged disruption in agriculture-rich Ukraine.”  

And President Biden’s response, the liberal response establishment-wide, to these increasingly dire circumstances?  

“It’s going to be real.”  

Is it, now. Like, real-real? Or just, garden variety real

In both cases, China and Russia, why would liberals do just enough to avoid being accused of doing nothing? Well, because they are helping, of course.  

Assisted by the world’s evil, liberals are attempting to rid America of its “representative democracy and the constitutional republic, in exchange for a command-and-control economy where government has the power.” Or rather, where liberals have the power—enjoyed with the world’s evil, of course.  

Economic shutdowns, purposeful oil shortages, food shortages, intended inflation, treasonous election hoaxes, concealing treasonous crimes via complicitous news media blackouts—America’s liberals are intentionally dooming the United States. You can add financial dooming to the list, too, given their latest $5.8 trillion-dollar budget proposal. Debt on top of already record debt: $28 trillion, or $200,000 per taxpayer.  

The question is: how far do we go, what must be taken away, what must we endure, before we acknowledge America’s liberals are colluding with the world’s evil to bring the United States to her knees and into liberal command-and-control? And into this “New World Order” for which liberals are now openly pining? 

When do we ask the question? Recognize and acknowledge the obvious?   
What need occur before we accept freedom is the target of liberals and the world’s evil?  

Will liberals and their global conspirators confess their intentions, so we’ll know for sure?  Will they warn us so we can act, so we can save our nation and ourselves? 

Gosh, we sure hope so.

Donald Trump warned about all of this. Everything he said liberals, establishment-wide, would do and have done, they are doing and have done. Every socialist agenda item that liberals wanted to pursue, and said they would pursue, they are pursuing. And the facts are, the entire agenda is not only injurious to America. It results in the command-and-control government liberals and their global conspirators seek.  

Discussing the behavior and decisions of the Biden administration and liberals establishment-wide, conservative pundits use terms like inexplicable, lunacy, crazy. They shake their heads nightly in collective astonishment and disbelief, as if liberals are fools running government sans design and intent.  

Well, place that behavior and those decisions under a command-and-control rubric. 

Now where are you?  

Liberals despise America for one reason: they must derive their power from peasants. Know who doesn’t tolerate the peasantry, and is envied and idolized by American liberals for the convenience? 

China. Russia.  

Liberals have the same communist command-and-control aspirations for America. A clear fact that need only be acknowledged, said out loud, and then addressed and remedied—said every captive nation’s populace since the dawn of time … after the fact. 

©JMW 3/2022 
All Rights Reserved 

JMW’s latest read: New Rules:  Relationship Logic for the Darkside.

Never Give Up the Con: the hard and fast rule of hustling

Liberals are con artists, hustlers. Continually lying and deceiving, they must obey a strict rule:  

“Never give up the con.” No matter what!  

A con being what it is—a calculated and secretive fraud—this rule isn’t written or spoken. It’s just, understood. A rule of the hustling trade. A Newman and Redford index finger off the side of the nose. 

In the con industry, the worst thing for business isn’t necessarily getting caught in the con. It is publicly confessing the con. The con, and even a reputation, can both survive being caught. That is, as long as the hustler doesn’t confess the con. Confess it, and hustlers put their believers and followers in an awkward and untenable position. Maintain the con, and those same followers keep fighting, for both the hustle and the hustler. 

So, when you must publicly confess, say for example, that you lied, and that the semen on the dress is indeed presidential and yours, that is a confession to be avoided at all costs. To manage such moments, you say instead, “Indeed, I did have a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky that was not appropriate,” which initially sanitizes your transgression. Then, and this is an important step, then you transition immediately into attack, shelling those who exposed your con and held you accountable.  

This is crucial because it quickly and efficiently diverts attention and focus from your hustle onto someone else. In this case, your political enemies: the perverts with a creepy interest in your private sex life. Not in the fact you lied under oath and throughout your finger-wagging “I didn’t have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky” hustle. But, your private sex life. 

Never give up the con, no matter what—that’s the liberal stratagem. 

In yet another liberal con, actor Jussie Smollett was caught committing a racism hoax. There was a mountain of evidence to affirm the scam—pictures of conspirators purchasing bleach and rope, receipts for the transactions, even the conspirator’s confessions to the conspiracy, no less. Smollett was exposed, and ultimately convicted. And yet, what has he not done? 

He hasn’t given up the con.  

After sentencing he said, “I am innocent … if I did this then it means I stuck my fist in the fears of black Americans in this country for over 400 years, and the fears of the LGBTQ community … I did not do this.” Whatever all that means. Then, leaving the courtroom and raising his fist, “I am innocent! I could’ve said that I was guilty a long time ago!”  

Never give up the con—even when the con gives you up. It’s not helpful to get caught, mind you. But when and if you do, you simply proclaim your innocence, and continue to proclaim it, forever—adding that the system is rigged; that your persecutors are racist; and that it’s all a right-wing conspiracy.  

You never-ever say, “Yeah, I paid two guys to put on MAGA hats and fake a hate crime in the middle of a fiercely cold Chicago night, because I’m a raging homosexual narcissist who craves attention.” 

This will never do. Completely unacceptable. 

The perpetual proclamation of innocence—that’s the only way forward in the con game. 

This is what liberals are forced to do because they are liars and frauds, and ultimately evil human beings. Evil because, lying and committing hoaxes can’t be classified as “good” things. Liberals either tell the lie, or perpetuate the lie, or cover up the lie. But they never-ever-ever give up the con. Even when their presidential semen stains a blue dress, and when special prosecutors indict their campaign for treasonous collusion crimes.  

Never give up the con—no matter what!  

So, after being itself caught lying to the American public on countless occasions. And after concealing the news, specifically the malfeasance of the Democrat party, and of fellow liberals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and even his FBI and CIA. Don’t expect the liberal news media to give up the con, either. “Liberal” the operative word.  Synonymous with, “hustler.” 

CNN, for example, has been a pro-Democrat Party, pro-liberal news network since its inception. The agency’s CEO, Jeff Zucker, has resigned in disgrace. The agency is an inferno of corruption, of deceit and grotesque immorality. And even with all that, and with its credibility completely obliterated, the agency isn’t changing a thing. Why? 

Never give up the con.   

What do you say if your CNN? “We’ve been purposefully lying to the American public to help democrats win elections and implement their political agenda?”  

Hereto, totally unacceptable. Confession to be avoided at all costs. 

Fraudsters never give up the con, which is another way of saying: never confess. It’s better to leave matters in doubt, even when they aren’t in doubt. Even when matters have been resolved, as in, adjudicated. Even when you’ve been actually convicted of a crime.  

When matters aren’t in doubt, you create the doubt: “I am innocent! I did not do this! I could’ve said that I was guilty a long time ago!” You ignore the convictions and prison sentences as if they never occurred. You give your followers a lifeline to cling to, so they still believe, remain loyal, and continue fighting. Because, more than anything in the world they want to believe and to be loyal and to continue fighting. Because they admire and worship you, are warriors cut from the same cloth. And as the leading fraudster, it is your duty to keep the devoted engaged and motivated. How is this accomplished?

Never give up the con. And thereby continue the con. 

The fact is liberals don’t look at their lies and schemes and the unethical and criminal things they do as a “con.” Evil human beings, they look at such things, at all their deviance, in fact, as a display of strategic and intellectual dominance. Hence, they don’t view themselves as despicable con-artists, as detestable, bottom-feeding hustlers damaging and distressing others and making a putrid mess of society and the world. They are nonpareil intellectuals and shrewd strategists showing the world how it’s done.  

Then they give each other awards for their evil successes. Like, Dan Rather’s Peabody Award, which the CBS News anchor received for using forged documents against President George W. Bush. Like, Pulitzer Prizes issued to news agencies, the New York Times and Washington Post, for false Russian collusion reporting

Despite the fraud, liberals grin and slap each other the back at these award ceremonies. Great work, Dan! After which, they proudly display the honor on the office credenza, where they stare at them daily with a sense of achievement and irrepressible pride.  

Evil isn’t some frightening, grotesque devilish figure committing heinous, unspeakable crimes and atrocities. It’s this right here. It’s running a con on human beings and not feeling bad about it. It’s hurting other human beings for your own pleasure and advancement, while making a putrid mess of society and the world to prove your unmatched intellect and strategic shrewdness. It is being caught hurting others for your own pleasure and advancement, and never-ever confessing the con you orchestrated, executed, and furthered on your evening newscast every night for years. 

It isn’t pleasurable to say, but liberals are evil, despicable human beings. They would never tolerate these kinds of things were it republicans or conservatives doing them.  

If, for example, Donald Trump Jr. had a laptop revealing his sexcapades and rampant drug use, and more importantly his father’s financial corruption with China and other nations, liberals one and all would be howling for impeachment and prison for all involved.  

If two of President Donald Trump’s campaign associates were indicted for spying on the Clinton campaign. Or if Trump had approved the spying, as did Barrack Obama, spying his administration no less carried out. Liberals one and all would be screaming “assault on democracy!” and chasing down every single lead to prove it so. 

We know this would be the reaction, because it is precisely what liberals one and all did during the Trump administration. The liberal establishment ran a Russian collusion con to takeout Trump, a duly elected president, and for nearly three years liberals one and all were apoplectic and in fervent pursuit.  

Until they learned it was a con.  

A con perpetrated by liberal leaders, hustlers, who never confessed to the con, which was just fine with the faithful, who preferred it that way, for wanting to believe the hustle anyway, and for wanting to keep fighting for the hustlers, who never gave up the con to inspire the loyalty, and who never will give up the con, because that is the hard and fast rule of hustling.  

So, the cons continue.

Sadly, it’s like falling victim to a Three-card Monte hustler time and again. 

“Gee, I know you’re scamming me and stealing my money, but you do it so, artfully.” 
“Thanks. Double or nothing?” 
“Sure. I feel lucky this time.” 

©JMW 3/2022 
All Rights Reserved 

A Distinct Reason for Peril

These are dangerous times for America. The world’s evil is attempting to destroy her. And here’s something important: the Democrat Party and liberal establishment are in on it, to include liberal republicans. They are the internal enemy, the enemies domestic allied with those foreign: China, Russia, and beyond.  

When the geocabal sees that America’s liberal leaders are weak, what do these leaders think will happen to them, when the cabal has no use for them?  

Naïve and foolish as it is, America’s liberal leaders intend to be in power with them. That’s the objective. A claim evidenced by a treasonous Russia collusion hoax, as of yet unresolved. By Hunter Biden’s laptop, which reveals the President of the United States to be aligned with both Russia and China, another matter as of yet unresolved. Also, by covid czar, Dr. Fauci’s, gain of function deceit, allowing China to acquire and then release a virus on the world, and enabling an election to be stolen via mail-in ballots. And most damning of all, a claim evidenced by a clearly complicit liberal news media that is completely mum on ALL of it.  

It is a geopolitical takeover of America headed by the Democrat Party and the liberal establishment. A sixteen-year plot began by Barrack Obama, one briefly interrupted for the miraculous Trump years. Now, with Joe Biden in charge, the geopolitical cabal is back on schedule, having brought to heel Trump-driven American superiority to render the United States weak and vulnerable.  

