Speaking of his daily job of debate with liberal pundits on television, CNN’s Scott Jennings, invariably a lone conservative in a pack of constantly feinting liberal hyenas, said that, after a previous segment is over and a particular issue has been discussed, you simply must forget the feelings and drama of the past debate and move on to the next issue.
It is basic emotional discipline, having the maturity to control your feelings and forge ahead.
Always under collective mob attack everywhere they appear in the media, conservative pundits have had to develop this discipline and have matured in the control. Liberal pundits, on the other hand, not so much. Setting the premise for debate and controlling the dialogue every day and in nearly every media venue, liberals have never had to bother with such, to them, trivialities. Liberals running the game, it is house rules. Liberals get upset when their opponents don’t play by the rules, and minus the discipline and maturation, they tend to stay that way, too. This always occurs when, during debate, Jennings and conservative pundits like him publicly hand liberals their intellectual asses on television. Liberals don’t know how to deal with it and lose their, um, guano. Liberals can never win a debate because they subsist on lies and deceit, which is no less illustrated by these conservative pundits on all these news and opinion programs every day and night. It is easy to “destroy” liberals. All one needs to do is lay out the facts and tell the truth.
Imagine it: simple truth being an indomitable debate strategy.
Of course, to succeed in debate, liberals cannot allow this truth visibility or to stand, either one. Hence, they must talk about everything but the facts and truth, which they do by introducing another topic and redirecting the conversation to something else, something favorable. It’s the simple aphorism: “If you don’t like what is being said,” or in this case, if you don’t like the truth, “then change the conversation.” This is precisely what liberals do in every debate because the truth ends all debate and, worse, defeats them.
Again, imagine it: truth to liberals is kryptonite, garlic, the cross of Christ.
For instance, when you say you support a Nazi sympathizing, female abusing senate candidate. Then, when that candidate ends his campaign for being a Nazi sympathizer and for rape accusations, and you are suddenly and contrarily critical of that candidate for being a Nazi sympathizing female abuser.
Well, the truth in this matter is you are a hypocrite—you sanction; then you disapprove.
That hypocrisy then called out by a conservative pundit during televised debate, the charge is not only apparent, but lethal. So, rather than allow that truth its lethality, liberals simply change the subject. The trick is, liberals aren’t the ones defending themselves. Their opponents are.
You are.
To arrange this scenario, liberals will quite literally say anything. They will falsely accuse, make the most ridiculous assertions, and even lie, unashamedly and unremorsefully. Anything to (a) conceal the lethal truth, to change the subject (b), and (c) to have you on defense instead of them. This is much more preferable than them stammering and stuttering in search of a cogent thought, and it plays a lot better on tv, too.
But then you are asking: what about the truth in all this?
Precisely.
If we accept that, the truth, then the conversation and debate are over, and liberals are the hypocritical frauds they are and have conclusively been shown to be. Of course, that shall not be. Because liberals are better than you. Proven, of course, by how they outwit conservatives with this redirection tactic and their lies. And yes, liberals are proud of that. You can keep trying to redirect the conversation back to the truth, but for its lethality, liberals simply won’t allow it—can’t allow it!
You are on defense, not them.
Of course, liberals can’t be humiliated, either, which is another data point and obstacle. Take the Graham Platner situation, for example: “Hey you guys loved Platner. Now, suddenly, he is a despicable reprobate.” Utterly shameless—incapable of the emotion, in fact—liberals don’t care about hypocritical appearances. When this very remark was directed at them, liberals didn’t feel humiliation at all, which can be positively deduced by their visible seething. Liberals are not only impervious to feelings of humiliation, but contrition, too. Liberals don’t sit there feeling awful about the damage they cause to others or the human suffering they have inspired. Feelings of remorse are nowhere on their emotional radar. For proof, just observe the expressions of Senate Judiciary Committee liberals while Sen. Lindsey Graham was scalding their asses over what they were doing to supreme court justice nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. All were smug and indifferent. The disgusting event occurred nearly 8 years ago, too, and each of these very liberals is still behaving the same way. No guilt. No shame. No remorse. No behavioral change.
Clearly, liberals are impudent, evil human beings determined to remain that way.