And what is Biden doing about both China and Russian aggression?  

Standing down.  

What did he do on his first day in office? Closed America’s XL pipeline, and then approved a Russian energy pipeline.  

Liberals despise America obviously; they say it in so many implied ways. Why then would they have a problem destroying her?  

They wouldn’t. Especially when facing the doom of all these ongoing investigations into their corruption and treason. 


A list of compromised people and institutions reveals that something is definitely, majorly, and clearly wrong. The FBI and CIA, the world’s premiere law enforcement and intelligence agencies, are compromised. Caught spying on a political candidate, for a political candidate, and under the approval of a President of the United States of the advantaged political party.  

In other words, Barrack Obama and his entire administration are compromised. 

Orchestrating the Russian collusion hoax, Hillary Clinton is compromised. The resulting $42 million-dollar investigation wasn’t financed by her, but by the American public, for her political benefit. Investigating the fraud, US Attorney John Durham has indicted Clinton’s campaign attorney, Michael Sussmann, and also Christopher Steele’s fake dossier source, Igor Danchenko.  

Covid czar, Dr. Anthony Fauci, is compromised. He lied about gain of function research, and a great many other things. He nixed the lab-leak theory when he knew it was true, or at least viable. He concealed emails and information. He aligned with pro-vaxxers and –maskers, and then publicly smeared epidemiological dissenters from three world renowned academic institutions: Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford.   

The Democrat Party is compromised. The DNC rigged a primary election for Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders in 2016, then did it to Bernie again in 2020 in favor of Joe Biden. Via the Obama administration, the party presided over Clinton’s Russian collusion hoax, and over a treasonous and corrupt FBI and CIA. It also orchestrated the endless four year lies and smears and fake investigations of the Trump administration, to include two contrived, meritless impeachment attempts.  

Hollywood, America’s political class, corporate America—they are all compromised. Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of recruiting and grooming teenage girls for sexual encounters with the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein. A man of vast wealth connected to elites in Hollywood, Washington, and corporate America, with a Little Black Book and flight logs to Epstein’s Pedophile Island to prove it. Thus far, Maxwell is the first person in history convicted of trafficking children to absolutely no one. 

The “president” of the United States, Joe Biden, is compromised. Not only is he a conspirator in Obama era spying and treason. His son Hunter’s incriminating laptop is suddenly real and in existence. This after being labeled “Russian disinformation” prior to the 2020 election, and thusly censored by the national news media, social media, and big tech so as to not affect the election of Biden.  

The laptop’s contents expose deep and lucrative Biden family financial corruption with China, a communist competitor and enemy, and with Russia, also a competitor and enemy, and elsewhere. Treasonous crimes no less chronicled is two recent best-selling books by authors and award-winning journalists, Miranda Devine and Peter Schweizer.  

Incidentally, it is amazing how documents, travel logs, and other compromising material can’t be found where it concerns the corruption of liberal administrations, and their family members.  

Further, a clearly ailing Biden, who ran his entire presidential campaign from an underground bunker, and who can’t hourly remember his own name, somehow managed to acquire more votes than any president in American history. The outcome suggests grotesque voting fraud, of course, which was actually exposed in five important battleground states, and is still being exposed. Yet, throughout the process of exposure, the matter was mocked and dismissed by, whom? 

The national news media, the liberal news media, the establishment news media—ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, PBS. They, too, are collectively compromised. All these historic crimes being exposed. All this deep, unprecedented, and flagrant political corruption being revealed, and being adjudicated in court, no less, with real court filings and case numbers. And the national news media not only knows about it all, but is ignoring it all.   

All of it: 

FBI and CIA spying/corruption/treason? Nothing. 

Obama administration treasonous spying and corruption? Nothing. 

Durham’s case against Hillary, and the FBI, CIA, and the Obama administration? Nothing. 

Dr. Fauci’s gain of function lie, his failed covid prescriptions? Nothing. 

The Democrat Party’s election fraud and lies? Nothing. 

Jeffrey Epstein’s crime, the involvement of Hollywood, political, and corporate elites? Nothing. 

Hunter Biden’s laptop, the Biden’s family financial deals with China and Russia? Nothing. 

2020 election fraud in five key battleground states? Nothing. In fact, it’s a Trump lie. 

“President” Biden’s obvious cognitive disabilities? Nothing 

“Nothing” meaning, one: as opposed to the investigative journalistic vigor of a Trump accusation. And two, quite literally zero—the event never occurred—news coverage.   

So, again. Something is definitely, majorly, and clearly wrong. But, what exactly?  

We have these major and historic political crimes, and this colossal mass of establishment corruption staring the country directly in the face. We have all this national confusion and dysfunction of the last five years, which none of the normal people and institutions responsible for tackling such things want to clear-up and bring to conclusion. The constitution and the law are being flagrantly ignored and broken. Citizens are being forced to do what they don’t want to do. Money is being spent at obscene and historic levels, and massive and historic national debt, $30 trillion dollars, assumed. And without a form leadership or policing, the United States citizenry is left to just, suffer it all.   

Okay. But, why? Why is all this brazenly criminal, anti-American, third-world stuff happening? And being allowed to happen? 

There is an answer. 

Imagine a broad panoramic view of the last five years since the November 2016 election—the view being of all the liberal treachery and subsequent national dysfunction that has consumed America. To understand why all this stuff has happened, the last five years have happened, the full panoramic is actually a distraction. We need only focus on one small, very thin sliver of the wider view to explain the entirety.  

In other words, all this is happening for a singular, perhaps inconspicuous reason. It is like a panoramic sea of lifeless mountainous rock, whereon stands one lone mountain goat. You don’t really see the creature anomaly, until you see it. Then, it is all you see. The lifeless mountainous rock is the diversion. The lone, inconspicuous mountain goat is the explanation.  


Every destination has its path. It is to say, human beings, in this case nation states, do not arrive at any particular destination by osmosis. Behaviors and decisions are responsible, which set destination’s course.  

It is to say, there is a reason we got here, at this place of national toxicity and peril.  

Part of the reason is, liberals feel themselves superior to other human beings and therefore entitled to power. Thus, they don’t like being subject to a voting majority of inferior people and having their power constrained by the second-class—a democratic system liberals have been working steadily, diligently, covertly, piece by piece, stumbling block by stumbling block, accusation by accusation, to dismantle for decades. Until they finally created enough dysfunction, and a sizeable league of disillusioned and dysfunction- and crisis-weary voters, to achieve a communist outcome—which has always been the objective.  

In the meantime, liberals coopted the national news media, partnering with fellow corporate ideologues, and installing political acolytes to masquerade as newspersons. All to control the flow of information and to advance the liberal political agenda. Then they added Big Tech, social media, and corporations to achieve near total control of the public microphone, and thereby the culture, and most importantly, the control of information.  

Whatever we want to conceal, we can. 

With the election of Barrack Obama in 2008, the takeover operation reached a critical point. Obama’s presidency the impetus, establishment liberals, along with likeminded elite allies around the world, decided this was the time, was the moment to make their long-dreamed-about communist move. Obama’s stated goal was to “transform” the country, which he professed in a pre-election speech. Why transform an established country? One with a constitution and an established form of governance, which involves citizen control, and freedom and liberty for all? 

Why? Because you desire an alternative form of government. One in which liberals get to control and dictate. Because ruling is their right.  Per their superiority, indeed, it is their obligation. Within this arrangement, liberals don’t have to tolerate second-class voters anymore, and aren’t subject to inferior people.  

Your average liberal voter would say, “Oh, that isn’t what liberals are doing. That’s absurd.”  

Well, what is rigging two primary elections for a desired candidate? What is a Russian collusion hoax to steal the presidency? What is attempting to destroy the people’s choice for the presidency with hoaxes and lies and contrived investigations?  What is ignoring and concealing historic political crimes to maintain a particular political party’s power and control? 

Lesson: never listen to a liberal voter. Ever.  

Obama had a sixteen-year plan to transform the country, from a system controlled by the citizenry, a voting democracy, to one controlled by the establishment elite. At the end of his own eight-year term, they—hereafter to be recognized as Obama, Hillary Clinton, the news media, the FBI, CIA, and deep state, and collectively, the establishment—rigged the outcome so that Hillary Clinton would, for eight more years, become the next president and complete the national “transformation.”  

Purely by Divine providence, the measures they had put into place to guarantee the Clinton succession and subsequent transformation, failed. Donald Trump became president and not only interrupted the plot, but exposed it, and threw the conspiratorial cabal into panic.  

Thus, and this is crucial, the ensuing four years were not about Donald Trump. They we’re about concealing the treasonous crimes of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. They were about concealing the 16-year transformative and treasonous plot to break the United States and bring it under authoritarian control. A fact evidenced by Obama’s signature accomplishment, and failure: single-payer healthcare, aka, Obamacare. An incontrovertibly communist objective first attempted by whom? Hillary Clinton. 

And paragraphically, there it is: the “creature anomaly,” the lone mountain goat. The sliver of the wider view which explains the entirety. 

From the beginning of Trump’s presidency to its end, and even beyond, that is what the entire Trump presidency represents: the concealment of the communist plot against the United States. A geopolitical plot, in fact, involving America’s communist enemies—China, Russia, and beyond. 

Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.” 

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev: “I understand. I [will] transmit this information to Vladimir [Putin].” 

Locally for they, the Trump years were about protecting and saving not only Obama and Clinton from exposure, but preserving establishment power and control, too.  

Lose establishment control, lose power.  

Given his access to intelligence, one instantly understands the massive threat Trump’s presidency represented, and still represents. 

Trump: “There is nothing the political establishment will not do, no lie that they won’t tell, to hold their prestige and power at your expense. And that’s what has been happening …” 

At the end of Trump’s term, the entire liberal establishment knew, based on everything Trump had accomplished—a roaring economy, record stock market, advantageous trade deals, world’s leading exporter of oil, oil independence, lower gas prices, American dominance and leadership—the 100% pro-American triumph did not portend well for a communist takeover. And given his popularity, buttressed by the size of his rallies and his record 75 million votes in the 2020 election, the entire liberal cog, they, knew another four-year Trump term was inevitable.  

The answer? 

A bio-weapon.   

Covid-19 allowed they to not only lockdown and cripple the United States economically, and to drive it toward crises and control-inspiring despair. Most importantly, it enabled the installation of mail-in ballot boxes, which the establishment, they, used, among other means, to steal an election it knew it could not win. A corrupt election that saw a reviled, plagiaristic, gaff-prone, and clearly demented president receive more votes than any president in history.  

And if this result is truly where America is as a nation, that a failure like Biden would receive more votes than Ronald Reagan. Then they’s timing was perfect. 

So China and they had the same interests, and were conspiratorial. They rigged an election via a virus—one releasing the weapon, the other employing it to political advantage—so they could finish the transformational job they started. However, the Trump presidency had created a problem. It not only interrupted and exposed the plot. After four years of America first success, Trump gave the country a vision of what America could be, a vision of the independence and security and prosperity she could have and enjoy. Rather, the American citizen could have and enjoy. 

Making America Great Again—Donald Trump did that.  

In doing so, Trump exposed not only the liberal establishment’s ineptitude, but moreover its negligence—its lack of desire to get things done for the people it serves, for serving and enriching itself. Or rather, themselves. It is self-interest that inspired corruption, and then the lust for even greater power and control, such that would guarantee perpetual power and control. An authoritarian goal that could be no less realized via spying on political opponents with federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and via rigged and thus controlled elections, which, of course, would bring to an end subjection to a voting majority of inferior people—a loathsome arrangement that led to a sixteen-year global conspiracy to make the authoritarian idea reality. 

All with assistance from a complicit national news media, of course. 

The only danger is failing to kill the king and getting caught. Or rather, losing the election you rigged and having the plot exposed. This is precisely what happened. And after four years of swamping Trump and the country you intend to transform in hoaxes, baseless accusations, and fake investigations, you turn to your co-conspirator, China, for a little viral help with concealing your treasonous sins. 

Now. As for the critical presidency, they could have chosen anyone to install. So, why Joe Biden? Biden was in fact, and predictably, performing terribly during the 2020 democrat primary. That is, until South Carolina’s, James Clyburn, rode in to endorse Biden. Suddenly Biden was the belle of the ball, while the current leader, Bernie Sanders, was yet again shoved to the dance-partnerless bullpen.  

It was clear democrat voters did not want Biden. So, why did they want Biden, of all people? A laughing stock. A gaffe machine. A plagiarist and two-time failed presidential candidate. Why him, specifically? 

According to Politico, Obama himself even said, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f— things up.” And as for Biden’s primary candidacy: “And you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden.” Biden was not only performing poorly and losing spectacularly in the democrat primary. His cognitive issues were suspected at the time, too. And later, before the election, he was compromised by his son Hunter’s laptop and the compromising financial corruption it foretold.  

So, why?  Why was it imperative that Biden be president?  

Two reasons: primarily, Biden was a conspirator in the treasonous Obama administration and Clinton Russian collusion hoax. Secondarily, they could use his complicity to run the Oval Office. Simply, they could trust their treasonous sin to no one else. So, they needed an insider, someone equally culpable. They needed someone they could control, to: mitigate their treasonous vulnerability, one. And two, to continue the plot and complete the now vital and compromised “transformation.” 

The problem with conservatives, with Americans in general, actually, is they don’t think dark enough. It is precisely what Christ meant when he said, “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.”  

In other words, it is good to love your fellow man and to think well of humankind. But it is equally important, if not more so, to have an intimate understanding of evil. To know the depths of evil, which is actually a bottomless abyss. Conservatives are always dealing with the visible, superficial, symptomatic evil, such as the hypocrisy and lies and deceit of liberals, namely. Conservatives don’t comprehend evil’s depths, or the disturbing, unfathomable lengths to which evil will resort and is capable.  

Conservative people don’t comprehend the depths because they don’t relate to evil or evil people, either one. Unlike liberals, conservative people strive to do good, and are truth seekers. On the way to truth, they endeavor to make fair and righteous judgements, instead of judgments based on appearance and emotion. Succinctly, conservatives labor over visible evil, when evil is far more depraved than they can possibly imagine.  

Like, say, rigging elections and committing treasonous hoaxes for political gain. Are those “good” intentions and ambitions? Or evil?  

What about lying about people, and smearing them, and trying to destroy their reputations? And making people’s lives unnecessarily difficult, tedious, joyless, and expensive? Are those “good” practices, or evil?   

And releasing a bio-weapon to win an election and conceal your treasonous sins. “Good?” Or evil? 

Evil drives the Democrat Party and the liberal establishment, and a portion of the Republican Party, too—the establishment aligned portion. Simply, they aren’t doing things the good and righteous way, and are not in the slightest concerned with honesty, integrity, or morality none of the three.  

As for evidence: behavior never lies. 

The liberal and establishment goal has always been to destroy America, as founded, anyway. Because inferior people, the peasantry, control it. And the control has limits, renders certain electoral obligations that liberals would rather not endure, and superiorly feel they should not have to endure. And now, they are conspiring with America’s enemies to achieve their transformational goal.  

Whom did establishment liberals attack over the Covid-19 virus? China? Or their impending and imposing political opponent and nemesis, Donald Trump? Who mocked Mitt Romney for saying Russia was America’s primary political foe, and claimed the “80’s wanted their foreign policy back?”  

On both counts, it was establishment liberals. And currently, Biden is doing nothing of substance to oppose either of them.   

If you accept Biden cannot hourly remember his own name, then you realize he isn’t making executive decisions. And if Biden isn’t making executive decisions, then, who is?   

That would be the traitors within: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the deep state. They. The very same people who tried to transform the United States with, first, a treasonous rigged primary for Clinton, then a Russian collusion hoax, and finally an election securing China virus. And if you have committed treason to cover up treason, what evils aren’t you then prepared to further commit?  

Again, people don’t think dark enough. 

The liberal establishment doesn’t just dislike conservatives. It despises them, literally seethes when discussing and addressing them. Add to that, liberals clearly have a vision for the United States, a vision that can be described in a single word: control. They want to control elections, healthcare, and quite literally everything and everybody.  

And when a political ideology genuinely loathes, not just the conservative ideas, but the principle ideas of law and morality and ethics, and does not want those ideas approved and to reign. When, at home and abroad, its acolytes constantly disparage the country they serve—its flag, its anthem, its heritage, its citizens. And when it wants to control elections so as to maintain perpetual power and control.  

This the math, what then is the conclusion? 

That political party has authoritarian designs and communist aspirations. 

There is no other conclusion.  

And to achieve the long-desired end, liberals have now partnered with America’s enemies. 

Indeed, liberals are the enemy. 

©JMW 3/2022 
All Rights Reserved 

An Extraordinary Nazarene, and Associates

So, how did Jesus do it? I couldn’t have done it; I know that. I would have flopped both wrists at the crowd and said, Nevermind. I gotta go. And then, leaving, became increasingly smaller.  

Not Jesus. Concerning him, extraordinary doesn’t begin to cover it. 

The most important thing to know about Jesus is that he was human. He had all those same human feelings coursing through his body. All those same, ugly, unrighteous and not so productive compulsions. People get angry when you say this about Christ, him being Divine and all.  But, it’s true—that he was humanly burdened, if Divine.  

If Jesus hadn’t come in the flesh, in human form and character, then it would have been said he didn’t understand human beings; that he wasn’t subjected to the world, to the struggle of the human experience, as they are; and ultimately that he couldn’t relate. Thereto, his mission being to eventually give his life for all humankind, it would be quite impossible to crucify a spirit.  

Hence, Christ needed to be flesh. Or, human. 

Defining the human experience are but two realms: spirit and flesh. Thus, there is a physical world, basically all the things seen by the naked eye. And a spiritual world, intuitively perceived things, basically, which cannot be seen, but are spiritually sensed. This is a mystical world beyond the scope of normal scientific understanding, and one modern science claims does not exist.  

Nevertheless, God is a spiritual being. He is in fact the “Father of Spirits,” as the Apostle Paul confirmed. And despite all the miraculous and wondrous things God had done for the Jews on the journey from Egyptian bondage. Despite having visibly revealed himself to both the Jews and the world in so many clear and intervening ways. Humans had rejected him—and rejected him throughout the Bible’s entire Old Testament, incidentally.  

As a result, God said, Okay, fine. To help humans believe in me, I’ll send a version of myself that is characteristically like them, but who can yet do all the miraculous and wondrous things I can do.  

Enter Jesus, via the Bible’s New Testament. 

Indeed, Jesus possessed extraordinary power, which he revealed time and again in the Bible’s gospels. Physiologically and characteristically, however, he was a full-fledged member of the human pack. His extraordinariness derives from one recorded fact alone: he did things differently than humans. He did them more righteously, and better, and exemplarily. 

Exhibit A:  

Jesus is among his own people, the Jews, in Jerusalem. He comes upon a helpless man lying by a local pool, a hangout for the ailing in hopes of Divine healing. Jesus asks the helpless man if he wants to be healed. The man says yes, to which Jesus replies, “Rise, take up thy bed, and walk.”   

For the first time in 38 years, it is precisely what the man did.  

Afterward, bed in hand, the formerly helpless man was walking around town. Only, it was the sabbath day—a religious day of rest and no work, which forbid this carrying of one’s bed. The local Jews took exception. Accosting the man, he explained that he had been healed, and that his healer, Jesus, had told him to “take up his bed and walk,” which he was joyously doing.  

The response of the accusing horde?  

They sought to slay this Jesus—for healing on the sabbath. A day of rest and no work, to inexplicably include miraculous healings and the carrying of one’s own bed, after. 

Locating Jesus, the horde accused him of breaking sabbath law. In response to all these accusive carryings-on, Jesus simply replied, My Father works on the Sabbath, and so do I.  

In saying, Christ had made himself equal to God, which shouldn’t have been such the stretch, incidentally, given the formerly helpless man standing and holding his bed in delighted and visible testament, and pointing at Jesus. Nevertheless, the Jews were doubly offended and incensed. 

So here is Jesus standing among all these angry, accusing Jews wanting to stone him, or whatever the archaically heinous means of death. Were it me in this situation, your humble writer, I make one statement: Look, folks. I mean, here this guy stands—helpless for 38 years, and now he’s not. He says I healed him, which I did. And I ask you, who but God and his son could’ve done such a thing? A good thing, no less.

“So, the sabbath. Tuesday. Saturday night. What’s the problem?” 

Then for dramatic effect, and perhaps a little humiliation, I would grab the formerly helpless man and say, Still unconvinced? Okay, watch this …  

Then I’d zap him with my supernatural powers and watch him drop to the ground like a wet noodle, and back to his formerly helpless state.  

Motionless and moaning, I would then zap him again and heal him.  

The man standing and relieved. Believe me now? I’d ask my accusers.  

No?  Here, once more … zap! 

Collapse. Motionless, moaning. 

Zap! Standing and once again relieved: “Please! Not again, Lord! I think they get the point!” 

But they wouldn’t get the point. In fact, they would likely claim I had “devils,” and that I was doing Satan’s work. Sound familiar?

Yes: the precise accusation after another of Christ’s miracles. 

As I said, I couldn’t have done it. It’s here that I’d flop my wrists and begin getting smaller. I wouldn’t want to listen to it! I wouldn’t want to put up with the accusations, the willful blindness, or the drama none of the three.  

Channeling Colonel Jessup: “You [friggin’] people.” 

Jesus could have made this same demonstration. But, no matter what he said or did, no matter how many miracles he performed, which were incalculable, and widely known and testified to, and even witnessed. There would be no evidence satisfactory or miraculous enough to change the hearts and minds of these Jews. People who actually got to experience these wondrous things firsthand, no less. 

Were I disciple, I would’ve said, Come on Jesus, let’s bounce. These knuckleheads are hopeless. Truth is, I’d be right. But then there is the whole, parable of the lost sheep thing Jesus kept going on and on about. How the good shepherd leaves the flock to find one, just one, stray, and how glad he is to find it.  