One emotion liberals aren’t impervious to, however, is anger—a ready feeling of the weak and immature. Hypocrisy or otherwise, liberals don’t care about the charge. They care that someone makes it and forces them into defense. They don’t care about the exposure, necessarily. They care about the discreditation. Defeated enough in the arena of ideas and debate, credibility, the coin of the political realm, suffers. Credibility diminished for too many poor and failed political opinions and positions, and nobody listens to what you say anymore. You are an ineffective intellectual pariah—and to self-important liberals, nothing could be worse.
This is precisely why liberals do what they do: redirect and bury the truth. So then, actually, Jennings nor any other conservative pundit are the liberal’s enemy. Truth is their enemy, along with the facts that define it. And after lying about Donald Trump for 10 years and counting, from Russian collusion to faking assassination, for example, this is how liberals keep on going. Who survives so many humiliating debate defeats, day after day? Your opinions and positions proven to be pure, intellectual bunk for 10 years? Readers would not survive such a record at their jobs, for 10 minutes, much less 10 years.
Well, liberals survive. The whole liberal complex has kept going because everybody sits around on all these news shows of the liberal media discussing what liberals want to discuss. Purely because liberals don’t want to talk about all their humiliating analytical and debate failures: the intellectual shortcomings, all the accusations that fell flat; the thousands of positions they took that the evidence ultimately didn’t support; about how their credibility is shot to hell and nonexistent.
Liberals don’t want to talk about any of that because it is a direct condemnation. Because it allows someone like, say, Jennings to retort to every liberal pundit at the CNN roundtable:
“Excuse me but, who the f— are you, liberal, and why are you still talking?”
A legit remark because every position these liberals have taken, every accusation and argument they have made, has failed—in Trump’s case, for 10 years running. In the arena of ideas and debate, liberals aren’t merely failures. They are failures with zero credibility. Whatever they say should be perceived as intellectual foolishness and argumentative rubbish. Of course, saying “Who the f— are you …” to these people isn’t going to inspire contrition in their hearts, no more than it will motivate them to recognize or acknowledge the injurious things that they have been doing to people or the suffering they have caused. No, liberals are going to be filled with rage, instead. Seething rage. They knew the truth of the issues, and that their positions and arguments were not just wrong but patently false and fraudulent. They just didn’t like the truth. So they redirected the debate to something else. Wherein they then lied, knowingly. Wherein they falsely accused. Wherein they called people racist and bigoted, Nazi’s—and all at the expense and suffering of other human beings. And let me tell you how liberals felt about it …
It didn’t bother them one bit.
They did it all gleefully, in fact.
Rejecting the truth and changing the conversation is how liberals and their media have survived the last 10 years. What happens to conservative pundits like Jennings in these circumstances is he ends up debating the next liberal fraud, never discussing the failures and utter lack of credibility of the liberals he is opposing. In other words, Jennings and everybody else ends up talking about the next candidate, the next election, the next manufactured Trump scam because we don’t ever go back and review the dismal liberal debate record and their dearth of credibility on the issues.
Liberals don’t go back and review their record, and they make sure you don’t go back and review it, either.
The only reason liberals haven’t disappeared from the public square altogether is because, via corporate media, they own the public microphone. They are the media. They say who speaks; they control what is said. We talk about these anchors and journalists, those who present the news and inform the public. However, they aren’t the problem. If corporate wanted honesty and credibility restored in their respective media enterprises, the intellectual failures would be punished, and truthfulness would be revived and reinstituted. If corporate determined it, the daily liberal con would end tomorrow. The reason it persists is because corporate, just a bunch of liberals, too, wants it to continue.
I have a terrific doctor, Dr. Brian. I don’t ever have to get a second opinion from another physician. When Dr. Brian tells me something, we move forward. The reason for the confidence is that, for 30 years, he has been right about everything, and not just concerning my health, but the health of many of my family members. Every prescription, every piece of medical advice, we get better, feel better, and thrive. It is to say, Dr. Brian has tremendous credibility—trustworthy, abiding, and enduring credibility. I trust what he says because, well, he’s always right and earns it.
The point is that it is just the opposite with liberals and their media. The only reason people still think they have credibility is because they get to sit on television every night pretending that they have it.
So, before you believe a story, it needs to matter who is telling the story.
©JMW 7/26
All Rights Reserved
John Mark Warren 