With palpable disappointment, Jesus would surely remind me of this. Reciting the whole parable to me again.  Yeah, I know. Lost sheep. Happy shepherd. I remember. 

As to the extraordinariness of Jesus, this is the point. Where I would have been ready to bounce, Jesus wanted to win over one last lost disbeliever among the knuckleheads, and was willing to put up with the angry mobbish crap to do it. Sent to persuade all of humankind of his Father’s existence and love and forgiveness, Jesus wanted to make his case to perhaps one last potential soul. And that is what he did, and rather convincingly, too.  

Actually, convincingly doesn’t describe it. It was much more, complete. 

Jesus began by reaffirming who he was and giving this spiel about performing his Father’s assigned work, and how he had been given the power and authority to do it [John 5:19-30].  

Then, he got to the meat [John 5:31-47]. With the skill of a brilliant trial attorney, he laid the logical leather to his accusers. For clarity, a practical adaptation: 

Listen, folks. If I testify to my own credibility, my word alone doesn’t mean much. It doesn’t prove my claim, that I’m the Son of God, the promised messiah. But it isn’t just me. John the Baptist vouched for me, too. You yourselves asked John about me, and he verified my claim. He was to you a genuine prophet, a person you trusted, and whose prophetic claims you were readily willing to accept and believe. What is he now? A lying fraud? 

John’s endorsement should be enough. But I have yet an even greater, more credible witness than him that proves me: my many miracles. Feeding five thousand people with five loaves of bread and two fish. Healing the blind and deaf, the maimed, and the demon possessed.  

And this man here, helpless for 38 years, now holding his bed—how are you feeling, by the way? Okay? Good.

Whom among you can do such things? Hmm? [scanning the crowd] Thats right, none of you. Because none of you are the Son of God, the promised messiah, whom the prophet you trusted and believed not only told you about, but then confirmed. Know who is the promised messiah? 


And my many miracles further prove it. They prove my Father, your God, is real, too. They prove the very same God who led your ancestors from Egypt, whom you read about and pray to, has sent me—the promised messiah. So, even God has vouched for me. Yet, you won’t believe him, either.  

He hasn’t vouched for me, you say? 

Search your holy scriptures. The ones you study, and from which you teach. The ones that contain the laws you so zealously uphold and enforce. Indeed, they vouch for me, too. 

So. Although it’s clear God has sent me, you won’t believe or accept me, either one. Let someone else vouch for themself, however, and you’ll believe and accept him, no questions asked, no evidence required. How can you so readily accept a stranger’s word, but not the proof of me that no less comes directly from your supposed God? Via John the Baptist, my many miracles, the scriptures, even the words of our beloved Moses, whose very name you revere and in whom you trust? 

That’s right, even Moses. If you don’t believe his writings about me [Genesis 3:15, 12:3, 18:18, 22.18, 49:10, Deuteronomy 18:15], then how will you believe my words?

[scanning the blank stares]. 

And with that, Jesus bounced for the Sea of Galilee. 

Every conveyed fact is scriptural, having been laid out in astounding sequence over hundreds of years via the Bible, no less. It is impossible to offer a more compelling and convincing argument, and to have more verifiable credibility. Therefore, it is impossible not to believe Jesus is who he claims to be, outside of simply not wanting to believe it. In that, it is amazing the degree of obstinance towards ideas that human’s do not want to accept and believe, and the lengths to which they will go to prevent truth from corrupting their desired beliefs. 

And that doesn’t just concern Jesus and belief in God, either.   

What Makes Jesus even more extraordinary is that, before making these remarks, he knew he would die. He knew how he would die. He knew for whom he would be put to death—these very Jews. Most astonishing, he knew these persuasion efforts would be utterly fruitless. Because he had the power to know. 

And yet, here he was—making the case to potentially one last lost soul, and trying anyway. 

Who but a genuine “savior” would bother? 

All this impeccable and unassailable evidence, and yet Jesus can’t be The Christ?  The fleshly, visible, no less scripturally promised representation of God Almighty? 

No.  No he cannot.  At least, not where these Jews are concerned, namely the Jewish leaders, who saw to Christ’s death. If Jesus is the Son of God, then enjoying the satisfying earthly benefits of human deity were over for them.  

“Self-love,” as Milton said. “The all-natural opiate.”  

Christ’s identity confirmed, humans become instantly inferior. All become subjects, each the same status. Each being answerable to God, who is no respecter of persons. Legitimizing Christ made God real, proved his existence. It made God the creator of all things, the final authority—his rules dominant, his judgement final.  

God is to be worshiped, not humans—namely these Jewish leaders.  

A verified and proclaimed Christ presented a higher authority, and brought to an end the vanity and ruse of human superiority. Speaking of the Jews on the matter, Christ: 

If I hadn’t shown up on the scene. If I hadn’t performed the many miracles no human can perform. Then they were neither sinners nor evil. Because there isn’t then a ruling authority to disobey and to sin against, or a concept of evil, either one. But now that I’m here, they are evil sinners both, and undeniable. They have seen the miracles. They have thus seen me and my Father. And they have hated both me and my Father. Because if you they hate me, then they hate my Father, too [John 15:22-24]. 

Despite their claims to the contrary and their religious performance, the Jews, particularly the Jewish leaders, didn’t really believe in God. They were posers, believing with their mouths but not their hearts. In fact, they fancied themselves superior to both Jesus and God. Christ again: 

I am the light that has come into the world, and therein lies the condemnation. Human beings love the darkness more than the light, because their deeds are evil. Those that do evil hate the light, hate goodness and righteousness, hate truth and, indeed, hate me and my Father. They avoid the light, otherwise their evil is verified and reprimandable. Those who love the truth, on the other hand, they come to the light. Because they want their good deeds and righteousness to be made visible, and to prove themselves in alliance with God [John 3:19-21]. 

Who but a genuine “savior” would understand and convey such a concept? 

Jesus was a far superior human in so many ways. Yet he spent his brief life putting up with angry mobbish crap in an attempt to persuade every last lost soul. Then after raising people from the dead, after miraculously healing countless people, after loving the unloved, and befriending the friendless, and encouraging people towards higher ideals, he was nailed to a cross and mocked. 

The work of conversion Jesus then left to his associates, his disciples, who, like Christ and all the Old Testament prophets before him, were persecuted and murdered, too. As the devoted prophet Stephen said to the Jews before his own murder, “Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted [and slain]?”

Answer: all of them. Including Stephen.

And modern ministers—pastors, priests, men and women of God. They continue the work. People today out there ripping it up, living by the sword, not wanting to hear about God. And it is ministers charged with telling them about sin, and self-discipline, and required righteousness—a truth and concept firmly established on the streets of Jerusalem thousands of years ago, and that endures today.

And yet, these modern ministers don’t flop their wrists and bounce, either. 

Indeed, this Nazarene and his many associates are pretty extraordinary. 

©JMW 2/2022 

All Rights Reserved 

Pandora’s Religious Mishap

“We have so many serious problems [regarding COVID],” said Georgia congresswoman, Marjorie Taylor Greene, “and we can point them all at one man … Dr. Fauci. [He] is responsible for all this. He created the gain of function. He gave it to China. They created the bioweapon, which is COVID-19, and it broke the world. Our government and anyone that goes along with this and doesn’t fire Fauci, investigate him, prosecute him and hold him accountable is failing the American people.” 

In a November 2021 senate hearing, Senator Rand Paul made these remarks directly to Fauci, a chapter in the pair’s ongoing feud, “Your persistent denials [of funding gain of function research] … are not simply a stain in your reputation but a clear and present danger to the country and to the world. Why does it matter?” Paul continued. “Because gain of function research with laboratory created viruses not found in nature could cause a pandemic even worse than the next time. We’re suffering from one today that has a mortality of approximately 1%. They’re experimenting with viruses that have mortality between 15% and 50%. Yes. Our civilization could be at risk from one of these viruses.” 

That’s, “civilization.”  Worst case, 165 million Americans dead. 

Now, your average liberal would say all this is right-wing, Trumpian hyperbole.  This, as a biologically weaponized virus from a lab in, communist adversarial China!, has killed nearly 850 thousand people in American alone, thus far.  

Liberals aren’t known for their brain power, we realize.  However, is intellect really necessary in this instance?  This seems one of those simplistic, instinctual matters.  Like, “Uh-oh, a gut pain.  Better find a restroom, pronto!”   

Some things you just know. Have a, gut feeling about. 

So, this gain of function research matter, is it true?  Did Fauci fund it?  

National Institutes of Health Director, Lawrence A. Tabak, says he did, via the New York Post.  

So, is the Post lying and defaming Fauci?  Did Tabak not speak to the Post and present his incriminating data?  Well then, sue the Post for libel. Is anyone doing that?  


Moving on. 

To be clear, gain of function research is a process of taking viruses from animals and genetically altering them in a lab to make them more transmissible to humans. The obvious question here would be: why would anyone ever do something so needless and dangerous?  But then, there’s the whole biological warfare idea explaining things. You know, bad people, like, I don’t know, communist regimes, using viruses against their enemies to conquer the world.  

Yes, moving on. 

Tabak’s confession contradicts Fauci’s testimony before Congress in May and in July 2021.  After the Post’s report was made public, Senator Paul tweeted, “‘I told you so’ doesn’t even begin to cover it here.”  

Then, more recently, Paul and Fauci were sparring again over a Fauci email, wherein he, from on high, the czar of all things covid, conspired to takedown the dissenting opinion of prominent epidemiologist from Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford universities.  

“Evidently there are a lot of fringe epidemiologists at Harvard … Standford … and Oxford,” Paul said sarcastically, pausing between the three world-renowned academic institutions for effect.   

Even so, Fauci set to not only taking down these dissenters, these prominent epidemiologists from world renowned educational institutions.  He was thrilled to do it, as the email attests. Unseemly enthusiasm that “doesn’t exactly conjure up the image of a dispassionate scientist,” Paul noted. 

In other words, one, Dr. Fauci is behaving like a religious zealot, instead of an objective, truth-seeking scientist. And two, he is behaving like a politician, seeking to destroy his ideological enemies and all.     

The fact and point are, Fauci funded the gain of function research and, denying it, lied under oath about it. And rather than confess the indisputable truth, Fauci has, for months, balked and bristled at every single one of Senator Paul’s inquiries about it, and never answered any of them. So, obviously, there’s a problem with doctor Fauci and his gain of function research—the problem being he funded it and, as Marjorie Taylor Green asserts, is then responsible for the pandemic.  

This true, where is the news media? The issue involving world health, vast human suffering and death, the deceit and fraud of a public official, and national security, why aren’t mainstream news agencies covering the revelation? If Fauci funded the research, then he is indeed responsible for the pandemic. He is the originator. The nexus. The cause. And a traitor, perhaps? 

So then, is it any mystery Fauci is balking and bristling at questions about gain of function research, and not providing answers?  Fauci a god of the Democrat Party and the liberal establishment, is it any mystery the news media isn’t covering Fauci’s viral crime against humanity? 

In regard to the media neglect, the reality is this: if the news media opens the Pandora’s Box of gain of function, then it presents questions they neither want to ask nor have answered.  For example: 

Why did Fauci lie about the research and funding?   

Was he working with China?  

Why was he working with China?  To affect a 2020 election democrats could not win, perhaps?   

Was he then working with the Democrat Party—they seem to worship and protect him?  

What other democrats were then involved—we know Hunter and Joe Biden have China financial entanglements via Miranda Devine’s recent book, and Peter Schweizer’s forthcoming manuscript?   

Hereto, are these two right-wing wordsmiths defaming the Biden’s, the “President” of the United States, with slanderous China lies, too? 

Well then, sue them for libel. Is anyone suing?   

No. And why not? 

It opens yet another of Pandora’s Boxes. 

What role does Bill Gates and other uber-wealthy elite play in Fauci’s crime?   

Was Fauci colluding with the pharmaceutical industry?   

Who financially benefits from the pandemic, anyway? Now there’s something that usually excites the news media. Aren’t the beneficiaries the very people and industries with whom Fauci is professionally aligned?  The entire science and health industries? 

All these questions, believe it or not, are merely the tip of the iceberg—the Pandoric items that first spill forth for her box being so grossly overstuffed with inquiries.  We don’t get answers from Fauci on the matter because he, understandably, doesn’t want to condemn himself.  We don’t get answers from the news media, either, because they want to keep a lid on Pandora’s Box—or rather, Pandora’s Boxes: Russian collusion, Jeffrey Epstein, the Bidens and China, voter fraud—which reveals the news media’s loyalties and corruption, as well.   

The gain of function research funding happened.  Fauci knows it happened. He lied about it under oath and, as Marjorie Taylor Greene correctly charges, is responsible for the pandemic.  The question is: does America have a government that will, as she says, fire Fauci, investigate him, prosecute him, and hold him accountable?   

We shall see.  I would add, but don’t hold your breath.  But a looming 50% mortality rate has me believing each breath is rather precious, and to be enjoyed.  Breathe deeply while you can, I say. 

All this is interesting.  More interesting, however, is Aaron Rupar. Who is Aaron Rupar?  


He’s a liberal journalist for Vox, the news “shepherds.” No one would know or care about Rupar were he not a “journalist.”  This is what makes journalism so attractive, incidentally, particularly to those who were ignored all their lives and never received any attention or notoriety, and who were perhaps shunned by the opposite sex for being, say, nerdy and/or unattractive.   

Become a journalist however, and, Boom!  Bright lights, a byline of your very own, celebrity, and all the attention you never received, but so very much deserved!   

Standing, arms wide, spinning—Look at me; I’m a journalist!  Say my naaaaame, people!!  

Question: why can’t liberal journalists separate their liberal religion and egos from their reporting?  Cult restrictions, perhaps?    

Rupar is a liberal, representative of every liberal, really. In regard to Marjorie Taylor Greene’s previous remarks, that Fauci was responsible for the pandemic and all, Rupar said her comments were an “insane rant,” and that they highlight where “Trumpers are these days with their covid conspiracy theories.”  

So, Rupar missed the New York Post piece, the NIH admission regarding Fauci’s funding of the gain of function research? He missed the emails demonstrating Fauci’s glee over taking down prominent epidemiologists at renowned academic institutions? You know, “Harvard … Standford … and Oxford.”  And he has missed Fauci’s many prescriptive blunders since the covid crisis began? 

So, what is it with this guy, Rupar? What’s his deal? 

It’s one of two things: he either doesn’t follow the news, doesn’t do any kind of research as a journalist should, which is his actual job. Or he’s just a liberal.  A religious zealot who follows the news, does research, learns the truth, but decides he is never-ever going say or report anything that imperils his liberal gods. Instead, he is going to say that Marjorie Taylor Greene is a ranting insane person, and that Rand Paul and Trumpers are covid conspiracy theorists, despite having confessions from an NIH director, documents, emails, and ultimate evidence to the contrary, and despite knowing what he is reporting is false. 

The liberal religion comes first.  Always.   

The behavior is insanely frustrating too truth-seekers, to conservatives. They see the Post article, the NIH confession.  They see the emails and documentation, and they’re apoplectic that a “journalist” balks at the evidence and ignores it.  What does one do with people like this? You shove incontrovertible evidence in front of their face and they behave as if it doesn’t exist. 

But, the NIH director said Fauci funde … 
But, there are these documents and emai … 
“Fox News sycophant!” 

So what does one do with people like this? Nothing. There is nothing to be done. Though their eyes can see and ears can hear. Though they can do the research and find the truth like everyone else, and even know the truth. They are ideologues, devout members of the liberal religion, and there is absolutely no way they will imperil they’re ideological brethren, and thus themselves.  

No way.   

“Believe, or get out!”  It’s the credo on the interior temple wall. 

So, is this guy Rupar really a journalist? And your average liberal—are they really anything more than cult members? It would be a different if the contradictory information on so many of their beliefs weren’t available. But, the evidence is available, and liberals one and all are exposed to it. I contend that liberals sometimes don’t want to be exposed to the opposing information.  

Why not?  

Because ignorance is a much easier way of life.  Marjorie Taylor Greene being a ranting lunatic, and Trumpers and Paul being conspiracy theorists, is a much easier way of life.  

This is why liberals attack people like Greene, a fearless and aggressive conservative, as quickly as they do. First, it’s because people like Greene are effective. Second, it’s because liberals can forever after call them kooks, and label them people not to be taken seriously or believed.  The attack comforts liberals, reassures them of their self-proclaimed superiority and purity. It doesn’t matter how much sense Greene or Paul make, what indisputable evidence they uncover and have in their possession. It’s always: “Marjorie Taylor Greene Rants Insanely,” and “Conspiracy Theorists Rand Paul and Trumpers.”  

That belief is reassuring. NIH confessions and email evidence? Not so much. 

Establishment liberals understand a key, if unfortunate, fact about a large swath of the American people. The commoners are more concerned with in the season premier date of their favorite television program, than they are with what establishment liberals are doing. All liberals have to say is, “Oh, don’t listen to those insane conservative kooks and conspiracy theorists. Get back to your entertainment and let us handle them.” 

Thank you, Your Grace. 

Hence, the liberal faithful refuse to believe you when you tell them, say, the National Institute of Health director confessed Dr. Fauci funded gain of function research, and that documents and emails prove it. The liberal faithful aren’t keen to believe kooks and conspiracy theorists. They have to discover the truth for themselves. And to whom do they turn for this verity? 

To their liberal news sources, of course, who spew religious liberal propaganda every day, all day.  

So, you have this war. A conflict between the claims of so-called kooks and conspiracy theorists, and the claims of these religious liberal propagandists masquerading as journalists and news agencies. In the middle are these disbelieving, noncommittal liberals who don’t want to do any of the intellectual work themselves. And why not? 

It diverts attention from their entertainment.  And whose claims do the disbelieving and noncommittal trust? 

“Get back to your show; let us handle them.” 

Thank you, Your Grace. 

It isn’t just that liberals want to educationally dumb-down a citizenry. They want to entertain them down, too. It’s a two-part strategy, really: dumb them down and keep them distracted. So their liberal superiors look really smart and capable.                

Works pretty well, too. 

The emotional response to liberal behavior is to call them stupid. But, they are not stupid. They are cult members, a necessary distinction. Like India Oxenberg—who was brainwashed into believing branding a man’s initials into her pelvic area and having sex-on-command with him is for the greater good of the cult—liberals are slaves.  Slaves who, likewise, pretend the absurdity of their behavior and beliefs are justified in the Light of the Liberal Seven, as it were. 

In Greek mythology, Pandora opened a container left in her care containing sickness, death and many other unspecified evils, which were then released into the world. One of the unspecified evils was surely liberalism. 

Simply, it pays to know who liberals are individually—religious zealots, and what they have become collectively—an evil cult.  Liars and frauds, blind loyalty and servitude. They are no friend to free nations or humanity, either one.      

©JMW 1/2021 
All Rights Reserved 

The Cult of Psychosis

In a recent court filing, Special Council, John Durham, exposed a scandalous problem in his investigation of Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian Collusion hoax, a scam she and her campaign invented, financed, and disseminated to smear her political opponent, Donald Trump. 

The problem is the attorneys representing the Clinton campaign are representing Igor Danchenko, too, the person Durham has just indicted. 

Reporter Gregg Jarrett, “Durham has found out, low and behold, that the law firm representing Danchenko is the same law firm that’s representing members of the Hillary Clinton campaign [who] are the focus, subject, and target of his ongoing investigation.  So obviously, there is a glaring, disqualifying conflict of interest.” 

Isn’t that interesting.  The as of now alleged conspirators found huddled together in a notoriously liberal democrat law firm.   

The point to the intro is this: Durham knows what Hillary Clinton did and is going after her campaign.  Via the court filing, this is what he is telegraphing to the world.  And knowing what Clinton did, Durham then knows Obama’s role, the role of the CIA, the FBI, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and the entire cast of Russia hoax conspirators.   

Now.  Be that as it surely is, it still isn’t the focus.  The focus is Clinton’s 2016 would’ve-been-given victory speech, recited recently in her streaming MasterClass endeavor.  It was quiet the spectacle, a verklempt Clinton conjuring her mother to deliver the triumphant news of her daughter becoming the first female President of the United States.   

Ah.  If only, mom … 

Here is the question: knowing full well she invented, financed, and disseminated the Russian collusion hoax, and committed treason against the United States, facts being now verified by Durham, how could Clinton give such an authentic MasterClass performance?   

Answer: psychosis.  For clarity, “a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality.”  

To render such a performance, Clinton is either a terrific actress, or she actually believes the things she says.  And let’s state the obvious—she’s no actress.  Hence, she believes her lies.  For example, when she says the attack against her intern diddling husband is a “vast right-wing conspiracy,” she believes it.  She makes herself believe it.  And when her husband’s DNA is found on the victim’s blue dress, Bill’s not a philanderer.  Monica Lewinsky is a gold-digging, trailer park bimbo—the same as the many other women with whom her husband was caught cheating.  Clinton makes herself believe this, too.   

And while Durham is there, in court, telling Clinton and the world she is a hoaxing criminal running a collusion scam on the American people, what is Clinton’s reaction?   She’s tearfully reading an acceptance speech to her conjured mother.  And let’s stipulate that Clinton doesn’t really believe what she says, and that she’s just calculating and ruthless. She still says the things she says, and behaves as though she believes them.   

Either way, it’s psychotic behavior. 

Hillary believes her lies, which is why she can be so genuinely verklempt and earnest—if psychotic and detached from reality.  That so many people and institutions further her lies, help her to distort reality, and protect her from it, introduces not only an enormous cast of human psychosis, but the devout behavior of a cult.  Having beliefs does not constitute a cult, incidentally.  It becomes a cult when the religion’s leaders are proven liars and frauds, and are yet believed and followed by the faithful anyway.  At which point it’s not just a cult, but an evil cult—of liars, frauds, and mindless minions.   

As for the disciples, these “people and institutions,” what is the institutional news media going to say, for example, if they acknowledge Durham’s indictments?  If they acknowledge what those indictments imply, and where he’s headed litigiously?  One and all must confess Clinton is corrupt, and of course, psychotic.  And if these charges are true of Clinton, then they are true of Barack Obama—as well as the CIA, the FBI, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and the entire cast of Russia hoax conspirators.   

Thus, the news media must then admit that, not only are America’s two leading liberal political figures treasonous and corrupt.  The nation’s leading law enforcement and intelligence agencies are, as well.  The current litigious circumstances may prevent such a final judgment, but there is certainly more than enough evidence, i.e. indictments from special counsel, to investigate the matter and report on it, which the news media by and large clearly has not done and is not doing. 

Equally corrupt, the news media would rather not ask the questions for knowing the answers; truth they do not ideologically and thus politically prefer, and reality they much want to avoid.  And when the desire is to avoid the truth and reality as a means of protecting ideological and political preferences, what are you collectively? 

A cult.  An evil cult. 

And liberal voters, what do they say to themselves regarding Durham’s indictments and the subsequent implications?  They must admit the people they support politically are not merely corrupt and psychotic, but evil.  They must confess it, because there is no other conclusion to be drawn.  This is precisely why liberal voters refuse to hear news from any other agency but the ones they prefer, agencies that cultishly keep the truth at bay.   

So.  We have a news media by and large that doesn’t want to report news for what it means to the liberal religion, and we have liberal voters who don’t want to hear the news from anywhere else but their ideological brethren.  It is much easier to say Fox News and the conservative media are just a bunch of Trump-loving right wingers, than it is to deal with the truth regarding the political people you support, the political party with which you align, your fellow ideologues in the news media, and with the truth regarding yourself.  Because if you address all that, then you are forced into certain acknowledgments.  And forced into the acknowledgements, into the confessions and realities that contradict what you want to believe, then you must change. 

You must extricate yourself from the cult and confess your intellectual sins. 

To protect the cult, the news media simply isn’t reporting.  Actually, they are delaying, hoping that somehow the political and legal machinery of their establishment cult will be able to make this threat to their religion disappear.  Thereby validating their beliefs and preventing the cult’s implosion.  Liberal voters, they are hoping the same.  

The contradictory truth—news of Durham’s investigation—is out there to be discovered and consumed, to which liberals one and all are no less exposed.  They are just loath to acknowledge and address the contradictions for the implications.  Liberals condescend, accusing everyone else of cognitive dissonance.  Yet they are the ones constantly rejecting new information that opposes their beliefs, and explaining the truth away. 

Accusing others of what you do yourself.  They call it: hypocrisy.  And the people who perform it: hypocrites. 

Or, liberals. 

If you don’t understand all this and how people could behave this way, then, congratulations!  You’re not psychotic.  You’re not a delusional cult member frightened by the truth.  Trust me, cult members don’t understand their behavior, either.  You can point all of this out to the faithful, can demonstrate the psychotic nature of executing a treasonous hoax and tearfully pretending you’re not involved and oblivious, but the faithful will yet be offended and outraged.  Why?   

They’re believing, devout, protective members of the cult.   

They have chosen their gods, and they prefer them psychotic. 

Liberals believe what they want to believe and that becomes the truth, becomes reality.  It becomes the doctrine by which they live, and a granite wall through which the genuine truth cannot pass.  The result?   

You become Hillary Clinton, who can tearfully read an acceptance speech as if she never committed a crime, and as if special counsel isn’t indicting her inner circle on his way to you, the ringleader.   

You become the entire female cast of The View, lauding Clinton for her courage and awesomeness, proclaiming future female presidents will stand on her psychotic shoulders.   

You become the news media, who review all of Durham’s evidence and court filings, which point directly at Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House, and ignore it all.   

You become your average liberal voter, who witnesses the lies and scams and failures of their establishment gods, yet cling to the hope those gods can make it all go away.    

Acknowledging the truth about their cult?  Changing their collective hearts and minds?   


Only evil people, those psychotic, can commit crimes and yet deliver indifferent would’ve-been acceptance speeches.  Only evil people proclaim the courageousness of a psychotic person and demand respect for them.  Only evil people ignore court filings and evidence coming into their newsrooms.  Only evil people ignore the moral failures of their political gods, and hope those gods can somehow make the frightening truth disappear.   

And in fact, only cult members would continue believing and supporting an ideology and religion that has failed, and psychotic leaders which have proven liars and frauds.  

The liberal faithful refuse to consider the corruption of their religion and gods, because they, too, don’t want to know the answer.  Actually, they know the answer, they just don’t want it confirmed.  And they don’t want confirmation because it means a reckoning—that the people and institutions they support are corrupt and evil, and their ideology, bankrupt.    

Hence, liberals would rather pretend like nothing is happening, as if there are no such threats as John Durham and his indictments.  That’s why seeing one of their gods verklempt and oblivious and psychotic makes them feel better, reassured. 

Warm and creamy-centered though the liberal faithful might feel, Durham is nonetheless real; his investigation exists, and is ongoing; and his indictments are legit.  And aware of Durham’s court filings, there is absolutely no reason a news industry would neglect a journalistic investigation of the matter, would neglect asking questions, and would neglect performing their journalistic duty on behalf the American people via watch dogging against tyranny.  Further, there is absolutely no reason voters would run frightened from the revelations. 

No.  Absolutely no reason at all, except to protect an evil cult.  Protection to include allowing a psychotic criminal to host a MasterClass on “Discovering Your [Criminal] Mission” and to pretend she’s not a crook.  

We think psychosis looks like something else, like a wild-haired crazy person chasing imaginary butterflies in a padded cell.  But, then there’s the cult version. 

©JMW 1/2022 
All Rights Reserved                       

Generational Prey


President Ronald Reagan warned, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”  What did he mean, exactly?  The query results from a recent report stating a majority of young people have climate anxiety—fear the earth’s climate is deteriorating and that human suffering and death are imminent. So what do youthful climate anxieties have to do with freedom being always a generation from extinction?  

Well, clearly young people believe the earth and themselves to be in peril.  And if the crisis is real, then someone must stop it.  And who are claiming themselves able?  Politicians.  Governments.  So, in whom is this young, anxious generation placing their trust and faith? 

The world’s “leaders”—rather, mere mortals like the rest of us. 

But, doesn’t God have a say in this supposed crisis?  You know, The Almighty.  The Creator of the Universe and of All Living Things.  Those are some pretty powerful titles and claims.  Are we just to replace him with mere political and scientific mortals?   

That’s precisely what the world’s evildoers expect.   

Except, the climate issue is a financial and Marxist fraud.  That’s correct: a financial and Marxist fraud.  The same as Russian collusion, Jussie Smollett’s MAGA hatted assault, and a demented, stammering, direction-challenged president getting an election record 81 million votes— 

C’mon, man!  The people love me, man!  Lots of ‘em, man! 

Apologies to the reader, Joe isn’t utilizing all cylinders. 

Indeed, climate change is yet another liberal hoax, a scam intended to procure the three most vehemently pursued elements by humans since the dawn of time: money, power, and control.  They are highly-prized goals of liberals because, well, the world is theirs. Only, there is just one problem. 

Having created everything, the world belongs to God.  And if the world is his, then it can’t belong to liberals.  If the world is God’s, then liberals have a superior to whom they are responsible, and from whom they take commands, like the rest of us.  Liberals despise the idea of a supreme God, because they fancy themselves gods.  And of course, given their ability to manage and manipulate the earth’s extremely complex climate, why would they think otherwise?  

Hence, the brazen usurpation of God’s authority isn’t usurpation at all to liberals.  Themselves gods, liberals are merely stepping up to claim their rightful earthly authority and power.  Power they demonstrate via this wondrous, if yet to be demonstrated, control over planet earth.   

It’s all delusional, yes—even if there is no God.  However, the more troubling aspect of this pursuit of human, earthly deity should be the strategy of these delusional posers.  To conquer people and become their god, there must be a strategy.  The key feature of the liberal plan?  

Grab your knickers …       

Targeting children.   

Naive, inexperienced, impressionable kids.  

Lying to them.  Frightening them.  Exploiting them.   

Considering liberals favor abortion, and that they can apathetically toss unborn fetuses into medical waste dumpsters like entrails at a slaughter house, the blatant disregard for actual breathing children should come as no surprise.  Nevertheless, the strategic revelation returns us to Reagan’s remarks, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.”  What Reagan meant was simply this:  

The world is, and will always be, occupied by evil human beings who will attack children to get what they want.  

Exhibits A & B: abortion, and the exploitative targeting of kids via lies, deceit, and fear.   

Of course, we generally and incorrectly say “the world” is the evil attacker of children.  When it is actually the individual human beings—in this case liberals, and in every case, actually—performing the attacks and evils.  It is a critical point that deserves amplification. 

The labels—liberals, the liberal establishment, the liberal news media, Hollywood, Big Tech, liberal voters, et al—are distractions from the fact individual human beings, clearly liberals, populate these organizations, institutions, and groups.  The labels are merely cover, a collective shield for the inhuman and evil deeds of individual human beings.  Using the labels, people then point their fingers and accuse wrongly.  It’s not “liberals,” or “the liberal establishment,” or “the liberal news media.”   

It’s people—individual human beings.  And not very good human beings, either, because they attack and exploit the most vulnerable: children.   

Sea turtles and Horned Owls?  No, no.  They’re sacred creatures.   

Actual human children?  Three words: Medical Waste Dumpster.   

And yes, discovering sea turtle or Horned Owl eggs in a dumpster, liberals would be apoplectic.  There would be investigations, news coverage in abundance, Save the Species fundraising, and a hot and howling demand to locate the perpetrators. 

Attacking children is not one of the worst things human beings can do.  It is the-worst-thing human beings can do.  Kids are innocent.  They don’t know anything.  They have no experience, no instinctual acuity.  Worse, they’re like little computers waiting to be programmed.  And how do liberals program them?  With lies and fear and anxiety—that is, if they can survive the medical waste dumpster.  

Is anything more heinous and unholy?  As in, evil? 

Good human beings say no. 

Evil will always attack children.  In a quest for wealth and power and control, that is precisely where an enterprise desirous of such things must begin, at the weakest point.  Survey the castle walls for attack, one searches for the most vulnerable point of entry, the easiest access.  In the quest for wealth, power, and control, liberals search for and select children—with goal-achieving glee, no less.   

Human beings aren’t human beings to liberals.  They’re a disposable commodity, a means to an end.  Just ask any successful despot. 

Innocent, naive, inexperienced, and immature—children are an easy mark, and liberals target them without feeling or remorse.  Liberals make children fearful and anxious with an issue like climate change, for example, so that an entire generation of them grows up not only believing the climate lie, but helping evil liberals secure their highly sought-after objectives.   

Via a liberal media, children are exposed to an array of liberals telling them to, one, be afraid of everything.  And two, to know that liberals have everything under control, are on the job, and are there to alleviate allll their tormenting fears and anxieties.  Liberals involve other children in the ruse, too, like Sweden’s 18-year-old environmental activist, Greta Van Thunberg.  They employ cartoon characters, blatantly lie about real animals and nature—all in a daily media assault on children of the world.  Abuse intended to frighten, and to encourage them toward submission.   

Submission and control achieved, subsequent generations grow up subordinate and oppressed.  Until another generation, perhaps two, three, maybe ten generations down the line, rises up and says, Enough!  We don’t have to live in fear, and under the thumb of other human beings.  We don’t have to be controlled by elitist liars, telling us what to do and how to do it, taking our money, dictating our futures, and encouraging fear and anxiety—over things (climate disaster) that never materialize.   

We don’t have to live that way, they decide.  Then the inevitable, ever-recurring, and bloody cycle of revolution begins, as it has so many times throughout human history … for this same reason every time.   

The idea is to make a generation of children subordinate and compliant, so that an entire free nation will eventually become subordinate and compliant, by willingly voting itself/themselves into subordination and compliance.  And given the ever-recurring incidents of revolution, it’s an idea/strategy that clearly works.   

Oppressed human beings eventually realize, however, that they’d rather be afraid and anxious and free, than to live under the fake umbrella of protection provided by egotistic and narcissistic fellow human beings.  Ordinary people who wake up every morning and take a big country dump like everybody else.  Ordinary people who fail spectacularly in their own lives, whose marriages and families fail, whose kids have addiction problems and worse, and who simply consider themselves superior to other human beings.   

Realize these things though the oppressed eventually do, it is realization after the fact, after the oppressive circumstances manifest and establish.  It’s precisely what Reagan both understood and meant.  Freedom’s extinction begins with children, society’s least prepared and most vulnerable, whom liberals no less target, and then attack with impunity.   

And it’s not just that liberals lie to children and make them fearful and anxious.  They encourage children to disobey authority. They tell children that it’s okay to falsely accuse others, and to never apologize; that human life is mere refuse worthy of a medical waste dumpster; that they are societal victims who haven’t the power or intellect to help themselves; that whatever debauchery manifests from living “their truth” is okay.  They even encourage children to question their sexuality, and toward homosexuality.  

Ultimately, liberals tell children that there is no God but liberals and liberalism—an earthly deity to whom children everywhere will now and forevermore genuflect.   

Liberals wouldn’t waste time convincing, say, Auschwitz-surviving Jews not to fear the big menacing buildings reeking of noxious gas and death.  Actual survivors are too experienced, too wise.  Jewish children a few generations removed, however, make much easier targets. 

See those buildings there?  Nevermind the stench.  They’re filled with toys and games and pudding.  Go ahead, have a look! 

In other words, to achieve their objectives and get what they want, liberals must target children.  The wanton abuse and exploitation of the most vulnerable is precisely how free nations fall, too.  People don’t believe this is how it happens, because it’s too heinous, too evil, too, unbelievable—that human beings would consider such a despicable strategy, much less employ it.   

But again, just ask any successful despot.  They’ll tell you. 

In the quest for wealth, power, and control, human beings are merely collateral damage—to include poor, defenseless, and innocent children. 

Societies are born for the struggle—good societies, like America.  They emerge for human oppression, are established via discipline and hard work.  Eventually, success and prosperity make people more affluent and life easier.  Generations later, children want for nothing and, worse, parents prefer it that way.   

As a consequence, society eventually ends-up with a generation self-absorbed, entitled, fearful, anxious, and ripe for the political picking.  A generation no less ready to submit to their earthly gods—the omnipotent climate controllers of planet earth, and other such magnificent feats.  

And it all results for the evil that is “liberalism”the label which conceals the fact that it’s human beings making generational prey of children.   

Having lived the communist work camp horrors of post World War II Russia, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote, “(T)he line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart.  This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years … If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them.” 

Well, there are people “insidiously committing evil deeds” modernly, and we know precisely who they are.  It prompts this unfortunate, yet vitally necessary Public Service Announcement:  

*Protect your children, and your nation, from liberals.* 

Or suffer the consequences.   

©2021 JMW 
All Rights Reserved 

Necessary Blackout

Holman Jenkins, The Wall Street Journal:

“A tech executive, members of the Clinton Campaign, people who we know were, Christopher Steele and Glenn Simpson, whose names weren’t mentioned [in Special Counsel John Durham’s indictment of Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee attorney Michael Sussmann]—there is a lot of material out there that the press could follow up on, and basically get to the bottom of this whole story about how the Russia collusion hoax was perpetrated.  Unfortunately, it looks like the press doesn’t want to follow up on it.” 

Imagine it: news of the Sussmann indictment comes across the wire in every bustling American newsroom.  Upon reading the release, some coffee-fetching newsroom intern in charge of incoming news alerts abruptly blurts, “Oh my gosh!  John Durham just indicted Hillary Clinton and Democrat National Committee attorney, Michael Sussmann!”—with a twenty-seven-page indictment, no less, that directly, not indirectly, implicates the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration.   

Immediately, there is convened in each newsroom a production meeting surrounding the newly emerged news.  And as evidenced by their complete dearth of reporting, a blackout of all news Russian collusion hoax and John Durham, it is unanimously decided to ignore this current revelation, and to continue ignoring the biggest news story in American history.   

In other words, some power that be, some managing editor or corporate executive controlling each of these newsrooms had to effectively, if not directly, say, “We’re not covering this story.  In fact, it’s going right here in the ol’ round file, to hopefully die.” 

And from editors, to managers, to reporters and on-air talent—all agree. 

We know this must be true of these production meetings. Because, well, the story is real.  Because John Durham is, indeed, Special Counsel investigating and now prosecuting the Russian collusion hoax.  Because Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele are real.  Because the indictments of FBI attorney Clinesmith and Clinton attorney Sussmann are real.  Because the firing of four leading FBI figures in the Obama administration is real, too. 

So, the story is real, alright.  Real to everyone but the news media.  And in terms of the universal agreement in each newsroom, have we seen any defections?  Any whistleblowers coming forth to confess: “Our news agency has forbidden coverage of the collusion hoax?” 

No.  Hence, the universal agreement.  Rather, the complicity in journalistic malpractice. 

The magnitude of the Durham story cannot be overstated, which makes this intentional, conspiratorial dereliction of news media duty all the more egregious.  Even so, let’s be clear, and accurate: the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration, along with the administration’s CIA and FBI, colluded to subvert an election, and thereby committed treason against the United States.   

So again, the story is far beyond monumental.  Yet, from its emergence in 2017 to the present, virtually the entire national news media, save Fox News, has made no effort at all to, as Jenkins pointed out, “get to the bottom” of the matter.  And worse, obviously.  They have individually forbidden any and all investigation, and any and all reporting.   

Now, why-would-that-happen? 

It happens for one reason and one reason only: ideological soul mates, the news media has to protect both the Democrat party and the establishment they have built, manage, and control together. Liberalism, or more practically, evil, is the religion for the United States.  And in all it’s immoral and ungodly beliefs and doctrine, establishment liberals are here to make sure the religion is strictly practiced—forbidding historic, cataclysmic news events when necessary. 

And if the Sussmann indictment weren’t enough, Durham also subpoenaed tech executive, Rodney Joffee.  An individual linked to Sussmann who brought information to the FBI about an alleged server the Trump campaign used to supposedly communicate with the Kremlin through a Russian bank, Alfa Bank—information that proved false.   

And the news media response to that adjoining news?   

That story went into the newsroom round-file, too. 

The fact is, Robert Mueller admitted to finding no evidence whatsoever of collusion between Trump and Vladimir Putin.  A truth which should have inspired a single question in each and every honest newsroom: if no evidence of collusion was unearthed, after a 2 ½ year investigation by four separate federal agencies, no less, to include Mueller’s.  Then where did all the information for the nonexistent crime come from?   

Or more directly, who’s responsible for the obvious hoax?  And why was it executed?  

Had the news media asked these questions, it would have led them straight to Hillary Clinton, Glenn Simpson, Christopher Steele, Perkins-Coie, Michael Sussmann, Rodney Joffee, the Obama administration, its CIA and FBI, and into the once ongoing and now completed investigations of Fox News and people like Gregg Jarrett, Devin Nunes, and an entire cast of reporters and public officials who actually did do the job of “getting to the bottom of the story”— 

again, the biggest political corruption story in United States history.  

So now, having ignored the story for five years, and it currently coming to light via Durham, what is the news media to do?   

What they hoped would happen is that establishment pols would somehow make the story go away, with news media round file assistance, of course.  Yet, despite their very best, five-year-long efforts, the pols failed.  Helpless, the news media now watches Durham, however incrementally, bring his case to the American people.  And what is the news media to do when his indictments run deeper?  When the truth tells the story they, now clear and undeniable conspirators, refused to investigate and tell?  

Let’s put it this way: Russian collusion was not only proven untrue by four separate federal investigations, but a political hoax.  A calculated, purposeful political fraud.  And how did the news media respond? 

They ignored it.  Moved on.  Continued their collective, ceaseless, baseless, deceitful, and thus evil assault on Donald Trump and American democracy. 

So, however incontrovertibly true and historical and alarming, don’t think Durham’s future revelations are going to inspire fresh news media behavior.  The news media ignored the treason story when it began emerging in 2017, and to the present.  So why would they start covering it now?  

They won’t.  Conspiratorial, committed, and exposed—they can’t. 

In fact, they will assist Clinton and Obama and the establishment in spinning their way out.  Why?  Because otherwise they would be indicting and destroying themselves.  

Lying—it’s the only remaining path forward. 

The collusion business a proven establishment hoax, one can guarantee the establishment’s in-house, conspiratorial news media isn’t going to be as eager to jump on the condemnation from Durham, as they were the Trump lies of their fellow conspirators.  One can guarantee they won’t be as eager to believe what Durham says about Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration, as they were everything—Russian collusion, a “perfect” Ukrainian phone call, two unfounded impeachments—involving Donald Trump.   All of which was mere cover-fire for Hillary Clinton and Obama administration treason, cover-fire the news media was eager to lay down for their fellow traitors.   

No.  There is no guarantee but one: that’s the news media trying to convince the public of investigative fraud, that Durham’s revelations and indictments are unjust, and that the crooks aren’t really crooks, but rather selfless warriors for democracy.  

Again, lying—it’s the only remaining path forward. 

The prosperous aspect of the Trump presidency was that he flushed liberals one and all from hiding.  Most liberals like to practice their liberal religion in anonymity.  Because their ideology and its doctrine are evil, and because moral people don’t like and won’t accept it.  So, liberals keep their beliefs private and practice them secretly, preferring not to be known publicly as “liberal,” which, until Trump they have been able to do.   

Trump forced them into the open, forced them to defend their religion and beliefs.  Saying basically, You’re either for America or against her, he made liberals choose sides.  The public ultimatum forced liberals into panic and hysterics, and into saying and doing things which were totally irrational, ridiculous, hateful, and un-American.   

In other words, and in terms of national prosperity, Trump forced liberals one and all to reveal exactly who they are, which in a single phrase is: miserable, evil frauds. 

Liberals aren’t the virtuous people they present themselves to be.  They’re liars.  They’re hypocrites.  They’re miserable malcontents, imperious and condescending.  Most importantly, they’re fools.  

Complete and utter fools, averse to morality, truth, and America.  

Until Trump, no one had made liberals, including the republican version, to so abruptly choose.  He rattled the establishment cage, forced them all from hiding and to declare.  Finally, liberals had to defend themselves, had to defend their establishment temple and religion, a cause for which every faithful liberal believer felt compelled to rush to the front lines.  To include those in the news media, of course, who collectively threw historic and cataclysmic news stories about their fellow ideologues in the round file. 

If what Durham has uncovered and is litigating is true.  If Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign attempting to subvert an election, and thereby committed treason.  Then the last five years has absolutely nothing to do with Donald Trump.  He’s just a face, a decoy, a distraction.  He’s a patsy to draw ire and to despise, while establishment liberals perform and cover up their evil deeds. 

Meanwhile, Joe Biden confessed publicly to bribing a Ukrainian prosecutor with a billion dollars.  The news media not only completely ignored the confession.  They then invented the crime for Donald Trump, which was used in an attempted impeachment.     

Joe Biden‘s son Hunter has a laptop that not only reveals Biden family financial corruption with China, but a potential national security issue for the United States.  The news media completely ignored this genuine, verifiable story, too.    

Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration, its CIA and FBI, not only rigged and allowed to be rigged a Democrat Party primary election, twice.  They lied to the FISA court, illegally spied on an opponent’s political campaign, attempted to subvert the 2020 presidential election, and committed treason against United States.   

And the news media has completely ignored these stories, also—for 5 ½ years now.   

Along with American citizens, Biden left behind $85 billion worth of armory and elite technology in Afghanistan.  Meanwhile, he and his establishment allies are also trying to pass a $3.5 trillion dollar spending package.  All this waste and these exorbitant expenditures, and yet Donald Trump needed merely $5 billion for wall construction.  Monies Biden and his establishment allies claimed were impossible to secure.  And the news media’s response to the waste, deceit, and hypocrisy? 

No interest.  No reporting.  No penalties. 

Hence, there is but one conclusion: it’s way past time to begin looking at the news media as not merely corrupt, but as an enemy of democracy, of the United States, and of the American people. 

As for the foolish loyalists who haven’t yet reached this obvious conclusion, one can bet they won’t possess and display the same enthusiasm for the collusion story Durham is telling, as they possessed and displayed for the story these news media traitors told them about Trump.  One can bet they won’t possess sympathy for the victims of these news media traitors, either.  Victims to include not merely Trump and his familial, relational, and administrative sphere. But America, and thus these foolish loyalists themselves.                      

Unable to recognize their own victimization, should we really expect fools of such lofty degree to realize their folly? 

Be hopeful, but keep your scrilla in your pocket. 

©JMW 2021 
All Rights Reserved 

Humiliation Unbearable

“Your dad says you’ve got a world class bullshit detector.  Who lied this morning?”   
“On the stand you mean?” 
“They don’t teach this in law school.  Yes.   All witnesses lie.” 
“About what?” 
“Keeping their jobs.  But in [this] case, money—most people skim.  Morality.  We all want to be good little girls and boys.  Sex?  Just assume everyone screwing everyone else, unless proven otherwise.  And, the big one: avoiding humiliation.  You’d think folks would be scared of prison or lethal injection.  Nope.  It’s loss of face.” 

Interviewing a young potential assistant in the film The Whole Truth, a lawyerly Keanu Reeves presented one of the realities of human behavior.  People lie for many reasons, it’s true, but the most compelling reason it to prevent humiliation.  Humiliation is a powerful deterrent.  Or in this case, a powerful provocateur.  To humans cursedly self-aware, nothing is worse.  People would rather endure anything than the public exposure of their lamentable failures, and the unbearable embarrassment that coincides.  The fear of disgrace is universally human, certainly.  However, it is a particularly powerful motivator for those without morals, virtue, character, courage and, most importantly, humility.   

It is to say, humiliation is particularly powerful motivator for liberals.    

For example, $44 million taxpayer dollars spent on a Russian collusion hoax that produced absolutely zero evidence of the crime (because, uh, it was a hoax)—a hoax now fully exposed with Special Counsel John Durham’s indictment of Clinton attorney, Michael Sussmann.   

So, where are liberals admitting the investigative failure and fraud?  That the establishment ran a scam on the American people?   

How about the obvious, that Joe Biden has dementia?  That he took a roaring economy and turned it into a dumpster fire in just 8 months?  That his son Hunter’s laptop not only exists, but also exposes Biden family corruption and compromises US national security?  

Where are liberals admitting these established facts? 

Liberals one and all watch Joe Biden’s bumbling, forgetful antics every day. They know he’s struggling.  They know he is not a person ready to make decisions and to lead the greatest nation on earth.  The fact that he is suffering and incapable, in fact, opens a Pandora’s Box of implications.  For instance, why is he being allowed to continue?  Who’s managing him, guiding him?  How did he ascend to the presidency in the first place? And why isn’t the news media reporting on his obvious cognitive illness and the national security implications for it?   

Open that box, and the stench of humiliation becomes quickly overbearing. 

Of course, there is undeniable and actual collusion occurring between the Democrat party and national news media.   

There is covid czar Anthony Fauci, who has been caught lying to congress about his agency’s financial role in gain of function research at the Wuhan lab, and thus his role in the viral catastrophe.   

All true.  All established fact.  So, where are the liberal admissions? 

Liberals aren’t confessing any of these truths, and so many more.  Because, well, they can’t.  And why not?   

For the “big one,” as Reeves put it: humiliation.   

Having been grotesquely wrong about literally everything for the last five years, admitting any one of these facts invites yet more dreaded disgrace.  And in case you didn’t know, liberals all are infallible—at least, they think themselves so.  And any evidence to the contrary is simply humiliation they refuse to bear. 

It’s childish behavior, really.  Immature.  Adolescent.  Weak and pathetic.  

Now.  One could argue that liberals are unaware of these facts.  Because, it is also yet another fact that the national news media simply doesn’t report the news, specifically news that indicts their fellow conspirators.  And if you’re a liberal cult member depending on a conspiratorial news media for information, which only serves its political allies.  Then it is possible you aren’t aware of these facts.  

Of course, it’s difficult to believe liberals aren’t aware, given the near hysterical emotional investment they had in seeing Donald Trump destroyed, and for all things anti-Trump to be true.  Hence, they must have followed the news expectantly, hoping for favorable outcomes, of which they saw none—zero.  So the emotional investment and expectancy says liberals were tuned-in and know precisely what is going on.  And the many disappointments they experienced should’ve told them that the people from whom they were getting their information were not merely wrong, but ideological frauds. 

So, it’s pretty certain liberals one-and-all know the facts, and that the facts are humiliating.  Hence, liberals would rather not admit the facts—any of them.  In fact, they would rather and would readily endure anything else.   

Say like, prison.  Or, lethal injection, for examples.  

Think about it.  The Sussmann indictment is proof of what we already know, that the entire Russian collusion case was a complete, establishment-driven, treasonous political scam on the American people.  It means the news media who peddled the hoax for nearly three years was completely, and also knowingly, wrong.  And where does that leave all the liberal faithful who went enthusiastically and blindly along for the ride? 

Let’s just say it’s not, positively promotional.   

It takes a long time to get to the truth of matters because, well, that’s the liberal stratagem.  They bury the system and the public in lies so that it takes years to dig out.  And when the system and public finally dig out, and the truth is exposed about liberals and their lies, they never confess.  And why not? 

Where it concerns liberal elites, it’s for pure, disgrace-immune narcissism.  For the rest, the faithful, well, the humiliation is simply too awful. 

In regard to the Russian collusion fraud, now being fully and finally exposed, senior editor at The Federalist, Mollie Hemingway, said that every liberal should “hang their heads in shame.”  Yes, well. True. But that would require humility, which liberals despise as much as latter-stage humiliation.  And the fact is, if they practiced the former, they wouldn’t endure the latter. 

Liberals practice nor endure neither. 

The way to view liberals and their ideology is to liken it to steel sphere, one coated in tough titanium for greater durability, and then Tefloned for its non-stick properties.  Liberals live within this sphere with their liberal beliefs.  Nothing can be allowed to penetrate the protected space, specifically facts and truth.  Thus, the resilient, impenetrable sphere design, which is dutifully maintained internally, incidentally, so as to prevent any fissures, any points of entry.  Because, if a single fact or element of truth is allowed to penetrate, is allowed to seep in, then their entire belief system is compromised.   

That’s why when you offer liberals irrefutable logic and physical evidence, they reject it out of hand.  They have to reject it.  Facts nor truth can neither one be allowed to penetrate the hardened, well-maintained sphere because, if it does, then not only are their beliefs wrong.  Worse, those beliefs must change, beliefs they desperately want to maintain, no less.  And why the desperation? 

Well, the particular belief is what they want to believe, first.  And second:  


They’ve been existing on flawed beliefs, now demonstrated as such via the unchallengeable logic and physical evidence.  And suddenly, they’re intellectual dopes.  Suddenly, they’re dupes who’ve willingly, enthusiastically allowed themselves to be duped.  They’re fools, brought face-to-face with their foolishness, for all to witness.  They’re buffoons who have been crowing about the unopposable certitude of their now verifiably failed beliefs, after mocking and denigrating the accurate and wiser doctrine of their ideological foes.   

And the reaction to this humiliating nightmare? 

To save face, of course.      

So, liberals change topics and argue something else; or they name call and accuse.  They do everything, anything!, but acknowledge their protective sphere has been breached and that their beliefs are corrupt and failed.  People ask, “Why wouldn’t liberals want the truth of matters?”  Well, like everyone else, they do want the truth in most matters—is my spouse cheating on me?  Are my children okay?  Is this lump under my arm something to worry about?  Did I leave the stove on, candle’s burning?   

However, when liberals want to believe something, for jealousy or resentment or hatred or whatever the reason, there is no fact so truthful or compelling to have them intellectualize their position and amend their beliefs.  They would rather maintain the jealousy, resentfulness, hatred, and beliefs, which signals they are already these ugly things, things natural, comforting, and in a sadistic way, soothing to them. 

It takes humility to do otherwise, to be honest and pliable, and to change.  A prospect liberals despise as much as humiliation.  But again, if they would practice humility, they wouldn’t endure latter stage humiliation.  But then, try telling jealous, resentful, hate-filled liberals that.  The result will be as pleasant and productive as using logic and evidence to prove their flawed beliefs to them—  

Racist!  Right-winger! White privilege!    

Given the choice between humiliation and nasty labels, the labels are way easier.  Much more natural, comforting, and in a sadistic way, soothing to them, too.                              

People can believe whatever they want.  However, beliefs come with consequences, one of them being humiliation and the need to save face.  Of course, there is death and eternity, too, pretty significant consequences in themselves for chosen beliefs.   

Unfortunately, all are about as compelling to liberals as lethal injection, and prison.    

If everyone simply adhered to the truth, was a prisoner of it, there wouldn’t be all the fighting and dysfunction.  And gee, who should we blame for that?  

©JMW 2021 
All Rights Reserved